From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] btrfs: track running balance in a simpler way
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:52:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ab5bdc1-45a2-d0a4-cdc7-587731c4103a@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d512cf2c8f825592703ee0d45c51f22396e6078.1524146556.git.dsterba@suse.com>
On 04/20/2018 12:33 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> Currently fs_info::balance_running is 0 or 1 and does not use the
> semantics of atomics. The pause and cancel check for 0, that can happen
> only after __btrfs_balance exits for whatever reason.
>
> Parallel calls to balance ioctl may enter btrfs_ioctl_balance multiple
> times but will block on the balance_mutex that protects the
> fs_info::flags bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 6 +++++-
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 -
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 6 +++---
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index 011cb9a8a967..fda94a264eb7 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -726,6 +726,11 @@ struct btrfs_delayed_root;
> * (device replace, resize, device add/delete, balance)
> */
> #define BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP 16
> +/*
> + * Indicate that balance has been set up from the ioctl and is in the main
> + * phase. The fs_info::balance_ctl is initialized.
> + */
> +#define BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING 17
Change looks good to me as such and its a good idea to drop
fs_info::balance_running;
However instead of making BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING part of
btrfs_fs_info::flags
pls make it part of
btrfs_balance_control::flags
Because:
We already have BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME there.
And at fs_info level BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP tells someone excl is running.
And if its a balance (either in running or implicit-paused state)
then btrfs_fs_info::balance_ctl is not NULL.
Thanks, Anand
>
> struct btrfs_fs_info {
> u8 fsid[BTRFS_FSID_SIZE];
> @@ -991,7 +996,6 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
> /* restriper state */
> spinlock_t balance_lock;
> struct mutex balance_mutex;
> - atomic_t balance_running;
> atomic_t balance_pause_req;
> atomic_t balance_cancel_req;
> struct btrfs_balance_control *balance_ctl;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index c0482ecea11f..b62559dfb053 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -2168,7 +2168,6 @@ static void btrfs_init_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> {
> spin_lock_init(&fs_info->balance_lock);
> mutex_init(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> - atomic_set(&fs_info->balance_running, 0);
> atomic_set(&fs_info->balance_pause_req, 0);
> atomic_set(&fs_info->balance_cancel_req, 0);
> fs_info->balance_ctl = NULL;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 7c99f74c200e..3dfd5ab2807b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -4506,7 +4506,7 @@ void update_ioctl_balance_args(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int lock,
>
> bargs->flags = bctl->flags;
>
> - if (atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running))
> + if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags))
> bargs->state |= BTRFS_BALANCE_STATE_RUNNING;
> if (atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_pause_req))
> bargs->state |= BTRFS_BALANCE_STATE_PAUSE_REQ;
> @@ -4558,7 +4558,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_balance(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
> mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> if (fs_info->balance_ctl) {
> /* this is either (2) or (3) */
> - if (!atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running)) {
> + if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> /*
> * Lock released to allow other waiters to continue,
> @@ -4567,7 +4567,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_balance(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
> mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
>
> if (fs_info->balance_ctl &&
> - !atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running)) {
> + !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
> /* this is (3) */
> need_unlock = false;
> goto locked;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index e95cc2f09fdd..a766d2f988c1 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -3886,13 +3886,14 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
> spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
> }
>
> - atomic_inc(&fs_info->balance_running);
> + ASSERT(!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
> + set_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags);
> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
>
> ret = __btrfs_balance(fs_info);
>
> mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> - atomic_dec(&fs_info->balance_running);
> + clear_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags);
>
> if (bargs) {
> memset(bargs, 0, sizeof(*bargs));
> @@ -4031,16 +4032,16 @@ int btrfs_pause_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> return -ENOTCONN;
> }
>
> - if (atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running)) {
> + if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
> atomic_inc(&fs_info->balance_pause_req);
> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
>
> wait_event(fs_info->balance_wait_q,
> - atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running) == 0);
> + !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
>
> mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> /* we are good with balance_ctl ripped off from under us */
> - BUG_ON(atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running));
> + BUG_ON(test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
> atomic_dec(&fs_info->balance_pause_req);
> } else {
> ret = -ENOTCONN;
> @@ -4066,10 +4067,10 @@ int btrfs_cancel_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> * if we are running just wait and return, balance item is
> * deleted in btrfs_balance in this case
> */
> - if (atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running)) {
> + if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> wait_event(fs_info->balance_wait_q,
> - atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running) == 0);
> + !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
> mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> } else {
> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> @@ -4085,7 +4086,8 @@ int btrfs_cancel_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> }
> }
>
> - BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl || atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_running));
> + BUG_ON(fs_info->balance_ctl ||
> + test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags));
> atomic_dec(&fs_info->balance_cancel_req);
> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
> return 0;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-20 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 16:33 [PATCH v2 00/16] Kill fs_info::volume_mutex David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] btrfs: squeeze btrfs_dev_replace_continue_on_mount to its caller David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] btrfs: make success path out of btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev more clear David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] btrfs: export and rename free_device David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] btrfs: move btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev to dev-replace.c and make static David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] btrfs: move volume_mutex to callers of btrfs_rm_device David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] btrfs: move clearing of EXCL_OP out of __cancel_balance David Sterba
2018-04-20 7:02 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-20 7:35 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] btrfs: add proper safety check before resuming dev-replace David Sterba
2018-04-20 7:04 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-20 7:36 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] btrfs: add sanity check when resuming balance after mount David Sterba
2018-04-20 7:38 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] btrfs: cleanup helpers that reset balance state David Sterba
2018-04-20 7:07 ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-04-20 11:28 ` David Sterba
2018-04-20 9:04 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] btrfs: remove wrong use of volume_mutex from btrfs_dev_replace_start David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] btrfs: kill btrfs_fs_info::volume_mutex David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] btrfs: track running balance in a simpler way David Sterba
2018-04-20 7:52 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2018-04-20 11:58 ` David Sterba
2018-04-20 12:19 ` David Sterba
2018-04-20 13:32 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-27 2:10 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-27 16:10 ` David Sterba
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] btrfs: move and comment read-only check in btrfs_cancel_balance David Sterba
2018-04-20 9:13 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-20 11:59 ` David Sterba
2018-04-20 12:06 ` [PATCH v2.1 " David Sterba
2018-04-27 2:02 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] btrfs: drop lock parameter from update_ioctl_balance_args and rename David Sterba
2018-04-20 9:21 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] btrfs: use mutex in btrfs_resume_balance_async David Sterba
2018-04-20 9:25 ` Anand Jain
2018-04-19 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] btrfs: open code set_balance_control David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ab5bdc1-45a2-d0a4-cdc7-587731c4103a@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox