From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 03/11] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 18:18:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709181806.DB2911F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709-bcm_fixes-v11-3-067ba11bec5c@hartkopp.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] TX path directly overwrites active CAN frames via `memcpy_from_msg()` without a staging buffer or write-side lock, rendering the read-side lock useless and allowing torn frames or arbitrary `can_id` injection.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v11 03/11] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values ---
commit e17f7ae3aed2616decbe79bc147ce9802da8e284
Author: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values
This commit adds locking to protect timer and filter data updates in
bcm_rx_setup() against concurrent execution of RX handlers. It also adds a
lock-protected snapshot of the currframe in bcm_can_tx() to avoid partial
overwrites by content updates in bcm_tx_setup().
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/6975d5cf.a00a0220.33ccc7.0022.GAE@google.com/
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index b612135b017d1..af4bb4182bc29 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -293,22 +294,26 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> * bcm_can_tx - send the (next) CAN frame to the appropriate CAN interface
> * of the given bcm tx op
> */
> -static void bcm_can_tx(struct bcm_op *op)
> +static void bcm_can_tx(struct bcm_op *op, struct canfd_frame *cf)
> {
[ ... ]
> - /* read currframe under lock protection */
> - spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
> - cf = op->frames + op->cfsiz * op->currframe;
> - spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
> + if (!cf) {
> + /* read currframe under lock protection */
> + spin_lock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
> + memcpy(&cframe, op->frames + op->cfsiz * op->currframe,
> + op->cfsiz);
> + cf = &cframe;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&op->bcm_tx_lock);
> + }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this read-side snapshot actually
provide protection against partial overwrites from bcm_tx_setup()?
When updating an existing TX operation, bcm_tx_setup() directly overwrites
op->frames using the sleepable memcpy_from_msg() without holding
bcm_tx_lock or using a staging buffer:
net/can/bcm.c:bcm_tx_setup() {
...
err = memcpy_from_msg((u8 *)cf, msg, op->cfsiz);
...
if (msg_head->flags & TX_CP_CAN_ID) {
/* copy can_id into frame */
cf->can_id = msg_head->can_id;
}
...
}
Because the write-side completely ignores the lock, could a concurrent
timer still transmit torn CAN frames?
If TX_CP_CAN_ID is used, could the frame be transmitted after the user
payload is copied but before the enforced can_id is applied, allowing
unprivileged users to bypass ID enforcement and inject arbitrary CAN IDs?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709-bcm_fixes-v11-0-067ba11bec5c@hartkopp.net?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 17:56 [PATCH v11 00/11] can: bcm: collected fixes - final6 \o/ Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 01/11] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 02/11] can: bcm: fix lockless bound/ifindex race and silent RX_SETUP failure Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 03/11] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 05/11] can: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 06/11] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 07/11] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 08/11] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 09/11] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 11/11] can: bcm: track a single source interface for ANYDEV timeout/throttle ops Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709181806.DB2911F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox