Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: introduce force_cow_in_new_chunk()
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:51:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c70b76c8-61c8-999a-158f-667fa9c86b5f@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <399b00c9-3ab5-e777-a69d-4cbaf3641ddb@gmx.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5806 bytes --]



On 2017年12月20日 16:37, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2017年12月20日 16:21, Su Yue wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/20/2017 01:41 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017年12月20日 12:57, Su Yue wrote:
>>>> Introduce create_chunk_and_block_block_group() to allocate new chunk
>>>> and corresponding block group.
>>>>
>>>> The new function force_cow_in_new_chunk() first allocates new chunk
>>>> and records its start.
>>>> Then it modifies all metadata block groups cached and full.
>>>> Finally it marks the new block group uncached and unfree.
>>>> In the next CoW, extents states will be updated automatically by
>>>> cache_block_group().
>>>>
>>>> Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   cmds-check.c | 80
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
>>>> index d98d4bda7357..311c8a9f45e8 100644
>>>> --- a/cmds-check.c
>>>> +++ b/cmds-check.c
>>>> @@ -10911,6 +10911,86 @@ out:
>>>>       return ret;
>>>>   }
>>>>   +static int create_chunk_and_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info
>>>> *fs_info,
>>>> +                    u64 flags, u64 *start, u64 *nbytes)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
>>>> +    struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->extent_root;
>>>> +    int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if ((flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0)
>>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> +    trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1);
>>>> +    if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
>>>> +        ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
>>>> +        error("error starting transaction %s", strerror(-ret));
>>>> +        return ret;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    ret = btrfs_alloc_chunk(trans, fs_info, start, nbytes, flags);
>>>> +    if (ret) {
>>>> +        error("fail to allocate new chunk %s", strerror(-ret));
>>>> +        goto out;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    ret = btrfs_make_block_group(trans, fs_info, 0, flags,
>>>> +                 BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID, *start, *nbytes);
>>>> +    if (ret) {
>>>> +        error("fail to make block group for chunk %llu %llu %s",
>>>> +              *start, *nbytes, strerror(-ret));
>>>> +        goto out;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +out:
>>>> +    btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root);
>>>> +    return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int force_cow_in_new_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    struct btrfs_block_group_cache *bg;
>>>> +    u64 start;
>>>> +    u64 nbytes;
>>>> +    u64 alloc_profile;
>>>> +    u64 flags;
>>>> +    int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +    alloc_profile = (fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits &
>>>> +             fs_info->metadata_alloc_profile);
>>>> +    flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | alloc_profile;
>>>> +    if (btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, MIXED_GROUPS))
>>>> +        flags |= BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA;
>>>> +
>>>> +    ret = create_chunk_and_block_group(fs_info, flags, &start,
>>>> &nbytes);
>>>
>>> Why bother allocating a new chunk by yourself?
>>>
>>> Just mark all block groups full and that's all.
>>>
>>> Any later tree block allocation like btrfs_search_slot() with @cow = 1
>>> will trigger chunk allocation automatically.
>>>
>>
>> Tried to let it happen but BUG_ON with -ENOSPC.
> 
> Then fix it.
> 
> It's not a normal behavior in this case.
> 
> Thanks,
> Qu

And I think the fix to allow btrfs_reserve_extent() to allocate new
chunk will solve a lot of strange BUG_ON().

it just occurred to me that, a lot of use cases relies on the assumption
that btrfs_reserve_extent() will try to allocate new chunks.

Especially for case like convert, certain btrfs check --repair, some
rescue tools.

So this would be a quite nice start point for such fix.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
>> Do you mean do_chunk_alloc() in btrfs_reserve_extent() which is called
>> while doing CoW?> In progs, allocation of new chunk during CoW depends @root->ref_cows.
>> However, @root->ref_cows should be set only if @root is root of a fs
>> trees.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Su
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>
>>>> +    if (!ret)
>>>> +        printf("Create new chunk %llu %llu\n", start, nbytes);
>>>> +    else
>>>> +        goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +    flags = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA;
>>>> +    /* Mark all metadata block groups cached and full in free space*/
>>>> +    ret = modify_block_groups_cache(fs_info, flags, 1);
>>>> +    if (ret)
>>>> +        goto clear_bg_cache;
>>>> +
>>>> +    bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, start);
>>>> +    if (!bg) {
>>>> +        ret = -ENOENT;
>>>> +        error("fail to look up block group %llu %llu", start, nbytes);
>>>> +        goto clear_bg_cache;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* Clear block group cache just allocated */
>>>> +    ret = modify_block_group_cache(fs_info, bg, 0);
>>>> +    if (ret)
>>>> +        goto clear_bg_cache;
>>>> +
>>>> +    return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +clear_bg_cache:
>>>> +    modify_block_groups_cache(fs_info, flags, 0);
>>>> +err:
>>>> +    return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>   static int check_extent_refs(struct btrfs_root *root,
>>>>                    struct cache_tree *extent_cache)
>>>>   {
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-21  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-20  4:57 [PATCH v2 00/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: avoid extents overwrite Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: release path in repair_extent_data_item() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: record returned errors after walk_down_tree_v2() Su Yue
2017-12-29 11:17   ` Nikolay Borisov
2018-01-02  1:44     ` Su Yue
2018-01-02  1:50     ` Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: assign @parent early in repair_extent_data_item() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: exclude extents of metadata blocks Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: introduce modify_block_groups_cache() Su Yue
2017-12-20  5:38   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: introduce force_cow_in_new_chunk() Su Yue
2017-12-20  5:41   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-20  8:21     ` Su Yue
2017-12-20  8:37       ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-21  6:51         ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-12-21  7:06           ` Su Yue
2017-12-21  7:09           ` Su Yue
2017-12-21  7:12             ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-26  8:17               ` Su Yue
2017-12-26 10:28                 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-27  1:11                   ` Su Yue
2018-01-09  7:44                     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: introduce try_avoid_extents_overwrite() Su Yue
2017-12-20  5:46   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: exclude extents if init-extent-tree in lowmem Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: start to remove parameters @trans " Su Yue
2017-12-20  5:51   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: remove parameter @trans of delete_extent_item() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: remove parameter @trans of repair_chunk_item() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: remove parameter @trans of repair_extent_item() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: remove parameter @trans of check_leaf_items() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: remove parameter @trans of repair_tree_back_ref() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: remove parameter @trans of check_btrfs_root() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: introduce repair_block_accounting() Su Yue
2017-12-20  4:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: end of removing parameters @trans in lowmem Su Yue
2017-12-20  5:59 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: avoid extents overwrite Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c70b76c8-61c8-999a-158f-667fa9c86b5f@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox