* [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev()
@ 2023-10-20 13:02 Kangjing "Chaser" Huang
2023-10-20 14:45 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kangjing "Chaser" Huang @ 2023-10-20 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs
Cc: linkinjeon, smfrench, senozhatsky, tom, atteh.mailbox,
huangkangjing
Physical ib_device does not have an underlying net_device, thus its
association with IPoIB net_device cannot be retrieved via
ops.get_netdev() or ib_device_get_by_netdev(). ksmbd reads physical
ib_device port GUID from the lower 16 bytes of the hardware addresses on
IPoIB net_device and match its underlying ib_device using ib_find_gid()
Signed-off-by: Kangjing Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
v2 -> v1:
* Add more detailed description to comment
---
fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
index 3b269e1f523a..a623e29b2760 100644
--- a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
+++ b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
@@ -2140,8 +2140,7 @@ static int smb_direct_ib_client_add(struct ib_device *ib_dev)
if (ib_dev->node_type != RDMA_NODE_IB_CA)
smb_direct_port = SMB_DIRECT_PORT_IWARP;
- if (!ib_dev->ops.get_netdev ||
- !rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
+ if (!rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
return 0;
smb_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*smb_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2241,17 +2240,37 @@ bool ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev(struct net_device *netdev)
for (i = 0; i < smb_dev->ib_dev->phys_port_cnt; i++) {
struct net_device *ndev;
- ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(smb_dev->ib_dev,
- i + 1);
- if (!ndev)
- continue;
+ if (smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev) {
+ ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(
+ smb_dev->ib_dev, i + 1);
+ if (!ndev)
+ continue;
- if (ndev == netdev) {
+ if (ndev == netdev) {
+ dev_put(ndev);
+ rdma_capable = true;
+ goto out;
+ }
dev_put(ndev);
- rdma_capable = true;
- goto out;
+ /* if ib_dev does not implement ops.get_netdev
+ * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
+ } else if (netdev->type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) {
+ struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
+ union ib_gid gid;
+ u32 port_num;
+ int ret;
+
+ netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(
+ ha, &netdev->dev_addrs) {
+ memcpy(&gid, ha->addr + 4, sizeof(gid));
+ ret = ib_find_gid(smb_dev->ib_dev, &gid,
+ &port_num, NULL);
+ if (!ret) {
+ rdma_capable = true;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
}
- dev_put(ndev);
}
}
out:
--
2.42.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev()
2023-10-20 13:02 [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev() Kangjing "Chaser" Huang
@ 2023-10-20 14:45 ` Namjae Jeon
2023-10-20 20:27 ` Tom Talpey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2023-10-20 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kangjing "Chaser" Huang
Cc: linux-cifs, smfrench, senozhatsky, tom, atteh.mailbox
2023-10-20 22:02 GMT+09:00, Kangjing "Chaser" Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>:
> Physical ib_device does not have an underlying net_device, thus its
> association with IPoIB net_device cannot be retrieved via
> ops.get_netdev() or ib_device_get_by_netdev(). ksmbd reads physical
> ib_device port GUID from the lower 16 bytes of the hardware addresses on
> IPoIB net_device and match its underlying ib_device using ib_find_gid()
>
> Signed-off-by: Kangjing Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Can you fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl ? You need to run it like
this. ./scripts/checkpatch.pl [patch]
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
#148: FILE: fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c:2256:
+ * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: "Kangjing
\Chaser\ Huang" <huangkangjing@gmail.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Kangjing
Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>'
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 54 lines checked
And have you made this patch on linux 6.6-rc6 kernel ? because I can't
apply this patch with the following error.
checking file fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2140.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2241.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED
Thanks.
>
> v2 -> v1:
> * Add more detailed description to comment
> ---
> fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
> b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
> index 3b269e1f523a..a623e29b2760 100644
> --- a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
> +++ b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
> @@ -2140,8 +2140,7 @@ static int smb_direct_ib_client_add(struct ib_device
> *ib_dev)
> if (ib_dev->node_type != RDMA_NODE_IB_CA)
> smb_direct_port = SMB_DIRECT_PORT_IWARP;
>
> - if (!ib_dev->ops.get_netdev ||
> - !rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
> + if (!rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
> return 0;
>
> smb_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*smb_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -2241,17 +2240,37 @@ bool ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev(struct net_device
> *netdev)
> for (i = 0; i < smb_dev->ib_dev->phys_port_cnt; i++) {
> struct net_device *ndev;
>
> - ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(smb_dev->ib_dev,
> - i + 1);
> - if (!ndev)
> - continue;
> + if (smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev) {
> + ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(
> + smb_dev->ib_dev, i + 1);
> + if (!ndev)
> + continue;
>
> - if (ndev == netdev) {
> + if (ndev == netdev) {
> + dev_put(ndev);
> + rdma_capable = true;
> + goto out;
> + }
> dev_put(ndev);
> - rdma_capable = true;
> - goto out;
> + /* if ib_dev does not implement ops.get_netdev
> + * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
> + } else if (netdev->type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) {
> + struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
> + union ib_gid gid;
> + u32 port_num;
> + int ret;
> +
> + netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(
> + ha, &netdev->dev_addrs) {
> + memcpy(&gid, ha->addr + 4, sizeof(gid));
> + ret = ib_find_gid(smb_dev->ib_dev, &gid,
> + &port_num, NULL);
> + if (!ret) {
> + rdma_capable = true;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> }
> - dev_put(ndev);
> }
> }
> out:
> --
> 2.42.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev()
2023-10-20 14:45 ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2023-10-20 20:27 ` Tom Talpey
2023-10-20 23:08 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Talpey @ 2023-10-20 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namjae Jeon, Kangjing "Chaser" Huang
Cc: linux-cifs, smfrench, senozhatsky, atteh.mailbox
On 10/20/2023 10:45 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> 2023-10-20 22:02 GMT+09:00, Kangjing "Chaser" Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>:
>> Physical ib_device does not have an underlying net_device, thus its
>> association with IPoIB net_device cannot be retrieved via
>> ops.get_netdev() or ib_device_get_by_netdev(). ksmbd reads physical
>> ib_device port GUID from the lower 16 bytes of the hardware addresses on
>> IPoIB net_device and match its underlying ib_device using ib_find_gid()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kangjing Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
> Can you fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl ? You need to run it like
> this. ./scripts/checkpatch.pl [patch]
>
> WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
> #148: FILE: fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c:2256:
> + * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
>
> WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: "Kangjing
> \Chaser\ Huang" <huangkangjing@gmail.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Kangjing
> Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>'
>
> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 54 lines checked
>
>
> And have you made this patch on linux 6.6-rc6 kernel ? because I can't
> apply this patch with the following error.
>
> checking file fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 2140.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 2241.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED
>
> Thanks.
With these glitches addressed, please add my
Reviewed-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Thanks for the update.
>>
>> v2 -> v1:
>> * Add more detailed description to comment
>> ---
>> fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>> b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>> index 3b269e1f523a..a623e29b2760 100644
>> --- a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>> +++ b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>> @@ -2140,8 +2140,7 @@ static int smb_direct_ib_client_add(struct ib_device
>> *ib_dev)
>> if (ib_dev->node_type != RDMA_NODE_IB_CA)
>> smb_direct_port = SMB_DIRECT_PORT_IWARP;
>>
>> - if (!ib_dev->ops.get_netdev ||
>> - !rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
>> + if (!rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
>> return 0;
>>
>> smb_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*smb_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -2241,17 +2240,37 @@ bool ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev(struct net_device
>> *netdev)
>> for (i = 0; i < smb_dev->ib_dev->phys_port_cnt; i++) {
>> struct net_device *ndev;
>>
>> - ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(smb_dev->ib_dev,
>> - i + 1);
>> - if (!ndev)
>> - continue;
>> + if (smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev) {
>> + ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(
>> + smb_dev->ib_dev, i + 1);
>> + if (!ndev)
>> + continue;
>>
>> - if (ndev == netdev) {
>> + if (ndev == netdev) {
>> + dev_put(ndev);
>> + rdma_capable = true;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> dev_put(ndev);
>> - rdma_capable = true;
>> - goto out;
>> + /* if ib_dev does not implement ops.get_netdev
>> + * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
>> + } else if (netdev->type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) {
>> + struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
>> + union ib_gid gid;
>> + u32 port_num;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(
>> + ha, &netdev->dev_addrs) {
>> + memcpy(&gid, ha->addr + 4, sizeof(gid));
>> + ret = ib_find_gid(smb_dev->ib_dev, &gid,
>> + &port_num, NULL);
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + rdma_capable = true;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>> - dev_put(ndev);
>> }
>> }
>> out:
>> --
>> 2.42.0
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev()
2023-10-20 20:27 ` Tom Talpey
@ 2023-10-20 23:08 ` Namjae Jeon
2023-10-21 7:37 ` Kangjing Huang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2023-10-20 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Talpey
Cc: Kangjing "Chaser" Huang, linux-cifs, smfrench,
senozhatsky, atteh.mailbox
2023-10-21 5:27 GMT+09:00, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>:
> On 10/20/2023 10:45 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> 2023-10-20 22:02 GMT+09:00, Kangjing "Chaser" Huang
>> <huangkangjing@gmail.com>:
>>> Physical ib_device does not have an underlying net_device, thus its
>>> association with IPoIB net_device cannot be retrieved via
>>> ops.get_netdev() or ib_device_get_by_netdev(). ksmbd reads physical
>>> ib_device port GUID from the lower 16 bytes of the hardware addresses on
>>> IPoIB net_device and match its underlying ib_device using ib_find_gid()
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kangjing Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>
>>> Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>> Can you fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl ? You need to run it like
>> this. ./scripts/checkpatch.pl [patch]
>>
>> WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
>> #148: FILE: fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c:2256:
>> + * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
>>
>> WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: "Kangjing
>> \Chaser\ Huang" <huangkangjing@gmail.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Kangjing
>> Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>'
>>
>> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 54 lines checked
>>
>>
>> And have you made this patch on linux 6.6-rc6 kernel ? because I can't
>> apply this patch with the following error.
>>
>> checking file fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 2140.
>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 2241.
>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> With these glitches addressed, please add my
>
> Reviewed-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Thanks for your review!
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
>>>
>>> v2 -> v1:
>>> * Add more detailed description to comment
>>> ---
>>> fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c | 39
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>> b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>> index 3b269e1f523a..a623e29b2760 100644
>>> --- a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>> +++ b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>> @@ -2140,8 +2140,7 @@ static int smb_direct_ib_client_add(struct
>>> ib_device
>>> *ib_dev)
>>> if (ib_dev->node_type != RDMA_NODE_IB_CA)
>>> smb_direct_port = SMB_DIRECT_PORT_IWARP;
>>>
>>> - if (!ib_dev->ops.get_netdev ||
>>> - !rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
>>> + if (!rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> smb_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*smb_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> @@ -2241,17 +2240,37 @@ bool ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev(struct net_device
>>> *netdev)
>>> for (i = 0; i < smb_dev->ib_dev->phys_port_cnt; i++) {
>>> struct net_device *ndev;
>>>
>>> - ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(smb_dev->ib_dev,
>>> - i + 1);
>>> - if (!ndev)
>>> - continue;
>>> + if (smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev) {
>>> + ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(
>>> + smb_dev->ib_dev, i + 1);
>>> + if (!ndev)
>>> + continue;
>>>
>>> - if (ndev == netdev) {
>>> + if (ndev == netdev) {
>>> + dev_put(ndev);
>>> + rdma_capable = true;
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> dev_put(ndev);
>>> - rdma_capable = true;
>>> - goto out;
>>> + /* if ib_dev does not implement ops.get_netdev
>>> + * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
>>> + } else if (netdev->type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) {
>>> + struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
>>> + union ib_gid gid;
>>> + u32 port_num;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(
>>> + ha, &netdev->dev_addrs) {
>>> + memcpy(&gid, ha->addr + 4, sizeof(gid));
>>> + ret = ib_find_gid(smb_dev->ib_dev, &gid,
>>> + &port_num, NULL);
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> + rdma_capable = true;
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> - dev_put(ndev);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> out:
>>> --
>>> 2.42.0
>>>
>>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev()
2023-10-20 23:08 ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2023-10-21 7:37 ` Kangjing Huang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kangjing Huang @ 2023-10-21 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namjae Jeon, Tom Talpey; +Cc: linux-cifs, smfrench, senozhatsky, atteh.mailbox
On 10/20/23 19:08, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> 2023-10-21 5:27 GMT+09:00, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>:
>> On 10/20/2023 10:45 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>>> 2023-10-20 22:02 GMT+09:00, Kangjing "Chaser" Huang
>>> <huangkangjing@gmail.com>:
>>>> Physical ib_device does not have an underlying net_device, thus its
>>>> association with IPoIB net_device cannot be retrieved via
>>>> ops.get_netdev() or ib_device_get_by_netdev(). ksmbd reads physical
>>>> ib_device port GUID from the lower 16 bytes of the hardware addresses on
>>>> IPoIB net_device and match its underlying ib_device using ib_find_gid()
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kangjing Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>>> Can you fix the warnings from checkpatch.pl ? You need to run it like
>>> this. ./scripts/checkpatch.pl [patch]
>>>
>>> WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
>>> #148: FILE: fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c:2256:
>>> + * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
>>>
>>> WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: "Kangjing
>>> \Chaser\ Huang" <huangkangjing@gmail.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: Kangjing
>>> Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>'
>>>
>>> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 54 lines checked
>>>
>>>
>>> And have you made this patch on linux 6.6-rc6 kernel ? because I can't
>>> apply this patch with the following error.
>>>
>>> checking file fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 2140.
>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 2241.
>>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED
>>>
Sorry about that. I did do it on v6.6-rc6. It may be my mail client's
issue with plain text emails, I'm sending again together with the
comment format fixed and the review tag using git send-email.
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> With these glitches addressed, please add my
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
> Thanks for your review!
>>
>> Thanks for the update.
>>
>>>>
>>>> v2 -> v1:
>>>> * Add more detailed description to comment
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c | 39
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>>> b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>>> index 3b269e1f523a..a623e29b2760 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c
>>>> @@ -2140,8 +2140,7 @@ static int smb_direct_ib_client_add(struct
>>>> ib_device
>>>> *ib_dev)
>>>> if (ib_dev->node_type != RDMA_NODE_IB_CA)
>>>> smb_direct_port = SMB_DIRECT_PORT_IWARP;
>>>>
>>>> - if (!ib_dev->ops.get_netdev ||
>>>> - !rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
>>>> + if (!rdma_frwr_is_supported(&ib_dev->attrs))
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>> smb_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*smb_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> @@ -2241,17 +2240,37 @@ bool ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev(struct net_device
>>>> *netdev)
>>>> for (i = 0; i < smb_dev->ib_dev->phys_port_cnt; i++) {
>>>> struct net_device *ndev;
>>>>
>>>> - ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(smb_dev->ib_dev,
>>>> - i + 1);
>>>> - if (!ndev)
>>>> - continue;
>>>> + if (smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev) {
>>>> + ndev = smb_dev->ib_dev->ops.get_netdev(
>>>> + smb_dev->ib_dev, i + 1);
>>>> + if (!ndev)
>>>> + continue;
>>>>
>>>> - if (ndev == netdev) {
>>>> + if (ndev == netdev) {
>>>> + dev_put(ndev);
>>>> + rdma_capable = true;
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>>> dev_put(ndev);
>>>> - rdma_capable = true;
>>>> - goto out;
>>>> + /* if ib_dev does not implement ops.get_netdev
>>>> + * check for matching infiniband GUID in hw_addr */
>>>> + } else if (netdev->type == ARPHRD_INFINIBAND) {
>>>> + struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
>>>> + union ib_gid gid;
>>>> + u32 port_num;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(
>>>> + ha, &netdev->dev_addrs) {
>>>> + memcpy(&gid, ha->addr + 4, sizeof(gid));
>>>> + ret = ib_find_gid(smb_dev->ib_dev, &gid,
>>>> + &port_num, NULL);
>>>> + if (!ret) {
>>>> + rdma_capable = true;
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>> - dev_put(ndev);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> out:
>>>> --
>>>> 2.42.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-21 7:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-20 13:02 [PATCH v2] ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev() Kangjing "Chaser" Huang
2023-10-20 14:45 ` Namjae Jeon
2023-10-20 20:27 ` Tom Talpey
2023-10-20 23:08 ` Namjae Jeon
2023-10-21 7:37 ` Kangjing Huang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox