Re: [PATCH 6.16 563/627] smb: client: let send_done() cleanup before calling smbd_disconnect_rdma_connection()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:04:11AM +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Am 13.08.25 um 09:59 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:17:53AM +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > Am 12.08.25 um 19:34 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > > > 6.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > ------------------
> > > > 
> > > > From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
> > > > 
> > > > [ Upstream commit 5349ae5e05fa37409fd48a1eb483b199c32c889b ]
> > > 
> > > This needs this patch
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/20250812164506.29170-1-metze@samba.org/T/#u
> > > as follow up fix that is not yet upstream.
> > > 
> > > The same applies to all other branches (6.15, 6.12, 6.6, ...)
> > 
> > Thanks, now queued up.
> 
> Even if it's not upstream yet?
> I thought the policy is that upstream is required first...
> 
> It's only here
> https://git.samba.org/?p=sfrench/cifs-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-next
> as
> https://git.samba.org/?p=sfrench/cifs-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b2b8a6a5827848250c0caf075b23256bab4ac88
> 
> But that commit hash can change on rebase.

Ah, I thought since this was in linux-next it would not rebase.  Having
public trees that rebase is dangerous...

Anyway, I'll go drop both of these now, please let us know when you want
these added back.

thanks,

greg k-h