* [PATCH can-next v3] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output
@ 2026-10-16 10:37 Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-16 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-16 11:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2026-10-16 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-can; +Cc: Oliver Hartkopp, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
The proc content in /proc/net/can/ and /proc/net/can-bcm/ is intended to
check the internal filter lists (af_can, can_raw) and the efficiency and
functionality of can_bcm jobs. While exposing kernel addresses was
acceptable when this code was written the times have changed and multiple
attempts have been made to hash or remove such now sensitive data.
This patch removes the disclosure of pointers and instead provides the
function names and sock inode numbers when available. When the function
name can not be resolved (e.g. KALLSYMS=n or stripped module symbols)
%ps would fall back to the raw text address. Therefore (unknown) is
printed instead in this case. As there's no known tooling around the CAN
specific proc output breaking the ABI with this rework creates no issue.
Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
---
Documentation/networking/can.rst | 16 ++++++++++------
include/linux/can/core.h | 2 +-
net/can/af_can.c | 6 +++---
net/can/af_can.h | 2 +-
net/can/bcm.c | 14 +++++++-------
net/can/gw.c | 2 +-
net/can/isotp.c | 4 ++--
net/can/j1939/main.c | 2 +-
net/can/proc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
net/can/raw.c | 4 ++--
10 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/can.rst b/Documentation/networking/can.rst
index 536ff411da1d..51bc70748f75 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/can.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/can.rst
@@ -1038,21 +1038,25 @@ procfs content
As described in :ref:`socketcan-receive-lists` the SocketCAN core uses several filter
lists to deliver received CAN frames to CAN protocol modules. These
receive lists, their filters and the count of filter matches can be
checked in the appropriate receive list. All entries contain the
-device and a protocol module identifier::
+CAN network device, the filter (can_id/can_mask), the number of filter
+matches, the inode number of the subscribing socket and the name of the
+receive function. A sock_inode of 0 denotes a kernel internal subscriber
+without a socket (e.g. CAN gateway or J1939). When the function name can
+not be resolved (e.g. with CONFIG_KALLSYMS=n) "(unknown)" is printed::
foo@bar:~$ cat /proc/net/can/rcvlist_all
receive list 'rx_all':
- (vcan3: no entry)
- (vcan2: no entry)
- (vcan1: no entry)
- device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident
- vcan0 000 00000000 f88e6370 f6c6f400 0 raw
(any: no entry)
+ device can_id can_mask matches sock_inode function
+ vcan0 000 00000000 0 63586 raw_rcv [can_raw]
+ (vcan1: no entry)
+ (vcan2: no entry)
+ (vcan3: no entry)
In this example an application requests any CAN traffic from vcan0::
rcvlist_all - list for unfiltered entries (no filter operations)
rcvlist_eff - list for single extended frame (EFF) entries
diff --git a/include/linux/can/core.h b/include/linux/can/core.h
index 2de74c2b78b6..effb5c31ef40 100644
--- a/include/linux/can/core.h
+++ b/include/linux/can/core.h
@@ -49,11 +49,11 @@ extern int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp);
extern void can_proto_unregister(const struct can_proto *cp);
int can_rx_register(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *),
- void *data, char *ident, struct sock *sk);
+ void *data, u64 ino, struct sock *sk);
extern void can_rx_unregister(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *),
void *data);
diff --git a/net/can/af_can.c b/net/can/af_can.c
index dc27ace43719..d97f85fc3232 100644
--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -416,11 +416,11 @@ static struct hlist_head *can_rcv_list_find(canid_t *can_id, canid_t *mask,
* @dev: pointer to netdevice (NULL => subscribe from 'all' CAN devices list)
* @can_id: CAN identifier (see description)
* @mask: CAN mask (see description)
* @func: callback function on filter match
* @data: returned parameter for callback function
- * @ident: string for calling module identification
+ * @ino: inode number of sock (0 = unknown)
* @sk: socket pointer (might be NULL)
*
* Description:
* Invokes the callback function with the received sk_buff and the given
* parameter 'data' on a matching receive filter. A filter matches, when
@@ -441,11 +441,11 @@ static struct hlist_head *can_rcv_list_find(canid_t *can_id, canid_t *mask,
* -ENOMEM on missing cache mem to create subscription entry
* -ENODEV unknown device
*/
int can_rx_register(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id,
canid_t mask, void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *),
- void *data, char *ident, struct sock *sk)
+ void *data, u64 ino, struct sock *sk)
{
struct receiver *rcv;
struct hlist_head *rcv_list;
struct can_dev_rcv_lists *dev_rcv_lists;
struct can_rcv_lists_stats *rcv_lists_stats = net->can.rcv_lists_stats;
@@ -470,11 +470,11 @@ int can_rx_register(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id,
rcv->can_id = can_id;
rcv->mask = mask;
atomic_long_set(&rcv->matches, 0);
rcv->func = func;
rcv->data = data;
- rcv->ident = ident;
+ rcv->ino = ino;
rcv->sk = sk;
hlist_add_head_rcu(&rcv->list, rcv_list);
dev_rcv_lists->entries++;
diff --git a/net/can/af_can.h b/net/can/af_can.h
index 87887014f562..6e593ed5db5f 100644
--- a/net/can/af_can.h
+++ b/net/can/af_can.h
@@ -53,11 +53,11 @@ struct receiver {
canid_t can_id;
canid_t mask;
atomic_long_t matches;
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data);
void *data;
- char *ident;
+ u64 ino;
struct sock *sk;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
/* statistic structures */
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index 60406439a13f..6759662e024c 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -219,13 +219,11 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
struct net *net = m->private;
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)pde_data(m->file->f_inode);
struct bcm_sock *bo = bcm_sk(sk);
struct bcm_op *op;
- seq_printf(m, ">>> socket %pK", sk->sk_socket);
- seq_printf(m, " / sk %pK", sk);
- seq_printf(m, " / bo %pK", bo);
+ seq_printf(m, ">>> sock inode %s", bo->procname);
seq_printf(m, " / dropped %lu", bo->dropped_usr_msgs);
seq_printf(m, " / bound %s", bcm_proc_getifname(net, ifname, bo->ifindex));
seq_printf(m, " <<<\n");
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -1535,11 +1533,11 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
if (dev) {
err = can_rx_register(sock_net(sk), dev,
op->can_id,
REGMASK(op->can_id),
bcm_rx_handler, op,
- "bcm", sk);
+ sock_i_ino(sk), sk);
/* keep a tracked reference so that a later
* unregister can safely reach the device even
* if a concurrent NETDEV_UNREGISTER has
* already unlisted it by ifindex
@@ -1559,11 +1557,12 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
}
} else {
err = can_rx_register(sock_net(sk), NULL, op->can_id,
REGMASK(op->can_id),
- bcm_rx_handler, op, "bcm", sk);
+ bcm_rx_handler, op,
+ sock_i_ino(sk), sk);
}
if (err) {
/* newly created bcm rx op is broken -> remove it */
if (new_op) {
@@ -2039,12 +2038,13 @@ static int bcm_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, int
bo->ifindex = 0;
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS)
if (net->can.bcmproc_dir) {
- /* unique socket address as filename */
- sprintf(bo->procname, "%llu", sock_i_ino(sk));
+ /* use unique socket inode number as filename */
+ snprintf(bo->procname, sizeof(bo->procname),
+ "%llu", sock_i_ino(sk));
bo->bcm_proc_read = proc_create_net_single(bo->procname, 0644,
net->can.bcmproc_dir,
bcm_proc_show, sk);
if (!bo->bcm_proc_read) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/net/can/gw.c b/net/can/gw.c
index 54bb5bd3242a..8a5327d8a00e 100644
--- a/net/can/gw.c
+++ b/net/can/gw.c
@@ -578,11 +578,11 @@ static void can_can_gw_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
static inline int cgw_register_filter(struct net *net, struct cgw_job *gwj)
{
return can_rx_register(net, gwj->src.dev, gwj->ccgw.filter.can_id,
gwj->ccgw.filter.can_mask, can_can_gw_rcv,
- gwj, "gw", NULL);
+ gwj, 0, NULL);
}
static inline void cgw_unregister_filter(struct net *net, struct cgw_job *gwj)
{
can_rx_unregister(net, gwj->src.dev, gwj->ccgw.filter.can_id,
diff --git a/net/can/isotp.c b/net/can/isotp.c
index 6c28802c0605..1a272ce6a2bd 100644
--- a/net/can/isotp.c
+++ b/net/can/isotp.c
@@ -1624,18 +1624,18 @@ static int isotp_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, int l
ifindex = dev->ifindex;
if (isotp_register_rxid(so))
can_rx_register(net, dev, rx_id, SINGLE_MASK(rx_id),
- isotp_rcv, sk, "isotp", sk);
+ isotp_rcv, sk, sock_i_ino(sk), sk);
/* no consecutive frame echo skb in flight */
WRITE_ONCE(so->cfecho, 0);
/* register for echo skb's */
can_rx_register(net, dev, tx_id, SINGLE_MASK(tx_id),
- isotp_rcv_echo, sk, "isotpe", sk);
+ isotp_rcv_echo, sk, sock_i_ino(sk), sk);
/* switch to new settings */
so->ifindex = ifindex;
so->rxid = rx_id;
so->txid = tx_id;
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/main.c b/net/can/j1939/main.c
index 5e5e6c228f22..d9384cf0e356 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/main.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@ static int j1939_can_rx_register(struct j1939_priv *priv)
struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
int ret;
j1939_priv_get(priv);
ret = can_rx_register(dev_net(ndev), ndev, J1939_CAN_ID, J1939_CAN_MASK,
- j1939_can_recv, priv, "j1939", NULL);
+ j1939_can_recv, priv, 0, NULL);
if (ret < 0) {
j1939_priv_put(priv);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/net/can/proc.c b/net/can/proc.c
index de4d05ae3459..ba330dd8731d 100644
--- a/net/can/proc.c
+++ b/net/can/proc.c
@@ -189,30 +189,36 @@ static void can_print_rcvlist(struct seq_file *m, struct hlist_head *rx_list,
struct net_device *dev)
{
struct receiver *r;
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(r, rx_list, list) {
+ char symcheck[4];
char *fmt = (r->can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG)?
- " %-5s %08x %08x %pK %pK %8ld %s\n" :
- " %-5s %03x %08x %pK %pK %8ld %s\n";
+ " %6s %08x %08x %8ld %10llu" :
+ " %6s %03x %08x %8ld %10llu";
seq_printf(m, fmt, DNAME(dev), r->can_id, r->mask,
- r->func, r->data, atomic_long_read(&r->matches),
- r->ident);
+ atomic_long_read(&r->matches), r->ino);
+
+ /* %ps falls back to the raw text address when the symbol
+ * can not be resolved (KALLSYMS=n, stripped module symbols)
+ */
+ snprintf(symcheck, sizeof(symcheck), "%ps", r->func);
+ if (strncmp(symcheck, "0x", 2))
+ seq_printf(m, " %ps\n", r->func);
+ else
+ seq_puts(m, " (unknown)\n");
}
}
static void can_print_recv_banner(struct seq_file *m)
{
/*
- * can1. 00000000 00000000 00000000
- * ....... 0 tp20
+ * device can_id can_mask matches sock_inode function
+ * vcan0 000 00000000 0 43798 raw_rcv [can_raw]
*/
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT))
- seq_puts(m, " device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident\n");
- else
- seq_puts(m, " device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident\n");
+ seq_puts(m, " device can_id can_mask matches sock_inode function\n");
}
static int can_stats_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct net *net = m->private;
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
index e1d741a25be3..09a5c0275ae6 100644
--- a/net/can/raw.c
+++ b/net/can/raw.c
@@ -224,11 +224,11 @@ static int raw_enable_filters(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
int i;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
err = can_rx_register(net, dev, filter[i].can_id,
filter[i].can_mask,
- raw_rcv, sk, "raw", sk);
+ raw_rcv, sk, sock_i_ino(sk), sk);
if (err) {
/* clean up successfully registered filters */
while (--i >= 0)
can_rx_unregister(net, dev, filter[i].can_id,
filter[i].can_mask,
@@ -245,11 +245,11 @@ static int raw_enable_errfilter(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
{
int err = 0;
if (err_mask)
err = can_rx_register(net, dev, 0, err_mask | CAN_ERR_FLAG,
- raw_rcv, sk, "raw", sk);
+ raw_rcv, sk, sock_i_ino(sk), sk);
return err;
}
static void raw_disable_filters(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH can-next v3] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output
2026-10-16 10:37 [PATCH can-next v3] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output Oliver Hartkopp
@ 2026-10-16 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-16 11:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-16 11:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2026-10-16 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Hartkopp; +Cc: linux-can
On 2026-10-16 12:37:06 [+0200], Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> The proc content in /proc/net/can/ and /proc/net/can-bcm/ is intended to
> check the internal filter lists (af_can, can_raw) and the efficiency and
> functionality of can_bcm jobs. While exposing kernel addresses was
> acceptable when this code was written the times have changed and multiple
> attempts have been made to hash or remove such now sensitive data.
>
> This patch removes the disclosure of pointers and instead provides the
> function names and sock inode numbers when available. When the function
> name can not be resolved (e.g. KALLSYMS=n or stripped module symbols)
> %ps would fall back to the raw text address. Therefore (unknown) is
> printed instead in this case. As there's no known tooling around the CAN
> specific proc output breaking the ABI with this rework creates no issue.
>
> Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
I am all fine with this \o/
> --- a/net/can/proc.c
> +++ b/net/can/proc.c
> @@ -189,30 +189,36 @@ static void can_print_rcvlist(struct seq_file *m, struct hlist_head *rx_list,
> struct net_device *dev)
…
> +
> + /* %ps falls back to the raw text address when the symbol
> + * can not be resolved (KALLSYMS=n, stripped module symbols)
> + */
> + snprintf(symcheck, sizeof(symcheck), "%ps", r->func);
> + if (strncmp(symcheck, "0x", 2))
> + seq_printf(m, " %ps\n", r->func);
> + else
> + seq_puts(m, " (unknown)\n");
If you want to keep this because the bot said so, fine. I will let you
know once my side projects gets through
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261015-vsprintf_kallsym-v3-1-c175c27f38b7@linutronix.de/
;)
> }
> }
>
Sebastian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH can-next v3] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output
2026-10-16 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2026-10-16 11:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Hartkopp @ 2026-10-16 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior; +Cc: linux-can
On 16.10.26 12:43, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2026-10-16 12:37:06 [+0200], Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> The proc content in /proc/net/can/ and /proc/net/can-bcm/ is intended to
>> check the internal filter lists (af_can, can_raw) and the efficiency and
>> functionality of can_bcm jobs. While exposing kernel addresses was
>> acceptable when this code was written the times have changed and multiple
>> attempts have been made to hash or remove such now sensitive data.
>>
>> This patch removes the disclosure of pointers and instead provides the
>> function names and sock inode numbers when available. When the function
>> name can not be resolved (e.g. KALLSYMS=n or stripped module symbols)
>> %ps would fall back to the raw text address. Therefore (unknown) is
>> printed instead in this case. As there's no known tooling around the CAN
>> specific proc output breaking the ABI with this rework creates no issue.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
>
> I am all fine with this \o/
>
>> --- a/net/can/proc.c
>> +++ b/net/can/proc.c
>> @@ -189,30 +189,36 @@ static void can_print_rcvlist(struct seq_file *m, struct hlist_head *rx_list,
>> struct net_device *dev)
> …
>> +
>> + /* %ps falls back to the raw text address when the symbol
>> + * can not be resolved (KALLSYMS=n, stripped module symbols)
>> + */
>> + snprintf(symcheck, sizeof(symcheck), "%ps", r->func);
>> + if (strncmp(symcheck, "0x", 2))
>> + seq_printf(m, " %ps\n", r->func);
>> + else
>> + seq_puts(m, " (unknown)\n");
>
> If you want to keep this because the bot said so, fine. I will let you
> know once my side projects gets through
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261015-vsprintf_kallsym-v3-1-c175c27f38b7@linutronix.de/
>
> ;)
>
Yes, thanks!
"if (strncmp(symcheck, "0x", 2))" is definitely not my favorite
solution. So I would be happy to simplify the code again once your
hashed pointer solution is in mainline.
Best regards,
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH can-next v3] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output
2026-10-16 10:37 [PATCH can-next v3] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-16 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
@ 2026-10-16 11:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2026-10-16 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-can, Oliver Hartkopp; +Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 12:37:06 +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output
commit: 2e8d76f6b54b58d77c617483dfbbd816ac5da8e8
Best regards,
--
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-16 11:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-16 10:37 [PATCH can-next v3] can: proc: remove pointers from CAN specific proc output Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-16 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-16 11:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-10-16 11:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox