From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>,
clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, josef@toxicpanda.com
Cc: syzbot+a0d1f7e26910be4dc171@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
fdmanana@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: qgroup: fix slab-out-of-bounds in btrfs_qgroup_inherit
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:40:23 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0840520-929a-4973-8ce9-91db07d6a9ec@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240624030720.137753-1-aha310510@gmail.com>
在 2024/6/24 12:37, Jeongjun Park 写道:
> If a value exists in inherit->num_ref_copies or inherit->num_excl_copies,
> an out-of-bounds vulnerability occurs.
>
Thanks for the fix.
Although I'm still not 100% sure what's going wrong.
The original report
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000bc19ba061a67ca77@google.com/T/)
is showing a backtrace when creating snapshot.
In that case they should all go through __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create(), and
since it has qgroup_inherit, it can only come from
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2().
But in that function, we have just called btrfs_qgroup_check_inherit()
function and it already has the check on num_ref_copies/num_excl_copies.
So in that case it should not even happen.
I think the root cause is why the existing btrfs_qgroup_check_inherit()
doesn't catch the problem in the first place.
Thanks,
Qu
> Therefore, you need to add code to check the presence or absence of
> that value.
>
> Regards.
> Jeongjun Park.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+a0d1f7e26910be4dc171@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 3f5e2d3b3877 ("Btrfs: fix missing check in the btrfs_qgroup_inherit()")
> Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b /fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> index fc2a7ea26354..23beac746637 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> @@ -3270,6 +3270,10 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_inherit(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 srcid,
> }
>
> if (inherit) {
> + if (inherit->num_ref_copies > 0 || inherit->num_excl_copies > 0) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> i_qgroups = (u64 *)(inherit + 1);
> nums = inherit->num_qgroups + 2 * inherit->num_ref_copies +
> 2 * inherit->num_excl_copies;
> --
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-24 3:07 [PATCH] btrfs: qgroup: fix slab-out-of-bounds in btrfs_qgroup_inherit Jeongjun Park
2024-06-24 5:10 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2024-06-24 5:40 ` Qu Wenruo
[not found] ` <CAO9qdTEJaM=gEgQJLXuhKnh2jNA2KPyU9b4_kMWn6YNa3CU4SQ@mail.gmail.com>
2024-06-24 6:41 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-06-28 1:21 ` Jeongjun Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0840520-929a-4973-8ce9-91db07d6a9ec@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=aha310510@gmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+a0d1f7e26910be4dc171@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox