* Re: [GIT PULL 07/11] memory: tegra: Changes for v5.8-rc1
[not found] ` <20200515145311.1580134-8-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
@ 2020-05-25 21:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-26 11:40 ` Thierry Reding
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2020-05-25 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thierry Reding
Cc: arm-soc, SoC Team, Jon Hunter,
open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT, Linux ARM, linux-clk,
Stephen Boyd, Michael Turquette
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:53 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> memory: tegra: Changes for v5.8-rc1
>
> Contains a few cleanup patches and an implementation to scale the EMC
> frequency on Tegra210 systems.
I don't mind taking the memory driver patches, but it seems odd that this
pull request has so many drivers/clk changes but does not mention that
in the pull request, and does not Cc the clk maintainers or include Acks
from them.
I would assume that the reason for this is that you have based
the memory controller changes on a branch that was already
accepted by the clk maintainers in to their tree, but when you do that
please be more explicit so I know what is going on.
Waiting for clarification before I can pull this.
Arnd
> Dmitry Osipenko (9):
> dt-bindings: cpufreq: Add binding for NVIDIA Tegra20/30
> clk: tegra: Add custom CCLK implementation
> clk: tegra: pll: Add pre/post rate-change hooks
> clk: tegra: cclk: Add helpers for handling PLLX rate changes
> clk: tegra20: Use custom CCLK implementation
> clk: tegra30: Use custom CCLK implementation
> Joseph Lo (7):
> dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Add external memory controller binding for Tegra210
> clk: tegra: Add PLLP_UD and PLLMB_UD for Tegra210
> clk: tegra: Export functions for EMC clock scaling
> clk: tegra: Implement Tegra210 EMC clock
> clk: tegra: Remove the old emc_mux clock for Tegra210
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL 07/11] memory: tegra: Changes for v5.8-rc1
2020-05-25 21:52 ` [GIT PULL 07/11] memory: tegra: Changes for v5.8-rc1 Arnd Bergmann
@ 2020-05-26 11:40 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <159053113019.88029.6264653349405850933@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2020-05-26 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: arm-soc, SoC Team, Jon Hunter,
open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT, Linux ARM, linux-clk,
Stephen Boyd, Michael Turquette
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1652 bytes --]
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:52:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:53 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > memory: tegra: Changes for v5.8-rc1
> >
> > Contains a few cleanup patches and an implementation to scale the EMC
> > frequency on Tegra210 systems.
>
> I don't mind taking the memory driver patches, but it seems odd that this
> pull request has so many drivers/clk changes but does not mention that
> in the pull request, and does not Cc the clk maintainers or include Acks
> from them.
>
> I would assume that the reason for this is that you have based
> the memory controller changes on a branch that was already
> accepted by the clk maintainers in to their tree, but when you do that
> please be more explicit so I know what is going on.
So historically there's often a lot of dependencies, either build-time
or runtime, between Tegra clock patches and other work. That's why we
ended up with this model where I collect Tegra clock patches in the
Tegra tree and it's not uncommon to end up with the clock branch being
a dependency of one of the other branches.
I did send this to Mike and Stephen about 1 1/2 weeks ago, but it does
not look like they've pulled it into the clk tree yet.
I typically highlight the dependencies in the pull request, but looks
like I forgot to do that this time around.
> Waiting for clarification before I can pull this.
Given the above, might be best to hold off on this for a bit until the
clock branch was pulled by Mike or Stephen.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL 07/11] memory: tegra: Changes for v5.8-rc1
[not found] ` <159053113019.88029.6264653349405850933@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
@ 2020-06-15 14:02 ` Thierry Reding
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2020-06-15 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Stephen Boyd, arm, soc, Jon Hunter, linux-tegra, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-clk, Michael Turquette
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 583 bytes --]
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:12:10PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Thierry Reding (2020-05-26 04:40:54)
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:52:30PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > Waiting for clarification before I can pull this.
> >
> > Given the above, might be best to hold off on this for a bit until the
> > clock branch was pulled by Mike or Stephen.
> >
>
> I pulled the clk branch into clk-next now.
Hi Arnd,
looks like this pull request didn't make it into v5.8-rc1. Was there
anything left here that you're waiting for me to address?
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-15 14:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20200515145311.1580134-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20200515145311.1580134-8-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
2020-05-25 21:52 ` [GIT PULL 07/11] memory: tegra: Changes for v5.8-rc1 Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-26 11:40 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <159053113019.88029.6264653349405850933@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
2020-06-15 14:02 ` Thierry Reding
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox