Re: [PATCH net-next 07/12] can: rcar_canfd: Use DT clock names in the probe message

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 12 Nov 2026 14:44:43 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > RZ/G3E, RZ/V2H, RZ/V2N have input clocks named in the HW manual as pclk,
> > clk_ram and canfd. These are described in [1] page 3365, [2] page 3286, [3]
> > page 3160.
> >
> > All these have external_clk = 0, fcan_pclk = 0 and the patch here will print
> > "canfd clk" for them, as it is actually defined in HW, and as the previous
> > code did.
> >
> > It is true the commit message mentions it uses DT binding clock names. Maybe
> > that should be amended.
> >
> > With the current binding names and various usage of it across different SoCs
> > I'm not sure we can use binding names for all the cases.
> >
> > Please let me know how would you like me to proceed.  
> 
> I think it's fine. Let's see what the netdev people say :)

Fine by us if it's fine by you :) Thanks for chasing down 
the explanation!