* [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction in do_remap_reloc_trans() on failure
@ 2026-04-07 16:16 Mark Harmstone
2026-04-07 21:31 ` Boris Burkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Harmstone @ 2026-04-07 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: Mark Harmstone
If one of the calls made by do_remap_reloc_trans() fails, we can leave
the remap tree in an inconsistent state. Abort the transaction if this
happens, to prevent the corrupt state from reaching the disk.
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index 1c42c5180bddd5..277a0042967665 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -5089,6 +5089,7 @@ static int do_remap_reloc_trans(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
btrfs_free_reserved_extent(fs_info, new_addr, length, 0);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->remap_mutex);
+ btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
return ret;
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction in do_remap_reloc_trans() on failure
2026-04-07 16:16 [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction in do_remap_reloc_trans() on failure Mark Harmstone
@ 2026-04-07 21:31 ` Boris Burkov
2026-04-08 16:59 ` Mark Harmstone
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Boris Burkov @ 2026-04-07 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Harmstone; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 05:16:56PM +0100, Mark Harmstone wrote:
> If one of the calls made by do_remap_reloc_trans() fails, we can leave
> the remap tree in an inconsistent state. Abort the transaction if this
> happens, to prevent the corrupt state from reaching the disk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> index 1c42c5180bddd5..277a0042967665 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> @@ -5089,6 +5089,7 @@ static int do_remap_reloc_trans(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> btrfs_free_reserved_extent(fs_info, new_addr, length, 0);
>
> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->remap_mutex);
> + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
Counterintuitively to the usual pattern of sharing code in fail: labels,
I think it is quite nice to put a separate abort at each failing code
path that requires an abort. That way we get better diagnostic
information on what actually went wrong.
e.g. a recent patch from Filipe unfolding it across a function call:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/99743ac0b4b9a69dcaa8f9adcaf301bd1a0f1a89.1769163248.git.fdmanana@suse.com/
Thanks,
Boris
> btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.52.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction in do_remap_reloc_trans() on failure
2026-04-07 21:31 ` Boris Burkov
@ 2026-04-08 16:59 ` Mark Harmstone
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Harmstone @ 2026-04-08 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boris Burkov; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On 07/04/2026 10.31 pm, Boris Burkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 05:16:56PM +0100, Mark Harmstone wrote:
>> If one of the calls made by do_remap_reloc_trans() fails, we can leave
>> the remap tree in an inconsistent state. Abort the transaction if this
>> happens, to prevent the corrupt state from reaching the disk.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> index 1c42c5180bddd5..277a0042967665 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
>> @@ -5089,6 +5089,7 @@ static int do_remap_reloc_trans(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>> btrfs_free_reserved_extent(fs_info, new_addr, length, 0);
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&fs_info->remap_mutex);
>> + btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
>
> Counterintuitively to the usual pattern of sharing code in fail: labels,
> I think it is quite nice to put a separate abort at each failing code
> path that requires an abort. That way we get better diagnostic
> information on what actually went wrong.
>
> e.g. a recent patch from Filipe unfolding it across a function call:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/99743ac0b4b9a69dcaa8f9adcaf301bd1a0f1a89.1769163248.git.fdmanana@suse.com/
Thanks Boris - if aborting a transaction logs the line number, that's a
very good reason to do it in place. This also shows that the call to
btrfs_add_to_free_space_tree after add_remap_entry fails is pointless,
as the transaction is about to be aborted.
> Thanks,
> Boris
>
>> btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
>>
>> return ret;
>> --
>> 2.52.0
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-08 16:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-07 16:16 [PATCH] btrfs: abort transaction in do_remap_reloc_trans() on failure Mark Harmstone
2026-04-07 21:31 ` Boris Burkov
2026-04-08 16:59 ` Mark Harmstone
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox