From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: statfs: Don't reset f_bavail if we're over committing metadata space
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 07:14:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bd8edb4-8315-31b7-4b43-af42b787ad1d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38a5dc98-7233-0252-4ba3-76c59d7b21e7@toxicpanda.com>
On 1/31/20 5:05 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On 1/14/20 10:41 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> [BUG]
>> When there are a lot of metadata space reserved, e.g. after balancing a
>> data block with many extents, vanilla df would report 0 available space.
>>
>> [CAUSE]
>> btrfs_statfs() would report 0 available space if its metadata space is
>> exhausted.
>> And the calculation is based on currently reserved space vs on-disk
>> available space, with a small headroom as buffer.
>> When there is not enough headroom, btrfs_statfs() will report 0
>> available space.
>>
>> The problem is, since commit ef1317a1b9a3 ("btrfs: do not allow
>> reservations if we have pending tickets"), we allow btrfs to over commit
>> metadata space, as long as we have enough space to allocate new metadata
>> chunks.
>>
>> This makes old calculation unreliable and report false 0 available space.
>>
>> [FIX]
>> Don't do such naive check anymore for btrfs_statfs().
>> Also remove the comment about "0 available space when metadata is
>> exhausted".
>>
>> Please note that, this is a just a quick fix. There are still a lot of
>> things to be improved.
>>
>> Fixes: ef1317a1b9a3 ("btrfs: do not allow reservations if we have
>> pending tickets")
>
> This isn't the patch that broke it. The patch that broke it is the
> patch that introduced this code in the first place.
>
> And this isn't the proper fix either, because technically we have 0
> available if we don't have enough space for our global reserve _and_ we
> don't have any unallocated space. So for now the best "quick" fix would
> be to make the condition something like
> if (!mixed && block-rsv->space_info->full &&
Makes sense. I didn't realize we have space_info::full I was
experimenting create btrfs_calc_avail_data_space() (which we use
few lines above in this function) for type metadata.
This issue is easy to reproduce as below.
mkfs.btrfs -fq -n64K -msingle /dev/sdb && mount /dev/sdb /btrfs && df
-k /btrfs
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb 3072000 13824 0 100% /btrfs
So xfstests using _get_available_space() with MKFS_OPTS="-m single"
option is failing.
Unfortunately, revert of patch 0096420adb03 (btrfs: do not account
global reserve in can_overcommit) also fixes this, I don't know yet
how and why yet. Any idea?
As because whats happening for the test case above, is
%found->disk_total is 8388608 (for single) but the %block_rsv->size is
13631488 (for nodesize 64K). So the condition fails. The
%block_rev->size scales with nodesize, where as %found->disk_total
doesn't, so with default nodesize 16K this problem isn't reproducible.
Thanks, Anand
> total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
> Thanks,
>
> Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-30 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 3:41 [PATCH] btrfs: statfs: Don't reset f_bavail if we're over committing metadata space Qu Wenruo
2020-01-15 11:40 ` Qu WenRuo
2020-01-16 14:29 ` David Sterba
2020-01-17 0:54 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-17 1:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-17 14:10 ` David Sterba
2020-01-17 14:22 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-29 15:38 ` David Sterba
2020-01-17 14:02 ` David Sterba
2020-01-17 14:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-29 16:01 ` David Sterba
2020-01-31 2:23 ` Zygo Blaxell
2020-01-30 21:05 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-30 23:14 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2020-01-31 0:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-31 11:58 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-31 12:34 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bd8edb4-8315-31b7-4b43-af42b787ad1d@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox