From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Jonas Mark (ST-FIR/ENG1)" <Mark.Jonas@de.bosch.com>,
Andri Yngvason <andri.yngvason@marel.com>,
"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "hs@denx.de" <hs@denx.de>,
"RUAN Tingquan (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)" <Tingquan.Ruan@cn.bosch.com>,
"ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)" <Yi.Zhu5@cn.bosch.com>
Subject: Re: flexcan missing error state transitions
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 12:57:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ec91a72-49b2-ca43-9472-8f079b278c80@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71679863-5b47-faf2-ca44-27eb1abf16c6@pengutronix.de>
Am 22.08.2017 um 16:06 schrieb Marc Kleine-Budde:
> On 08/22/2017 03:50 PM, Jonas Mark (ST-FIR/ENG1) wrote:
>> Hello Andri,
>>
>>>> Which polling interval do you think would be appropriate? It
>>>> somehow has to be
>>> a reasonable trade-off between latency and CPU usage. That's a good
>>> question. I don't think that there is a really good answer to it.
>>> It would be nice to see intermittent state-transitions happening,
>>> so I would say as fast as possible without affecting CPU usage to a
>>> significant degree. The polling timer should not be a high
>>> resolution timer or anything that would preempt an rt task.
>>>
>>> This value could also depend on the bitrate as that will affect the
>>> rate at which the error-counter can change. E.g. on 125 k rate, you
>>> will receive at most one frame per 1 ms. This means that the error
>>> state will change at at least 64 ms intervals, so we would have to
>>> sample at 32 ms intervals to catch all the transitions. For 1 M
>>> this would be around 2 ms.
>>>
>>> Note that this is all somewhat speculative as I do not know exactly
>>> how fast the error counters are incremented/decremented.
>>
>> We agree that there is a sensible lower boundary for the polling
>> interval which depends on the bitrate. And there is a upper boundary
>> which depends on the application.
>>
>> We are currently thinking about whether it would be possible to do
>> the polling only in case the controller is actually experiencing
>> trouble.
>
> Why not enable bus errors on broken controllers. Disable once a bus
Yes, that's what we have done in the past for Flexcan controller cores
that do not have dedicated interrupt lines for state changes. We have
introduced FLEXCAN_QUIRK_BROKEN_ERR_STATE for that purpose. It should
work already with the current driver. Yi ZHU, have you tried that?
> error hits and re-enable them after a configurable timeout with a proper
> default. I have a patch somewhere, although it applies only against the
> pre rx-offload version of the driver.
And that would help to avoid the interrupt flooding problem.
Wolfgang.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-27 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 7:47 flexcan missing error state transitions ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-21 16:18 ` Andri Yngvason
2017-08-21 17:13 ` AW: " Jonas Mark (ST-FIR/ENG1)
2017-08-21 18:21 ` Andri Yngvason
2017-08-22 13:50 ` AW: " Jonas Mark (ST-FIR/ENG1)
2017-08-22 14:06 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2017-08-22 19:03 ` AW: " Jonas Mark (ST-FIR/ENG1)
2017-08-24 9:40 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-25 17:16 ` Andri Yngvason
2017-08-27 10:57 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2017-08-28 4:21 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-28 8:33 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2017-08-29 8:49 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-29 9:38 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2017-08-30 1:39 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-29 11:17 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2017-08-30 4:22 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-30 6:25 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2017-08-30 6:50 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-30 7:15 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2017-08-30 9:05 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-30 10:59 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2017-08-31 8:33 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-31 9:53 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2017-09-01 8:24 ` ZHU Yi (ST-FIR/ENG1-Zhu)
2017-08-29 13:41 ` Andri Yngvason
2017-08-22 14:14 ` AW: AW: " Andri Yngvason
2017-08-27 12:55 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-26 5:46 朱燚
2017-08-28 11:23 ` Andri Yngvason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ec91a72-49b2-ca43-9472-8f079b278c80@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=Mark.Jonas@de.bosch.com \
--cc=Tingquan.Ruan@cn.bosch.com \
--cc=Yi.Zhu5@cn.bosch.com \
--cc=andri.yngvason@marel.com \
--cc=hs@denx.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox