Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: self heal from SB fail
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 07:51:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed75e747-4387-49a3-e62a-67e100dd4ea6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208075705.23462-1-anand.jain@oracle.com>

On 2017-12-08 02:57, Anand Jain wrote:
> -EXPERIMENTAL-
> As of now when primary SB fails we won't self heal and would fail mount,
> this is an experimental patch which thinks why not go and read backup
> copy.
I like the concept, and actually think this should be default behavior 
on a filesystem that's already mounted (we fix other errors, why not 
SB's), but I don't think it should be default behavior at mount time for 
the reasons Qu has outlined (picking up old BTRFS SB's after 
reformatting is bad).  However, I do think it's useful to be able to ask 
for this behavior on mount, so that you don't need to fight with the 
programs to get a filesystem to mount when the first SB is missing 
(perhaps add a 'usebackupsb' option to mirror 'usebackuproot'?).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |  8 +++++++-
>   fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 10 +++++++---
>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 9b20c1f3563b..a791b8dfe8a8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3190,7 +3190,7 @@ struct buffer_head *btrfs_read_dev_super(struct block_device *bdev)
>   	 * So, we need to add a special mount option to scan for
>   	 * later supers, using BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX instead
>   	 */
> -	for (i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
>   		ret = btrfs_read_dev_one_super(bdev, i, &bh);
>   		if (ret)
>   			continue;
> @@ -4015,11 +4015,17 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>   		ret = -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
> +#if 0
> +	/*
> +	 * Need a way to check for any copy of SB, as its not a
> +	 * strong check, just ignore this for now.
> +	 */
>   	if (btrfs_super_bytenr(sb) != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
>   		btrfs_err(fs_info, "super offset mismatch %llu != %u",
>   			  btrfs_super_bytenr(sb), BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
>   		ret = -EINVAL;
>   	}
> +#endif
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Obvious sys_chunk_array corruptions, it must hold at least one key
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 9fa2539a8493..f368db94d62b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
>   {
>   	struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
>   	struct block_device *bdev;
> -	struct page *page;
> +	struct buffer_head *sb_bh;
>   	int ret = -EINVAL;
>   	u64 devid;
>   	u64 transid;
> @@ -1392,8 +1392,12 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
>   		goto error;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (btrfs_read_disk_super(bdev, bytenr, &page, &disk_super))
> +	sb_bh = btrfs_read_dev_super(bdev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(sb_bh)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(sb_bh);
>   		goto error_bdev_put;
> +	}
> +	disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *) sb_bh->b_data;
>   
>   	devid = btrfs_stack_device_id(&disk_super->dev_item);
>   	transid = btrfs_super_generation(disk_super);
> @@ -1413,7 +1417,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
>   	if (!ret && fs_devices_ret)
>   		(*fs_devices_ret)->total_devices = total_devices;
>   
> -	btrfs_release_disk_super(page);
> +	brelse(sb_bh);
>   
>   error_bdev_put:
>   	blkdev_put(bdev, flags);
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-08 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-08  7:57 [PATCH RFC] btrfs: self heal from SB fail Anand Jain
2017-12-08  8:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 10:39   ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 11:01     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 11:48       ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:02         ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 12:41           ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:52             ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 12:40   ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-12-08  8:40 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-08 10:33   ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:12     ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-08 13:02       ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:51 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn [this message]
2017-12-08 12:59   ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 13:05     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-08 13:09       ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 14:02   ` Anand Jain
2017-12-09  1:48     ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-11 13:49       ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 23:40   ` Paul Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed75e747-4387-49a3-e62a-67e100dd4ea6@gmail.com \
    --to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox