From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:15:24 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2015.06.04.11.15.24@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1433342874-7099-2-git-send-email-jeffm@suse.com
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:47:52 -0400, jeffm wrote:
> This patch iterates over the unused chunk space and discards any regions
> that are unallocated, regardless of whether they were ever used. This is
> a change for btrfs but is consistent with other file systems.
> ..
[snip]
This just gave me:
fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'btrfs_shrink_device':
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4148:31: warning: passing argument 1 of 'contains_pending_extent' from incompatible pointer type
if (contains_pending_extent(trans, device, &start, len)) {
^
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1092:12: note: expected 'struct btrfs_transaction *' but argument is of type 'struct btrfs_trans_handle *'
static int contains_pending_extent(struct btrfs_transaction *transaction,
^
because it changes the signature of contains_pending_extent():
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 174f5e1..7fdde31 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1051,15 +1051,18 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int contains_pending_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> +static int contains_pending_extent(struct btrfs_transaction *transaction,
> struct btrfs_device *device,
> u64 *start, u64 len)
which conflicts with Filipe's patch on Tuesday called "Btrfs: check pending chunks
when shrinking fs to avoid corruption":
+ if (contains_pending_extent(trans, device, &start, len)) {
since trans (returned from start_transaction()) is a handle, not the tx itself.
ISTM that it should now pass trans->transaction instead..or something.
-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 14:47 [PATCH v3] btrfs: fix automatic blockgroup remove + discard jeffm
2015-06-03 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM jeffm
2015-06-04 11:15 ` Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2015-06-05 13:08 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-06-05 14:38 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2015-06-03 14:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: explictly delete unused block groups in close_ctree and ro-remount jeffm
2015-06-03 14:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: add missing discards when unpinning extents with -o discard jeffm
2015-06-08 14:12 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-06-09 20:48 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-06-10 0:05 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-06-10 22:52 ` Jeff Mahoney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2015.06.04.11.15.24@googlemail.com \
--to=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox