Re: [PATCH] clk: lpc32xx: do not prepare clock "0"

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>]

On 02/10, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
> 
> On 09.02.2016 22:11, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 11:03 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> On 02/09, slemieux.tyco@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
> >>>
> >>> The following errors are display in the console during the power-on:
> >>> [    0.000000] lpc32xx_usb_clk_init: failed to register (null) clock: -12
> >>> [    0.000000] lpc32xx_clk_init: failed to register (null) clock: -12
> >>>
> >>> There is no need to prepare clock "0"; the first clock used is 1;
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> Do you mean register instead of prepare? Change looks ok
> >> otherwise.
> >>
> > Should read register in the description;
> > I will submit a new version of the patch tomorrow.
> > 
> 
> thanks for catching this leftover after renumbering clocks starting from 1.
> 
> Feel free to add to v2
> 
> Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
> 

I subbed register for prepare and added this ack and pushed to
clk-next.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project