From: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: adam900710@gmail.com, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Qgroup rework with other Fujitsu fix.
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:03:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557681C6.7050608@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557506BC.701@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hi Qu,
> Hi Chris,
>
> Please pull the 19 patchset from my branch for_chris_4.2.
> We have tested it in a week.
>
> Although it is originally based on 4.1-rc5, not the integration branch.
> Quick tests shows no new bugs, although we will rerun the full test,
> I'll send the patchset first for your reviewing:
>
> https://github.com/adam900710/linux.git for_chris_4.2
>
> This contains the following patches.
>
> 1. Qgroup rework (first 18 commits)
> These commits rework the qgroup framework.
> Now, quota won't need to do per-delayed-ref accounting.
> But only need to record dirty delayed-ref, and account quota at transaction time.
Can you share perfomaces results with/without patches with quota enabled.
Especially, if there are thounds of snapshots, how much performaces down or up
with these patches applied.
Regards,
Wang Shilong
>
> The good thing is, at transaction time, we have no other interruption or
> concurrency, account can be quite accurate and only need to account once
> for every dirty extent.(especially faster for shared extents)
>
> And clearer codes and logic. Codes changes from 1K to 0.5K, even a lot
> of comments are added.
>
> With the patchset, btrfs can pass all qgroup test in fstests.
> No longer minus number now.
>
> The only problem left is, we need a new mechanism to account subvolume deletion. But this is the long-existing problem, I'd prefer to address
> it in next merge windows if we have a pretty method to solve it.
>
> Or maybe a small patch to mark qgroup inconsistent when delete subvolume with level higher than 0.
>
> 2. write-rm-loop fixes from Zhao Lei.
> Other patches from Zhao Lei and Forrest Liu have already been merged
> into mainline, but this is the one still unmerged.
>
> This patch fixes the last super rare problem we found in write-rm-loop
> case.
> And the patch will only modify the minor routine, so it won't affect the normal routine.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-09 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 3:06 [GIT PULL] Qgroup rework with other Fujitsu fix Qu Wenruo
2015-06-09 6:03 ` Wang Shilong [this message]
2015-06-09 7:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-06-24 6:54 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-06-09 14:10 ` Josef Bacik
[not found] ` <CAFy8SQW58c7DUUod7FaiNtY2MaoY6ZYt3jacG-RQHJZx+4so7A@mail.gmail.com>
2015-06-09 14:54 ` Josef Bacik
2015-06-10 0:33 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-06-10 0:33 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-06-10 20:45 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557681C6.7050608@gmail.com \
--to=wangshilong1991@gmail.com \
--cc=adam900710@gmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox