* [PATCH] can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed
@ 2026-08-20 16:28 Tetsuo Handa
2026-08-20 16:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 8:24 ` Oleksij Rempel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2026-08-20 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robin van der Gracht, Oleksij Rempel, kernel, Oliver Hartkopp,
Marc Kleine-Budde, linux-can
syzbot is reporting "struct j1939_ecu" refcount leak, which occurs when
netdev_hold() is called during ECU creation but the corresponding
netdev_put() is never executed because the parent "struct j1939_ecu"
object is leaked.
unregister_netdevice: waiting for vxcan1 to become free. Usage count = 3
ref_tracker: netdev@ffff8880710f0700 has 1/2 users at
__netdev_tracker_alloc include/linux/netdevice.h:4496 [inline]
netdev_hold include/linux/netdevice.h:4525 [inline]
j1939_ecu_create_locked+0x1c9/0x400 net/can/j1939/bus.c:159
j1939_local_ecu_get+0xeb/0x220 net/can/j1939/bus.c:293
j1939_sk_bind+0x70a/0xc60 net/can/j1939/socket.c:529
__sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1920 [inline]
__sys_bind+0x2e3/0x410 net/socket.c:1951
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1956 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1954 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1954
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
ref_tracker: netdev@ffff8880710f0700 has 1/2 users at
__netdev_tracker_alloc include/linux/netdevice.h:4496 [inline]
netdev_hold include/linux/netdevice.h:4525 [inline]
j1939_priv_create net/can/j1939/main.c:140 [inline]
j1939_netdev_start+0x387/0xb20 net/can/j1939/main.c:268
j1939_sk_bind+0x946/0xc60 net/can/j1939/socket.c:506
__sys_bind_socket net/socket.c:1920 [inline]
__sys_bind+0x2e3/0x410 net/socket.c:1951
__do_sys_bind net/socket.c:1956 [inline]
__se_sys_bind net/socket.c:1954 [inline]
__x64_sys_bind+0x7a/0x90 net/socket.c:1954
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
The root cause lies in the error handling of j1939_sk_bind() during a
re-bind operation (binding an already bound socket to the same interface).
Currently, the function prematurely drops the old ECU references by calling
j1939_local_ecu_put() before verifying whether the new configuration can be
successfully acquired via j1939_local_ecu_get().
If j1939_local_ecu_get() subsequently fails, the function unconditionally
calls j1939_netdev_stop() and clears jsk->priv. This leaves the socket in a
half-broken state where the old ECU's refcount has already been decremented
incompletely, but the socket destruct pathway (j1939_sk_sock_destruct) can
no longer perform proper cleanup because jsk->priv is NULL. As a result,
the old "struct j1939_ecu" remains orphaned on the priv->ecus list,
permanently leaking both the ECU object and the net_device reference held
inside it.
Fix this by deferring the removal and release of the old ECU references
until after j1939_local_ecu_get() has successfully acquired the new
resources. As a side effect of this change, the socket's state no longer
changes when the re-bind operation failed.
Reported-by: syzbot+e2af46126e0644cbebdd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e2af46126e0644cbebdd
Analyzed-by: AI Mode in Google Search (no mail address)
Fixes: f214744c8a27 ("can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): call j1939_priv_put() immediately when j1939_local_ecu_get() failed")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
net/can/j1939/socket.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/socket.c b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
index 50a598ef5fd4..24efb25c58c3 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/socket.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
@@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ static int j1939_sk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, in
struct sock *sk;
struct net *net;
int ret = 0;
+ bool was_bound;
ret = j1939_sk_sanity_check(addr, len);
if (ret)
@@ -462,7 +463,8 @@ static int j1939_sk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, in
net = sock_net(sk);
/* Already bound to an interface? */
- if (jsk->state & J1939_SOCK_BOUND) {
+ was_bound = (jsk->state & J1939_SOCK_BOUND);
+ if (was_bound) {
/* A re-bind() to a different interface is not
* supported.
*/
@@ -470,10 +472,6 @@ static int j1939_sk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, in
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out_release_sock;
}
-
- /* drop old references */
- j1939_jsk_del(priv, jsk);
- j1939_local_ecu_put(priv, jsk->addr.src_name, jsk->addr.sa);
} else {
struct can_ml_priv *can_ml;
struct net_device *ndev;
@@ -519,22 +517,31 @@ static int j1939_sk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, in
jsk->priv = priv;
}
+ /* get new references without dropping old references */
+ ret = j1939_local_ecu_get(priv, addr->can_addr.j1939.name, addr->can_addr.j1939.addr);
+ if (ret) {
+ /* nothing to undo if re-bind() failed */
+ if (!was_bound) {
+ j1939_netdev_stop(priv);
+ jsk->priv = NULL;
+ synchronize_rcu();
+ j1939_priv_put(priv);
+ }
+ goto out_release_sock;
+ }
+
+ /* drop old references after re-bind() succeeded */
+ if (was_bound) {
+ j1939_jsk_del(priv, jsk);
+ j1939_local_ecu_put(priv, jsk->addr.src_name, jsk->addr.sa);
+ }
+
/* set default transmit pgn */
if (j1939_pgn_is_valid(addr->can_addr.j1939.pgn))
jsk->pgn_rx_filter = addr->can_addr.j1939.pgn;
jsk->addr.src_name = addr->can_addr.j1939.name;
jsk->addr.sa = addr->can_addr.j1939.addr;
- /* get new references */
- ret = j1939_local_ecu_get(priv, jsk->addr.src_name, jsk->addr.sa);
- if (ret) {
- j1939_netdev_stop(priv);
- jsk->priv = NULL;
- synchronize_rcu();
- j1939_priv_put(priv);
- goto out_release_sock;
- }
-
j1939_jsk_add(priv, jsk);
out_release_sock: /* fall through */
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed
2026-08-20 16:28 [PATCH] can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed Tetsuo Handa
@ 2026-08-20 16:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:16 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-08-21 8:24 ` Oleksij Rempel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-20 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Vincent Mailhol, linux-can, Oleksij Rempel, Oliver Hartkopp,
Marc Kleine-Budde
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Netdevice refcount leak due to a race condition where the unregister notifier misses a socket during bind or re-bind list manipulations.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed ---
commit 472bfe7c306ed38083d747b95430b318ca86c9cf
Author: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed
This commit fixes an ECU and net_device reference leak in j1939_sk_bind().
It defers removing the old ECU references during a re-bind operation until
after the new resources have been successfully acquired.
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e2af46126e0644cbebdd
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/socket.c b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
> index 50a598ef5fd4a..24efb25c58c3f 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/socket.c
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/socket.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -519,22 +517,31 @@ static int j1939_sk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uaddr, in
> jsk->priv = priv;
> }
>
> + /* get new references without dropping old references */
> + ret = j1939_local_ecu_get(priv, addr->can_addr.j1939.name, addr->can_addr.j1939.addr);
> + if (ret) {
> + /* nothing to undo if re-bind() failed */
> + if (!was_bound) {
> + j1939_netdev_stop(priv);
> + jsk->priv = NULL;
> + synchronize_rcu();
> + j1939_priv_put(priv);
> + }
> + goto out_release_sock;
> + }
> +
> + /* drop old references after re-bind() succeeded */
> + if (was_bound) {
> + j1939_jsk_del(priv, jsk);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this create a race
condition with netdevice unregistration during bind and re-bind?
When a socket takes a reference to priv during an initial bind (when
jsk->priv = priv is set), or during a re-bind when it is temporarily
removed from the list via j1939_jsk_del() right here, the socket is holding a
netdevice reference but is absent from the priv->j1939_socks list.
If j1939_sk_netdev_event_unregister() executes concurrently during this
window, it searches for sockets to clean up by iterating that exact list:
net/can/j1939/socket.c:j1939_sk_netdev_event_unregister() {
...
list_for_each_entry(jsk, &priv->j1939_socks, list) {
...
}
}
Could the unregister notifier miss the socket completely while it is
temporarily unlinked, skipping the mandatory cleanup and resulting in
unregister_netdevice() hanging indefinitely in netdev_wait_allrefs()?
> + j1939_local_ecu_put(priv, jsk->addr.src_name, jsk->addr.sa);
> + }
> +
> /* set default transmit pgn */
> if (j1939_pgn_is_valid(addr->can_addr.j1939.pgn))
> jsk->pgn_rx_filter = addr->can_addr.j1939.pgn;
> jsk->addr.src_name = addr->can_addr.j1939.name;
> jsk->addr.sa = addr->can_addr.j1939.addr;
>
> - /* get new references */
> - ret = j1939_local_ecu_get(priv, jsk->addr.src_name, jsk->addr.sa);
> - if (ret) {
> - j1939_netdev_stop(priv);
> - jsk->priv = NULL;
> - synchronize_rcu();
> - j1939_priv_put(priv);
> - goto out_release_sock;
> - }
> -
> j1939_jsk_add(priv, jsk);
>
> out_release_sock: /* fall through */
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/8063b5c1-6171-4350-a7d1-6ccd079fb0ff@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed
2026-08-20 16:28 [PATCH] can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed Tetsuo Handa
2026-08-20 16:40 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-08-21 8:24 ` Oleksij Rempel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleksij Rempel @ 2026-08-21 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: Robin van der Gracht, kernel, Oliver Hartkopp, Marc Kleine-Budde,
linux-can
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 01:28:13AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> syzbot is reporting "struct j1939_ecu" refcount leak, which occurs when
> netdev_hold() is called during ECU creation but the corresponding
> netdev_put() is never executed because the parent "struct j1939_ecu"
> object is leaked.
>
....
>
> The root cause lies in the error handling of j1939_sk_bind() during a
> re-bind operation (binding an already bound socket to the same interface).
> Currently, the function prematurely drops the old ECU references by calling
> j1939_local_ecu_put() before verifying whether the new configuration can be
> successfully acquired via j1939_local_ecu_get().
>
> If j1939_local_ecu_get() subsequently fails, the function unconditionally
> calls j1939_netdev_stop() and clears jsk->priv. This leaves the socket in a
> half-broken state where the old ECU's refcount has already been decremented
> incompletely, but the socket destruct pathway (j1939_sk_sock_destruct) can
> no longer perform proper cleanup because jsk->priv is NULL. As a result,
> the old "struct j1939_ecu" remains orphaned on the priv->ecus list,
> permanently leaking both the ECU object and the net_device reference held
> inside it.
>
> Fix this by deferring the removal and release of the old ECU references
> until after j1939_local_ecu_get() has successfully acquired the new
> resources. As a side effect of this change, the socket's state no longer
> changes when the re-bind operation failed.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+e2af46126e0644cbebdd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e2af46126e0644cbebdd
> Analyzed-by: AI Mode in Google Search (no mail address)
> Fixes: f214744c8a27 ("can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): call j1939_priv_put() immediately when j1939_local_ecu_get() failed")
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Thank you!
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed
2026-08-20 16:40 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-08-21 11:16 ` Tetsuo Handa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2026-08-21 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sashiko-reviews
Cc: Vincent Mailhol, linux-can, Oleksij Rempel, Oliver Hartkopp,
Marc Kleine-Budde
Hello, sashiko.
On 2026/08/21 1:40, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Netdevice refcount leak due to a race condition where the unregister notifier misses a socket during bind or re-bind list manipulations.
> --
Thanks for the comment. However, I consider this is a false positive and won't cause a permanent
hang. If j1939_netdev_stop() is temporarily skipped because a socket is missing from the list
during a re-bind window, priv->rx_kref remains non-zero. This prevents __j1939_rx_release() from
clearing the netdev mapping (j1939_priv_set(priv->ndev, NULL)). Since the netdev core repeatedly
retries NETDEV_UNREGISTER notifications as long as references exist, the next retry window will
successfully capture the returned socket on the list and execute j1939_netdev_stop() properly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-21 11:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-20 16:28 [PATCH] can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): fix j1939_ecu leak when re-bind failed Tetsuo Handa
2026-08-20 16:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 11:16 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-08-21 8:24 ` Oleksij Rempel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox