From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ernest Van Hoecke" <ernestvanhoecke@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO nexus maps
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 14:28:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910142819.DFA381F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910-fw-devlink-nexus-ready-v2-1-17ac82dbe226@toradex.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Stack buffer overflow when parsing `#<stem>-cells` property.
- [High] Infinite loop during device tree map traversal.
--
commit 07389d4c4496496ba5a738fbae28d5c3df4427f8
Author: Ernest Van Hoecke <ernest.vanhoecke@toradex.com>
of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO nexus maps
This commit modifies fw_devlink to parse GPIO properties using a map-aware
parser instead of direct phandle references. This ensures fw_devlink resolves
the same provider as the GPIO consumer API, properly deferring consumers until
the nexus translation node is available.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/juuc4af7ndbajcl7gzf4tg5qz2q2j5tt3rvql4jbauradujrre@gc5nbdhhixaf/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 72cf12907de03..380df0861ab97 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1311,6 +1311,19 @@ static struct device_node *parse_prop_cells(struct device_node *np,
> return sup_args.np;
> }
>
> +static struct device_node *parse_nexus_prop(struct device_node *np,
> + const char *prop_name, int index,
> + const char *stem_name)
> +{
> + struct of_phandle_args sup_args;
> +
> + if (of_parse_phandle_with_args_map(np, prop_name, stem_name, index,
> + &sup_args))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return sup_args.np;
> +}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but by using of_parse_phandle_with_args_map()
during early boot for all -gpio(s) properties, does this expose a stack
buffer overflow to malformed Device Trees?
Looking at of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() in drivers/of/base.c, it reads
list_size from a Device Tree property (e.g., #gpio-cells) without checking
if it exceeds MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS:
drivers/of/base.c:of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() {
...
ret = of_property_read_u32(cur, cells_name, &list_size);
if (ret < 0)
goto put;
/* Precalculate the match array - this simplifies match loop */
for (i = 0; i < list_size; i++)
initial_match_array[i] = cpu_to_be32(out_args->args[i]);
...
}
If a malformed DT provides a cells property greater than 16, this loop will
read past the end of out_args->args and write past the end of the
initial_match_array stack buffer. Can this lead to memory corruption or a
kernel panic during early boot?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does calling
of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() here also expose an infinite loop when
traversing cyclic maps?
Looking at the map traversal loop in of_parse_phandle_with_args_map():
drivers/of/base.c:of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() {
...
while (cur) {
/* Get the <list>-map property */
map = of_get_property(cur, map_name, &map_len);
...
/* Iterate again with new provider */
out_args->np = new;
of_node_put(cur);
cur = new;
new = NULL;
}
...
}
Since there is no depth limit or cycle detection, if a Device Tree has a
cyclic map structure (where Node A maps to Node B, which maps back to Node A),
will this loop hang infinitely and cause a hard lockup?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260910-fw-devlink-nexus-ready-v2-0-17ac82dbe226@toradex.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 14:16 [PATCH v2 0/7] of: property: Make fw_devlink follow GPIO, PWM and clock nexus maps Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-11 7:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Report unsupported supplier linking Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with GPIO nexus maps Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-11 7:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow PWM " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow clock " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with " Ernest Van Hoecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910142819.DFA381F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ernestvanhoecke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox