Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: remove need_full_stripe
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:52:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1930f26-6422-8f57-0d4a-7cc431dd1a7c@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230531041740.375963-7-hch@lst.de>



On 2023/5/31 12:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> need_full_stripe is just a somewhat complicated way to say
> "op != BTRFS_MAP_READ".  Just spell that explicit check out, which makes
> a lot of the code currently using the helper easier to understand.

In fact the old "need_full_stripe" can even be confusing, as
BTRFS_MAP_READ with mirror_num > 1 on RAID56 would still need all the
stripes.

So removing it completely is indeed better.

>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

Thanks,
Qu
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 29 ++++++++++++-----------------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 6141a9fe5a28a0..8137c04f31c9cd 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -6173,11 +6173,6 @@ static void handle_ops_on_dev_replace(enum btrfs_map_op op,
>   	bioc->replace_nr_stripes = nr_extra_stripes;
>   }
>
> -static bool need_full_stripe(enum btrfs_map_op op)
> -{
> -	return (op == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE || op == BTRFS_MAP_GET_READ_MIRRORS);
> -}
> -
>   static u64 btrfs_max_io_len(struct map_lookup *map, enum btrfs_map_op op,
>   			    u64 offset, u32 *stripe_nr, u64 *stripe_offset,
>   			    u64 *full_stripe_start)
> @@ -6290,21 +6285,21 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
>   	if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0) {
>   		stripe_index = stripe_nr % map->num_stripes;
>   		stripe_nr /= map->num_stripes;
> -		if (!need_full_stripe(op))
> +		if (op == BTRFS_MAP_READ)
>   			mirror_num = 1;
>   	} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1_MASK) {
> -		if (need_full_stripe(op))
> +		if (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ) {
>   			num_stripes = map->num_stripes;
> -		else if (mirror_num)
> +		} else if (mirror_num) {
>   			stripe_index = mirror_num - 1;
> -		else {
> +		} else {
>   			stripe_index = find_live_mirror(fs_info, map, 0,
>   					    dev_replace_is_ongoing);
>   			mirror_num = stripe_index + 1;
>   		}
>
>   	} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP) {
> -		if (need_full_stripe(op)) {
> +		if (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ) {
>   			num_stripes = map->num_stripes;
>   		} else if (mirror_num) {
>   			stripe_index = mirror_num - 1;
> @@ -6318,7 +6313,7 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
>   		stripe_index = (stripe_nr % factor) * map->sub_stripes;
>   		stripe_nr /= factor;
>
> -		if (need_full_stripe(op))
> +		if (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ)
>   			num_stripes = map->sub_stripes;
>   		else if (mirror_num)
>   			stripe_index += mirror_num - 1;
> @@ -6331,7 +6326,7 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
>   		}
>
>   	} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) {
> -		if (need_raid_map && (need_full_stripe(op) || mirror_num > 1)) {
> +		if (need_raid_map && (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ || mirror_num > 1)) {
>   			/*
>   			 * Push stripe_nr back to the start of the full stripe
>   			 * For those cases needing a full stripe, @stripe_nr
> @@ -6366,7 +6361,7 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
>
>   			/* We distribute the parity blocks across stripes */
>   			stripe_index = (stripe_nr + stripe_index) % map->num_stripes;
> -			if (!need_full_stripe(op) && mirror_num <= 1)
> +			if (op == BTRFS_MAP_READ && mirror_num <= 1)
>   				mirror_num = 1;
>   		}
>   	} else {
> @@ -6406,7 +6401,7 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
>   	 */
>   	if (smap && num_alloc_stripes == 1 &&
>   	    !((map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) && mirror_num > 1) &&
> -	    (!need_full_stripe(op) || !dev_replace_is_ongoing ||
> +	    (op == BTRFS_MAP_READ || !dev_replace_is_ongoing ||
>   	     !dev_replace->tgtdev)) {
>   		set_io_stripe(smap, map, stripe_index, stripe_offset, stripe_nr);
>   		*mirror_num_ret = mirror_num;
> @@ -6430,7 +6425,7 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
>   	 * It's still mostly the same as other profiles, just with extra rotation.
>   	 */
>   	if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK && need_raid_map &&
> -	    (need_full_stripe(op) || mirror_num > 1)) {
> +	    (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ || mirror_num > 1)) {
>   		/*
>   		 * For RAID56 @stripe_nr is already the number of full stripes
>   		 * before us, which is also the rotation value (needs to modulo
> @@ -6457,11 +6452,11 @@ int btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,
>   		}
>   	}
>
> -	if (need_full_stripe(op))
> +	if (op != BTRFS_MAP_READ)
>   		max_errors = btrfs_chunk_max_errors(map);
>
>   	if (dev_replace_is_ongoing && dev_replace->tgtdev != NULL &&
> -	    need_full_stripe(op)) {
> +	    op != BTRFS_MAP_READ) {
>   		handle_ops_on_dev_replace(op, bioc, dev_replace, logical,
>   					  &num_stripes, &max_errors);
>   	}

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-31  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-31  4:17 cleanup the btrfs_map_block interface Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  4:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: remove BTRFS_MAP_DISCARD Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  8:45   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-05-31  4:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: optimize simple reads in btrfsic_map_block Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  8:47   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-05-31 12:31     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-05-31 12:35       ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31 12:46         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-05-31  4:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: remove btrfs_map_block Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  8:48   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-05-31  4:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: rename __btrfs_map_block to btrfs_map_block Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  8:48   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-05-31  4:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: remove btrfs_map_sblock Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  8:49   ` Qu Wenruo
2023-05-31  4:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: remove need_full_stripe Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31  8:52   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2023-05-31 12:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-05-31 12:35 ` cleanup the btrfs_map_block interface Johannes Thumshirn
2023-05-31 23:38 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f1930f26-6422-8f57-0d4a-7cc431dd1a7c@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox