Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC

* Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC
       [not found] <20170222231738.HXRSmi86@smtp1o.mail.yandex.net>
@ 2017-02-24  0:20 ` Maxime Ripard
  2017-02-28 15:50   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2017-02-24  0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Icenowy Zheng
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Chen-Yu Tsai, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, linux-gpio,
	linux-sunxi, linux-clk, linux-arm-kernel

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1126 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 2017年2月22日 07:03于 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>写道：
> >
> > Hi, 
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: 
> > > Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the 
> > > SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex. 
> > > 
> > > Add support for it. 
> > > 
> > > As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with 
> > > knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source. 
> >
> > Missing SoB. 
> >
> > Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't? 
> 
> There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related
> drivers RFC.
> 
> Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is
> available now.
> 
> For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess --
> so it's not RFC.

It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC
tags.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread