Re: [PATCH 6.16 563/627] smb: client: let send_done() cleanup before calling smbd_disconnect_rdma_connection()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 11:45:31AM +0200, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> > > > > Am 12.08.25 um 19:34 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > > > > > 6.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ------------------
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > [ Upstream commit 5349ae5e05fa37409fd48a1eb483b199c32c889b ]
> > > > > 
> > > > > This needs this patch
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/20250812164506.29170-1-metze@samba.org/T/#u
> > > > > as follow up fix that is not yet upstream.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The same applies to all other branches (6.15, 6.12, 6.6, ...)
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks, now queued up.
> > > 
> > > Even if it's not upstream yet?
> > > I thought the policy is that upstream is required first...
> > > 
> > > It's only here
> > > https://git.samba.org/?p=sfrench/cifs-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-next
> > > as
> > > https://git.samba.org/?p=sfrench/cifs-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=8b2b8a6a5827848250c0caf075b23256bab4ac88
> > > 
> > > But that commit hash can change on rebase.
> > 
> > Ah, I thought since this was in linux-next it would not rebase.  Having
> > public trees that rebase is dangerous...
> > 
> > Anyway, I'll go drop both of these now, please let us know when you want
> > these added back.
> 
> It landed as 8c48e1c7520321cc87ff651e96093e2f412785fb, so
> 5349ae5e05fa37409fd48a1eb483b199c32c889b can be backported
> with 8c48e1c7520321cc87ff651e96093e2f412785fb being the fixup.

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h