From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: statfs: Don't reset f_bavail if we're over committing metadata space
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:58:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f977eec9-afec-9270-c6bc-b19730cfccf9@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5fe1d568-9c6b-7fcd-5d82-04738dc64b4c@gmx.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2443 bytes --]
On 2020/1/31 上午8:35, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/1/31 上午5:05, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On 1/14/20 10:41 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> [BUG]
>>> When there are a lot of metadata space reserved, e.g. after balancing a
>>> data block with many extents, vanilla df would report 0 available space.
>>>
>>> [CAUSE]
>>> btrfs_statfs() would report 0 available space if its metadata space is
>>> exhausted.
>>> And the calculation is based on currently reserved space vs on-disk
>>> available space, with a small headroom as buffer.
>>> When there is not enough headroom, btrfs_statfs() will report 0
>>> available space.
>>>
>>> The problem is, since commit ef1317a1b9a3 ("btrfs: do not allow
>>> reservations if we have pending tickets"), we allow btrfs to over commit
>>> metadata space, as long as we have enough space to allocate new metadata
>>> chunks.
>>>
>>> This makes old calculation unreliable and report false 0 available space.
>>>
>>> [FIX]
>>> Don't do such naive check anymore for btrfs_statfs().
>>> Also remove the comment about "0 available space when metadata is
>>> exhausted".
>>>
>>> Please note that, this is a just a quick fix. There are still a lot of
>>> things to be improved.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ef1317a1b9a3 ("btrfs: do not allow reservations if we have
>>> pending tickets")
>>
>> This isn't the patch that broke it. The patch that broke it is the
>> patch that introduced this code in the first place.
>>
>> And this isn't the proper fix either, because technically we have 0
>> available if we don't have enough space for our global reserve _and_ we
>> don't have any unallocated space. So for now the best "quick" fix would
>> be to make the condition something like
>>
>> if (!mixed && block-rsv->space_info->full &&
>> total_free_meta - thresh < block_rsv->size)
>
> block-rsv->space_info->full is not reliable afaik.
My bad, I should double check the code before writing bullsh**.
That full is set as long as we can't allocate a new chunk for that profile.
So that fix is pretty good.
I'll update the patch to use Josef's credit.
Thanks,
Qu
>
> For metadata we will never really reach full space info.
>
> Anyway, the patch is already discarded since it doesn't make sense if
> the patch can't reach v5.5.
>
> The proper fix in the per-profile will be the fix.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Josef
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-31 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 3:41 [PATCH] btrfs: statfs: Don't reset f_bavail if we're over committing metadata space Qu Wenruo
2020-01-15 11:40 ` Qu WenRuo
2020-01-16 14:29 ` David Sterba
2020-01-17 0:54 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-17 1:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-17 14:10 ` David Sterba
2020-01-17 14:22 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-29 15:38 ` David Sterba
2020-01-17 14:02 ` David Sterba
2020-01-17 14:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-29 16:01 ` David Sterba
2020-01-31 2:23 ` Zygo Blaxell
2020-01-30 21:05 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-30 23:14 ` Anand Jain
2020-01-31 0:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-31 11:58 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-01-31 12:34 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f977eec9-afec-9270-c6bc-b19730cfccf9@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox