Linux CIFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Etienne Champetier <champetier.etienne@gmail.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
	Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>,
	Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, openafs-devel@openafs.org,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] afs, bash: Fix open(O_CREAT) on an extant AFS file in a sticky dir
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 09:30:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2164801.1747125039@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513-dividende-kursniveau-014674876b04@brauner>

Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:

> There's a few other places where we compare vfsuids:
> 
> * may_delete()
>   -> check_sticky()
>      -> __check_sticky()
> 
> * may_follow_link()
> 
> * may_linkat()
> 
> * fsuidgid_has_mapping()
> 
> Anyone of those need special treatment on AFS as well?

That's a good question.  I think it might be better to switch back to the v1
patch - which gives me two separate ops and provide a couple of vfs wrappers
for them and use them more widely.

So, perhaps:

	vfs_have_same_owner(inode1, inode2)

which indicates if the two inodes have the same ownership and:

	vfs_is_owned_by_me(inode)

which compares the inode's ownership to current_fsuid() by default.

The following places need to be considered for being changed:

 (*) chown_ok()
 (*) chgrp_ok()

     Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me().  Possibly these need to defer all their
     checks to the network filesystem as the interpretation of the target
     UID/GID depends on the netfs.

 (*) do_coredump()

     Should probably call vfs_is_owned_by_me() to check that the file created
     is owned by the caller - but the check that's there might be sufficient.

 (*) inode_owner_or_capable()

     Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me().  I'm not sure whether the namespace
     mapping makes sense in such a case, but it probably could be used.

 (*) vfs_setlease()

     Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me().  Actually, it should query if leasing
     is permitted.

     Also, setting locks could perhaps do with a permission call to the
     filesystem driver as AFS, for example, has a lock permission bit in the
     ACL, but since the AFS server checks that when the RPC call is made, it's
     probably unnecessary.

 (*) acl_permission_check()
 (*) posix_acl_permission()

     UIDs are part of these ACLs, so no change required.  AFS implements its
     own ACLs and evaluates them in ->permission() and on the server.

 (*) may_follow_link()

     Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me() and also vfs_have_same_owner() on the
     the link and its parent dir.  The latter only applies on world-writable
     sticky dirs.

 (*) may_create_in_sticky()

     The initial subject of this patch.  Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me() and
     also vfs_have_same_owner() both.

 (*) __check_sticky()

     Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me() on both the dir and the inode.

 (*) may_dedupe_file()

     Should call vfs_is_owned_by_me().

 (*) IMA policy ops.

     No idea.

David


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-13  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29 16:37 [PATCH] afs, bash: Fix open(O_CREAT) on an extant AFS file in a sticky dir David Howells
2025-04-29 17:35 ` Jeffrey E Altman
2025-04-30 15:09   ` Chet Ramey
2025-04-30 16:14     ` David Howells
2025-04-30 17:26       ` Jeffrey E Altman
2025-04-30 18:36         ` Chet Ramey
2025-05-05 13:14 ` Christian Brauner
     [not found]   ` <CAOdf3grbDQ-Fh2bV7XfoYvVBhgBAh7-hZyyxTNt1RfGekrA-nA@mail.gmail.com>
2025-05-05 14:42     ` Jeffrey E Altman
2025-05-14 12:50       ` Chet Ramey
2025-05-06 10:26   ` David Howells
2025-05-09 10:33     ` Christian Brauner
2025-05-12 13:02       ` [PATCH v2] " David Howells
2025-05-13  7:49         ` Christian Brauner
2025-05-13  8:30           ` David Howells [this message]
2025-05-13 15:44             ` Jeffrey E Altman
2025-05-14 12:49   ` [PATCH] " Chet Ramey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2164801.1747125039@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=champetier.etienne@gmail.com \
    --cc=chet.ramey@case.edu \
    --cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=openafs-devel@openafs.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox