From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 19/20] btrfs: volumes: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty()
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:06:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <932b0c07f2d8a7ea4e7dd52eb71545490346ad2b.1734527445.git.fdmanana@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1734527445.git.fdmanana@suse.com>
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 12 +-----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index d32913c51d69..7975d0d1236c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2046,7 +2046,6 @@ static int btrfs_add_dev_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
ptr = btrfs_device_fsid(dev_item);
write_extent_buffer(leaf, trans->fs_info->fs_devices->metadata_uuid,
ptr, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE);
- btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf);
ret = 0;
out:
@@ -2742,11 +2741,9 @@ static int btrfs_finish_sprout(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
device = btrfs_find_device(fs_info->fs_devices, &args);
BUG_ON(!device); /* Logic error */
- if (device->fs_devices->seeding) {
+ if (device->fs_devices->seeding)
btrfs_set_device_generation(leaf, dev_item,
device->generation);
- btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf);
- }
path->slots[0]++;
goto next_slot;
@@ -3039,8 +3036,6 @@ static noinline int btrfs_update_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
btrfs_device_get_disk_total_bytes(device));
btrfs_set_device_bytes_used(leaf, dev_item,
btrfs_device_get_bytes_used(device));
- btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf);
-
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
@@ -3749,10 +3744,7 @@ static int insert_balance_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
btrfs_set_balance_meta(leaf, item, &disk_bargs);
btrfs_cpu_balance_args_to_disk(&disk_bargs, &bctl->sys);
btrfs_set_balance_sys(leaf, item, &disk_bargs);
-
btrfs_set_balance_flags(leaf, item, bctl->flags);
-
- btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf);
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
err = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
@@ -7746,8 +7738,6 @@ static int update_dev_stat_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_DEV_STAT_VALUES_MAX; i++)
btrfs_set_dev_stats_value(eb, ptr, i,
btrfs_dev_stat_read(device, i));
- btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, eb);
-
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 17:06 [PATCH 00/20] btrfs: remove plenty of redundant btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() calls fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 01/20] btrfs: tree-log: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 02/20] btrfs: free-space-tree: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 03/20] btrfs: extent-tree: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 04/20] btrfs: block-group: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 05/20] btrfs: delayed-inode: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 06/20] btrfs: dev-replace: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/20] btrfs: dir-item: remove unnecessary calls " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 08/20] btrfs: file: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 09/20] btrfs: file-item: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 10/20] btrfs: free-space-cache: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 11/20] btrfs: inode: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 12/20] btrfs: inode-item: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 13/20] btrfs: ioctl: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 14/20] btrfs: qgroup: remove unnecessary calls " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 15/20] btrfs: raid-stripe-tree: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 16/20] btrfs: relocation: remove unnecessary calls " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 17/20] btrfs: root-tree: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 18/20] btrfs: uuid-tree: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` fdmanana [this message]
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 20/20] btrfs: xattr: " fdmanana
2024-12-19 7:43 ` [PATCH 00/20] btrfs: remove plenty of redundant btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() calls Johannes Thumshirn
2024-12-23 20:08 ` David Sterba
2025-01-06 10:54 ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-06 14:19 ` David Sterba
2025-01-06 15:43 ` Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=932b0c07f2d8a7ea4e7dd52eb71545490346ad2b.1734527445.git.fdmanana@suse.com \
--to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox