From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Etienne Champetier <champetier.etienne@gmail.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, openafs-devel@openafs.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] afs, bash: Fix open(O_CREAT) on an extant AFS file in a sticky dir
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 09:30:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2164801.1747125039@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513-dividende-kursniveau-014674876b04@brauner>
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:
> There's a few other places where we compare vfsuids:
>
> * may_delete()
> -> check_sticky()
> -> __check_sticky()
>
> * may_follow_link()
>
> * may_linkat()
>
> * fsuidgid_has_mapping()
>
> Anyone of those need special treatment on AFS as well?
That's a good question. I think it might be better to switch back to the v1
patch - which gives me two separate ops and provide a couple of vfs wrappers
for them and use them more widely.
So, perhaps:
vfs_have_same_owner(inode1, inode2)
which indicates if the two inodes have the same ownership and:
vfs_is_owned_by_me(inode)
which compares the inode's ownership to current_fsuid() by default.
The following places need to be considered for being changed:
(*) chown_ok()
(*) chgrp_ok()
Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me(). Possibly these need to defer all their
checks to the network filesystem as the interpretation of the target
UID/GID depends on the netfs.
(*) do_coredump()
Should probably call vfs_is_owned_by_me() to check that the file created
is owned by the caller - but the check that's there might be sufficient.
(*) inode_owner_or_capable()
Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me(). I'm not sure whether the namespace
mapping makes sense in such a case, but it probably could be used.
(*) vfs_setlease()
Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me(). Actually, it should query if leasing
is permitted.
Also, setting locks could perhaps do with a permission call to the
filesystem driver as AFS, for example, has a lock permission bit in the
ACL, but since the AFS server checks that when the RPC call is made, it's
probably unnecessary.
(*) acl_permission_check()
(*) posix_acl_permission()
UIDs are part of these ACLs, so no change required. AFS implements its
own ACLs and evaluates them in ->permission() and on the server.
(*) may_follow_link()
Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me() and also vfs_have_same_owner() on the
the link and its parent dir. The latter only applies on world-writable
sticky dirs.
(*) may_create_in_sticky()
The initial subject of this patch. Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me() and
also vfs_have_same_owner() both.
(*) __check_sticky()
Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me() on both the dir and the inode.
(*) may_dedupe_file()
Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me().
(*) IMA policy ops.
No idea.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 16:37 [PATCH] afs, bash: Fix open(O_CREAT) on an extant AFS file in a sticky dir David Howells
2025-04-29 17:35 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2025-04-30 15:09 ` Chet Ramey
2025-04-30 16:14 ` David Howells
2025-04-30 17:26 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2025-04-30 18:36 ` Chet Ramey
2025-05-05 13:14 ` Christian Brauner
[not found] ` <CAOdf3grbDQ-Fh2bV7XfoYvVBhgBAh7-hZyyxTNt1RfGekrA-nA@mail.gmail.com>
2025-05-05 14:42 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2025-05-14 12:50 ` Chet Ramey
2025-05-06 10:26 ` David Howells
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Christian Brauner
2025-05-12 13:02 ` [PATCH v2] " David Howells
2025-05-13 7:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-05-13 8:30 ` David Howells [this message]
2025-05-13 15:44 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2025-05-14 12:49 ` [PATCH] " Chet Ramey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2164801.1747125039@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=champetier.etienne@gmail.com \
--cc=chet.ramey@case.edu \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=openafs-devel@openafs.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox