Re: fstests: Don't use gawk's strtonum breaking existing fstests

[Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>]

On 12.12.19 г. 7:16 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019/12/12 上午12:33, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11.12.19 г. 17:53 ч., Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Following upstream commit:
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git/commit/?id=37520a314bd472ed720ed0611c6b69e418be9b61
>>>
>>> breaks btrfs/095 and btrfs/098 tests.
>>>
>>
>> The problem is that the old code was using gawk's strtonum and returning
>> a base 10 number from an octal input. Whereas the existing code gets an
>> octal number which is again parsed as an octal when using printf. So the
>> path in question needs to either by reverted or extended so that the
>> necessary conversion from octal to base 10 is performed _before_ calling
>> printf.
>>
> 
> Well, octal values really makes no sense. We should go either hex, or
> human readable decimal.
> 
> Octal should only be left for certain historical use cases, like user
> privileges. For content dump, octal is never a good use case to show offset.
> 
> Since current filter_od can't handle -Ax yet, what about just use hash
> instead of the problem prone od?
> And put the od output into seqres.full for later debug?

I disagree, using the output of od one can see the actual content of
extents and can quickly diagnose the failure.


> 
> Thanks,
> Qu
>