Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Jon Nelson <jnelson@jamponi.net>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs-show vs. btrfs different output
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:06:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514BCAB1.6040608@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514B346D.1010403@redhat.com>


> What we really need is the right bits in the right places
> to let the administrator know if a device looks like it might
> be corrupt & in need of fixing, vs. ignoring it altogether.


--
 > 2. the current git btrfs-show and btrfs fi show both output
 > *different* devices for device with UUID
 > b5dc52bd-21bf-4173-8049-d54d88c82240, and they're both wrong.
--

  here per Jon experience showing stale btrfs on /dev/sdb (note
  that good btrfs is on /dev/sdb3) is wrong.

  More over when we show something like /dev/sdb and /dev/sdb3
  both have two different btrfs, its a bit scary.

  I would vote for ignoring it altogether since we have
  btrfs-find-root and btrfs-select-super to help find the
  backup SB for recovery if needed.

Thanks.

-Anand

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-22  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-21 15:04 btrfs-show vs. btrfs different output Jon Nelson
2013-03-21 15:11 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-21 15:29   ` Jon Nelson
2013-03-21 15:33     ` Helmut Hullen
2013-03-21 16:25     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-22  3:06       ` Anand Jain [this message]
2013-03-22 13:59       ` Jon Nelson
2013-03-22 22:34         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-21 15:35 ` Helmut Hullen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514BCAB1.6040608@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=jnelson@jamponi.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox