Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] btrfs: remove extent_map::orig_start member

[Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>]

在 2024/5/13 22:39, Filipe Manana 写道:
[...]
>> @@ -861,7 +857,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(btrfs_add_block_group,
>>                  { BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF,   "DROP_DELAYED_REF" },       \
>>                  { BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_EXTENT, "ADD_DELAYED_EXTENT" },     \
>>                  { BTRFS_UPDATE_DELAYED_HEAD, "UPDATE_DELAYED_HEAD" })
>> -
>> +
>
> Unrelated white space change. Please avoid that.

That seems to be caused by clangd lsp server.

I have no idea why it automatically cleaned up the whitespace problems
every time I modified the header file.
And IIRC it's not the first time it's doing this.

I'd better find a way to disable the auto fix.

Thanks,
Qu
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>>   DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs_delayed_tree_ref,
>>
>> @@ -873,7 +869,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs_delayed_tree_ref,
>>          TP_STRUCT__entry_btrfs(
>>                  __field(        u64,  bytenr            )
>>                  __field(        u64,  num_bytes         )
>> -               __field(        int,  action            )
>> +               __field(        int,  action            )
>>                  __field(        u64,  parent            )
>>                  __field(        u64,  ref_root          )
>>                  __field(        int,  level             )
>> @@ -930,7 +926,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs_delayed_data_ref,
>>          TP_STRUCT__entry_btrfs(
>>                  __field(        u64,  bytenr            )
>>                  __field(        u64,  num_bytes         )
>> -               __field(        int,  action            )
>> +               __field(        int,  action            )
>>                  __field(        u64,  parent            )
>>                  __field(        u64,  ref_root          )
>>                  __field(        u64,  owner             )
>> @@ -992,7 +988,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs_delayed_ref_head,
>>          TP_STRUCT__entry_btrfs(
>>                  __field(        u64,  bytenr            )
>>                  __field(        u64,  num_bytes         )
>> -               __field(        int,  action            )
>> +               __field(        int,  action            )
>>                  __field(        int,  is_data           )
>>          ),
>>
>> --
>> 2.45.0
>>
>>
>