From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@fb.com" <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] btrfs: index free space entries on size
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:37:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZfEt/i0E87N+FmG@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR04MB7416BDFF1C613094C64689639B9C9@PH0PR04MB7416.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:52:38AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 18/11/2021 22:33, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * This is a little subtle. We *only* have ->max_extent_size set if we actually
> > + * searched through the bitmap and figured out the largest ->max_extent_size,
> > + * otherwise it's 0. In the case that it's 0 we don't want to tell the
> > + * allocator the wrong thing, we want to use the actual real max_extent_size
> > + * we've found already if it's larger, or we want to use ->bytes.
> > + *
> > + * This matters because find_free_space() will skip entries who's ->bytes is
> > + * less than the required bytes. So if we didn't search down this bitmap, we
> > + * may pick some previous entry that has a smaller ->max_extent_size than we
> > + * have. For example, assume we have two entries, one that has
> > + * ->max_extent_size set to 4k and ->bytes set to 1M. A second entry hasn't set
> > + * ->max_extent_size yet, has ->bytes set to 8k and it's contiguous. We will
> > + * call into find_free_space(), and return with max_extent_size == 4k, because
> > + * that first bitmap entry had ->max_extent_size set, but the second one did
> > + * not. If instead we returned 8k we'd come in searching for 8k, and find the
> > + * 8k contiguous range.
> > + *
> > + * Consider the other case, we have 2 8k chunks in that second entry and still
> > + * don't have ->max_extent_size set. We'll return 16k, and the next time the
> > + * allocator comes in it'll fully search our second bitmap, and this time it'll
> > + * get an uptodate value of 8k as the maximum chunk size. Then we'll get the
> > + * right allocation the next loop through.
> > + */
> > +static inline u64 get_max_extent_size(const struct btrfs_free_space *entry)
> > +{
> > + if (entry->bitmap && entry->max_extent_size)
> > + return entry->max_extent_size;
> > + return entry->bytes;
> > +}
>
> This part is also present in
> [PATCH v5 1/3] btrfs: only use ->max_extent_size if it is set in the bitmap
Yeah I moved it up here, you'll see the removal lower down in the patch.
Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-18 21:33 [PATCH v5 0/3] Index free space entries on size Josef Bacik
2021-11-18 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] btrfs: only use ->max_extent_size if it is set in the bitmap Josef Bacik
2021-11-18 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] btrfs: index free space entries on size Josef Bacik
2021-11-19 10:52 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-11-19 15:37 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2021-11-18 21:33 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] btrfs: add self test for bytes_index free space cache Josef Bacik
2021-11-22 17:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Index free space entries on size David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZfEt/i0E87N+FmG@localhost.localdomain \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox