From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>,
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: self heal from SB fail
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 20:59:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc69a05e-d0af-e9c6-1827-a9eb5ed742e0@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed75e747-4387-49a3-e62a-67e100dd4ea6@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4305 bytes --]
On 2017年12月08日 20:51, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2017-12-08 02:57, Anand Jain wrote:
>> -EXPERIMENTAL-
>> As of now when primary SB fails we won't self heal and would fail mount,
>> this is an experimental patch which thinks why not go and read backup
>> copy.
> I like the concept, and actually think this should be default behavior
> on a filesystem that's already mounted (we fix other errors, why not
> SB's), but I don't think it should be default behavior at mount time for
> the reasons Qu has outlined (picking up old BTRFS SB's after
> reformatting is bad). However, I do think it's useful to be able to ask
> for this behavior on mount, so that you don't need to fight with the
> programs to get a filesystem to mount when the first SB is missing
> (perhaps add a 'usebackupsb' option to mirror 'usebackuproot'?).
Yeah, I also like the idea of 'usebackupsuper'/'usebackupsuper=n' mount
option than do it automatically.
Thanks,
Qu
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 8 +++++++-
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 10 +++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> index 9b20c1f3563b..a791b8dfe8a8 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> @@ -3190,7 +3190,7 @@ struct buffer_head *btrfs_read_dev_super(struct
>> block_device *bdev)
>> * So, we need to add a special mount option to scan for
>> * later supers, using BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX instead
>> */
>> - for (i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
>> ret = btrfs_read_dev_one_super(bdev, i, &bh);
>> if (ret)
>> continue;
>> @@ -4015,11 +4015,17 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct
>> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> }
>> +#if 0
>> + /*
>> + * Need a way to check for any copy of SB, as its not a
>> + * strong check, just ignore this for now.
>> + */
>> if (btrfs_super_bytenr(sb) != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
>> btrfs_err(fs_info, "super offset mismatch %llu != %u",
>> btrfs_super_bytenr(sb), BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> }
>> +#endif
>> /*
>> * Obvious sys_chunk_array corruptions, it must hold at least
>> one key
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> index 9fa2539a8493..f368db94d62b 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
>> fmode_t flags, void *holder,
>> {
>> struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
>> struct block_device *bdev;
>> - struct page *page;
>> + struct buffer_head *sb_bh;
>> int ret = -EINVAL;
>> u64 devid;
>> u64 transid;
>> @@ -1392,8 +1392,12 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
>> fmode_t flags, void *holder,
>> goto error;
>> }
>> - if (btrfs_read_disk_super(bdev, bytenr, &page, &disk_super))
>> + sb_bh = btrfs_read_dev_super(bdev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(sb_bh)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(sb_bh);
>> goto error_bdev_put;
>> + }
>> + disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *) sb_bh->b_data;
>> devid = btrfs_stack_device_id(&disk_super->dev_item);
>> transid = btrfs_super_generation(disk_super);
>> @@ -1413,7 +1417,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path,
>> fmode_t flags, void *holder,
>> if (!ret && fs_devices_ret)
>> (*fs_devices_ret)->total_devices = total_devices;
>> - btrfs_release_disk_super(page);
>> + brelse(sb_bh);
>> error_bdev_put:
>> blkdev_put(bdev, flags);
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-08 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-08 7:57 [PATCH RFC] btrfs: self heal from SB fail Anand Jain
2017-12-08 8:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 10:39 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 11:01 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 11:48 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 12:41 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:52 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 12:40 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2017-12-08 8:40 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-08 10:33 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:12 ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-08 13:02 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 12:51 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-08 12:59 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-12-08 13:05 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-12-08 13:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-08 14:02 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-09 1:48 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-12-11 13:49 ` Anand Jain
2017-12-08 23:40 ` Paul Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc69a05e-d0af-e9c6-1827-a9eb5ed742e0@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox