public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 16/20] btrfs: relocation: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty()
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:06:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9e0b2e377aa364faefc7d4d0607ffe38881981e.1734527445.git.fdmanana@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1734527445.git.fdmanana@suse.com>

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.

These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index cdd9a7b15a11..d4100e58172f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -856,7 +856,6 @@ int replace_file_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	u32 i;
 	int ret = 0;
 	int first = 1;
-	int dirty = 0;
 
 	if (rc->stage != UPDATE_DATA_PTRS)
 		return 0;
@@ -936,7 +935,6 @@ int replace_file_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		}
 
 		btrfs_set_file_extent_disk_bytenr(leaf, fi, new_bytenr);
-		dirty = 1;
 
 		key.offset -= btrfs_file_extent_offset(leaf, fi);
 		ref.action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF;
@@ -967,8 +965,6 @@ int replace_file_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	if (dirty)
-		btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf);
 	if (inode)
 		btrfs_add_delayed_iput(inode);
 	return ret;
@@ -1161,13 +1157,11 @@ int replace_path(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct reloc_control *rc,
 		 */
 		btrfs_set_node_blockptr(parent, slot, new_bytenr);
 		btrfs_set_node_ptr_generation(parent, slot, new_ptr_gen);
-		btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, parent);
 
 		btrfs_set_node_blockptr(path->nodes[level],
 					path->slots[level], old_bytenr);
 		btrfs_set_node_ptr_generation(path->nodes[level],
 					      path->slots[level], old_ptr_gen);
-		btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, path->nodes[level]);
 
 		ref.action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF;
 		ref.bytenr = old_bytenr;
@@ -3728,7 +3722,6 @@ static int __insert_orphan_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	btrfs_set_inode_mode(leaf, item, S_IFREG | 0600);
 	btrfs_set_inode_flags(leaf, item, BTRFS_INODE_NOCOMPRESS |
 					  BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC);
-	btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf);
 out:
 	btrfs_free_path(path);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-18 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-18 17:06 [PATCH 00/20] btrfs: remove plenty of redundant btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() calls fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 01/20] btrfs: tree-log: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 02/20] btrfs: free-space-tree: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 03/20] btrfs: extent-tree: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 04/20] btrfs: block-group: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 05/20] btrfs: delayed-inode: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 06/20] btrfs: dev-replace: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/20] btrfs: dir-item: remove unnecessary calls " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 08/20] btrfs: file: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 09/20] btrfs: file-item: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 10/20] btrfs: free-space-cache: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 11/20] btrfs: inode: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 12/20] btrfs: inode-item: " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 13/20] btrfs: ioctl: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 14/20] btrfs: qgroup: remove unnecessary calls " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 15/20] btrfs: raid-stripe-tree: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` fdmanana [this message]
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 17/20] btrfs: root-tree: remove unnecessary calls " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 18/20] btrfs: uuid-tree: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 19/20] btrfs: volumes: remove unnecessary calls " fdmanana
2024-12-18 17:06 ` [PATCH 20/20] btrfs: xattr: remove unnecessary call " fdmanana
2024-12-19  7:43 ` [PATCH 00/20] btrfs: remove plenty of redundant btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() calls Johannes Thumshirn
2024-12-23 20:08 ` David Sterba
2025-01-06 10:54   ` Filipe Manana
2025-01-06 14:19     ` David Sterba
2025-01-06 15:43       ` Filipe Manana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9e0b2e377aa364faefc7d4d0607ffe38881981e.1734527445.git.fdmanana@suse.com \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox