From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson@jamponi.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs-show vs. btrfs different output
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:11:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514B232E.2050705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKuK5J05iXaDd7Q4fLby9vJyPXBURx06xb0_--WmgTpJ0j2RoA@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/21/13 10:04 AM, Jon Nelson wrote:
> I'm running openSUSE 12.3 x86_64 which has an unknown git version, but
> reports v0.19.
> I'm also supplying the output from git which reports itself as:
> v0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b
>
> The problem is that btrfs-show (git) and btrfs fi show (git) give
> /different/ output from each other which is also different from the
> (older) btrfs.
>
> First btrfs-show (git):
>
> **
> ** WARNING: this program is considered deprecated
> ** Please consider to switch to the btrfs utility
> **
> Label: none uuid: b5dc52bd-21bf-4173-8049-d54d88c82240
> Total devices 2 FS bytes used 230.34GB
> devid 1 size 298.09GB used 298.09GB path /dev/sda
> *** Some devices missing
>
> Label: none uuid: 7feedf1e-9711-4900-af9c-92738ea8aace
> Total devices 4 FS bytes used 348.21GB
> devid 4 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sdb3
> devid 3 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sda3
> devid 6 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdc
> devid 5 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdd
>
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b
>
>
> Now btrfs fi show (git):
>
> failed to open /dev/sr0: No medium found
> Label: none uuid: 7feedf1e-9711-4900-af9c-92738ea8aace
> Total devices 4 FS bytes used 348.21GB
> devid 5 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdd
> devid 6 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdc
> devid 4 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sdb3
> devid 3 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sda3
>
> Label: none uuid: b5dc52bd-21bf-4173-8049-d54d88c82240
> Total devices 2 FS bytes used 230.34GB
> devid 1 size 298.09GB used 298.09GB path /dev/sdb
> *** Some devices missing
>
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-253-g7854c8b
>
>
> And now the (older) btrfs fi show:
>
> failed to read /dev/sr0
> Label: none uuid: 7feedf1e-9711-4900-af9c-92738ea8aace
> Total devices 4 FS bytes used 348.21GB
> devid 5 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdd
> devid 6 size 298.09GB used 282.53GB path /dev/sdc
> devid 4 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sdb3
> devid 3 size 460.76GB used 444.23GB path /dev/sda3
>
> Btrfs v0.19+
>
> which has similar output to the (older) btrfs-show.
>
>
> The differences are:
>
> 1. the order of devices varies (not a big deal)
Heh, that is annoying though.
> 2. the current git btrfs-show and btrfs fi show both output
> *different* devices for device with UUID
> b5dc52bd-21bf-4173-8049-d54d88c82240, and they're both wrong.
does blkid output find that uuid anywhere?
Since you're working in git, can you maybe do a little bisecting
to find out when it changed? Should be a fairly quick test?
-Eric
> Somewhat confusingly, /dev/disk/by-uuid/ only shows three devices:
>
> bd40cb4e-93bb-4600-8455-ca1185aa8abe -> ../../md3
> 7feedf1e-9711-4900-af9c-92738ea8aace -> ../../sda3
> 4f0b27a5-5f5b-413c-a71b-b5a3bec5482c -> ../../md2
>
> What's going on with the varied output from (git) btrfs-show vs.
> 'btrfs fi show' (vs. the older, as-shipped btrfs)?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 15:04 btrfs-show vs. btrfs different output Jon Nelson
2013-03-21 15:11 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-03-21 15:29 ` Jon Nelson
2013-03-21 15:33 ` Helmut Hullen
2013-03-21 16:25 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-22 3:06 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-22 13:59 ` Jon Nelson
2013-03-22 22:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-21 15:35 ` Helmut Hullen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514B232E.2050705@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jnelson@jamponi.net \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox