From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
Btrfs mailing list <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug/regression: Read-only mount not read-only
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:06:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565EB480.4010509@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201512021725.32750.russell@coker.com.au>
Russell Coker wrote on 2015/12/02 17:25 +1100:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:05:09 AM Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> yes, xfs does; we have "-o norecovery" if you don't want that, or need
>> to mount a filesystem with a dirty log on a readonly device.
>
> That option also works with Ext3/4 so it seems to be a standard way of dealing
> with this. I think that BTRFS should do what Ext3/4 and XFS do in this
> regard.
>
BTW, does -o norecovery implies -o ro?
If not, how does it keep the filesystem consistent?
I'd like to follow that ext2/xfs behavior, but I'm not familiar with
those filesystems.
Thanks,
Qu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-28 13:46 Bug/regression: Read-only mount not read-only Hugo Mills
2015-11-30 14:59 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-30 15:28 ` Hugo Mills
2015-11-30 16:00 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-30 16:48 ` Chris Mason
2015-11-30 17:06 ` Hugo Mills
2015-12-01 19:00 ` Chris Mason
2015-12-01 19:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-12-02 6:25 ` Russell Coker
2015-12-02 9:06 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-12-02 9:23 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-12-02 16:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-12-02 17:48 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-12-02 18:53 ` Hugo Mills
2015-12-02 22:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-12-02 23:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-12-02 23:51 ` Hugo Mills
2015-12-03 6:44 ` Duncan
2015-12-04 12:32 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-12-04 12:23 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-30 17:08 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-12-01 6:46 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-12-01 18:54 ` Chris Mason
2015-12-01 23:47 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565EB480.4010509@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=russell@coker.com.au \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox