From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: self heal from SB fail
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 07:51:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed75e747-4387-49a3-e62a-67e100dd4ea6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208075705.23462-1-anand.jain@oracle.com>
On 2017-12-08 02:57, Anand Jain wrote:
> -EXPERIMENTAL-
> As of now when primary SB fails we won't self heal and would fail mount,
> this is an experimental patch which thinks why not go and read backup
> copy.
I like the concept, and actually think this should be default behavior
on a filesystem that's already mounted (we fix other errors, why not
SB's), but I don't think it should be default behavior at mount time for
the reasons Qu has outlined (picking up old BTRFS SB's after
reformatting is bad). However, I do think it's useful to be able to ask
for this behavior on mount, so that you don't need to fight with the
programs to get a filesystem to mount when the first SB is missing
(perhaps add a 'usebackupsb' option to mirror 'usebackuproot'?).
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 8 +++++++-
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 10 +++++++---
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 9b20c1f3563b..a791b8dfe8a8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3190,7 +3190,7 @@ struct buffer_head *btrfs_read_dev_super(struct block_device *bdev)
> * So, we need to add a special mount option to scan for
> * later supers, using BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX instead
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
> ret = btrfs_read_dev_one_super(bdev, i, &bh);
> if (ret)
> continue;
> @@ -4015,11 +4015,17 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +#if 0
> + /*
> + * Need a way to check for any copy of SB, as its not a
> + * strong check, just ignore this for now.
> + */
> if (btrfs_super_bytenr(sb) != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
> btrfs_err(fs_info, "super offset mismatch %llu != %u",
> btrfs_super_bytenr(sb), BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * Obvious sys_chunk_array corruptions, it must hold at least one key
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 9fa2539a8493..f368db94d62b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> {
> struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
> struct block_device *bdev;
> - struct page *page;
> + struct buffer_head *sb_bh;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
> u64 devid;
> u64 transid;
> @@ -1392,8 +1392,12 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> goto error;
> }
>
> - if (btrfs_read_disk_super(bdev, bytenr, &page, &disk_super))
> + sb_bh = btrfs_read_dev_super(bdev);
> + if (IS_ERR(sb_bh)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(sb_bh);
> goto error_bdev_put;
> + }
> + disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *) sb_bh->b_data;
>
> devid = btrfs_stack_device_id(&disk_super->dev_item);
> transid = btrfs_super_generation(disk_super);
> @@ -1413,7 +1417,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
> if (!ret && fs_devices_ret)
> (*fs_devices_ret)->total_devices = total_devices;
>
> - btrfs_release_disk_super(page);
> + brelse(sb_bh);
>
> error_bdev_put:
> blkdev_put(bdev, flags);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-08 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-08 7:57 [PATCH RFC] btrfs: self heal from SB fail Anand Jain
2017-12-08 8:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 10:39 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 11:01 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 11:48 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 12:41 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:52 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 12:40 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-12-08 8:40 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-08 10:33 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:12 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-08 13:02 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:51 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn [this message]
2017-12-08 12:59 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 13:05 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-08 13:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 14:02 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-09 1:48 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-11 13:49 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 23:40 ` Paul Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed75e747-4387-49a3-e62a-67e100dd4ea6@gmail.com \
--to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox