From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: always uses root memcgroup for filemap_add_folio()
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:50:40 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78c6787c-0ddb-4c9a-b235-323f6133941a@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99334ebf-583a-4295-be52-118c253d5fca@gmx.com>
在 2024/7/19 16:46, Qu Wenruo 写道:
>
>
> 在 2024/7/19 16:38, Michal Hocko 写道:
>> On Fri 19-07-24 14:19:05, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> [...]
>>> @@ -2981,8 +2982,17 @@ static int attach_eb_folio_to_filemap(struct
>>> extent_buffer *eb, int i,
>>> ASSERT(eb->folios[i]);
>>>
>>> retry:
>>> + /*
>>> + * Btree inode is a btrfs internal inode, and not exposed to any
>>> + * user.
>>> + * Furthermore we do not want any cgroup limits on this inode.
>>> + * So we always use root_mem_cgroup as our active memcg when
>>> attaching
>>> + * the folios.
>>> + */
>>> + old_memcg = set_active_memcg(root_mem_cgroup);
>>> ret = filemap_add_folio(mapping, eb->folios[i], index + i,
>>> GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>>> + set_active_memcg(old_memcg);
>>
>> I do not think this will compile with CONFIG_MEMCG=n
>
> My bad.
>
> I'll fix it from the btrfs part so that @root_mem_cgroup would be
> changed to NULL for the CONFIG_MEMCG=n case.
>
> Meanwhile, can we just define root_mem_cgroup as NULL globally?
Of course, I mean for the CONFIG_MEMCG=n case.
Thanks,
Qu
> That looks more reasonable to me, and if that's fine I can send out an
> extra patch just for that.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>>
>>> if (!ret)
>>> goto finish;
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.45.2
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-19 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 4:49 [PATCH v5 0/2] btrfs: try to allocate larger folios for metadata Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 4:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: always uses root memcgroup for filemap_add_folio() Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 7:08 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-19 7:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-07-19 7:20 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2024-07-19 7:26 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-19 15:42 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-19 15:42 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-19 4:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: prefer to allocate larger folio for metadata Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78c6787c-0ddb-4c9a-b235-323f6133941a@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox