* BTRFS and "ionice"
@ 2013-03-11 10:26 Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-03-11 12:52 ` Dan van der Ster
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Swâmi Petaramesh @ 2013-03-11 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Hi,
I use "ionice -c 3 <command>" to run some low-priority background tasks
(i.e. tar, big file copies, or performing checksums sur very big files)
using the disk "only when idle", which would be supposed to have very
little impact on my system performance meanwhile.
I can be pretty sure that those tasks are I/O-bound and use very little
CPU (and they are niced as well, anyway).
However, when such tasks are running my BTRFS system slows down to a
crawl, becomes very very unresponsive, and it seems to me that disk I/O
is completely saturated (LED is fixed lit...)
So I wonder if BTRFS correctly support ionice, or if it's plain useless ?
TIA
Kind regards.
--
Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E
Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: BTRFS and "ionice"
2013-03-11 10:26 BTRFS and "ionice" Swâmi Petaramesh
@ 2013-03-11 12:52 ` Dan van der Ster
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan van der Ster @ 2013-03-11 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Swâmi Petaramesh; +Cc: linux-btrfs
Hi,
Which IO scheduler do you use? I used to have terrible read
performance during a btrfs scrub until I switched the disk scheduler
from deadline to cfq.
Cheers, Dan
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use "ionice -c 3 <command>" to run some low-priority background tasks
> (i.e. tar, big file copies, or performing checksums sur very big files)
> using the disk "only when idle", which would be supposed to have very
> little impact on my system performance meanwhile.
>
> I can be pretty sure that those tasks are I/O-bound and use very little
> CPU (and they are niced as well, anyway).
>
> However, when such tasks are running my BTRFS system slows down to a
> crawl, becomes very very unresponsive, and it seems to me that disk I/O
> is completely saturated (LED is fixed lit...)
>
> So I wonder if BTRFS correctly support ionice, or if it's plain useless ?
>
> TIA
>
> Kind regards.
>
> --
> Swāmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E
> Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-11 12:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-11 10:26 BTRFS and "ionice" Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-03-11 12:52 ` Dan van der Ster
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox