From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, "Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 18:23:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709182354.328351F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709-bcm_fixes-v11-4-067ba11bec5c@hartkopp.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] `frames_filtered` can exceed `frames_abs` when a throttle timer flushes multiple multiplex frames across a `frames_abs` reset, causing negative reduction percentages.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v11 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics ---
commit 6e9ade605885c93bf1fc795169b773f4a95e422c
Author: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics
This commit fixes a KCSAN data race complaint in bcm_rx_handler() by
converting frames_abs and frames_filtered to atomic operations. It also
moves overflow updates into separate functions and aims to prevent
negative procfs reduction percentages.
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index af4bb4182bc29..38c3f690c1cd0 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -290,6 +294,24 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
>
> +static void bcm_update_rx_stats(struct bcm_op *op)
> +{
> + /* prevent overflow of the reduction% calculation in bcm_proc_show() */
> + if (atomic_long_inc_return(&op->frames_abs) > LONG_MAX / 100) {
> + atomic_long_set(&op->frames_filtered, 0);
> + atomic_long_set(&op->frames_abs, 0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void bcm_update_tx_stats(struct bcm_op *op)
> +{
[ ... ]
> @@ -497,12 +519,9 @@ static void bcm_rx_changed(struct bcm_op *op, struct canfd_frame *data)
> {
> struct bcm_msg_head head;
>
> - /* update statistics */
> - op->frames_filtered++;
> -
> - /* prevent statistics overflow */
> - if (op->frames_filtered > ULONG_MAX/100)
> - op->frames_filtered = op->frames_abs = 0;
> + /* update statistics (frames_filtered <= frames_abs) */
> + if (atomic_long_read(&op->frames_abs))
> + atomic_long_inc(&op->frames_filtered);
[Severity: Medium]
Could frames_filtered still exceed frames_abs here if a throttle timer flushes
multiple multiplex frames right after a counter reset?
If frames_abs reaches the LONG_MAX / 100 limit, bcm_update_rx_stats() resets
both counters to 0. If a subsequent frame is received, frames_abs is
incremented to 1.
If an active throttle timer then expires, bcm_rx_thr_flush() iterates and
calls bcm_rx_changed() for previously throttled frames:
net/can/bcm.c:bcm_rx_thr_flush() {
...
/* for MUX filter we start at index 1 */
for (i = 1; i < op->nframes; i++)
updated += bcm_rx_do_flush(op, i);
...
}
Since frames_abs is non-zero (1), the check in bcm_rx_changed() evaluates to
true, and it will increment frames_filtered for each flushed frame.
Because bcm_rx_thr_flush() can process multiple frames at once,
frames_filtered could quickly become larger than frames_abs, which seems to
result in the negative procfs reduction percentages this patch intended to
prevent.
> /* this element is not throttled anymore */
> data->flags &= ~RX_THR;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709-bcm_fixes-v11-0-067ba11bec5c@hartkopp.net?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 17:56 [PATCH v11 00/11] can: bcm: collected fixes - final6 \o/ Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 01/11] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 02/11] can: bcm: fix lockless bound/ifindex race and silent RX_SETUP failure Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 03/11] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 05/11] can: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 06/11] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 07/11] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 08/11] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 09/11] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 11/11] can: bcm: track a single source interface for ANYDEV timeout/throttle ops Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 18:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709182354.328351F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox