From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ernest Van Hoecke" <ernestvanhoecke@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow PWM nexus maps
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 14:31:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260910143106.B457C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910-fw-devlink-nexus-ready-v2-4-17ac82dbe226@toradex.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Missing bounds check in `of_parse_phandle_with_args_map` allows a malformed Devicetree to trigger a stack buffer overflow.
- [High] Missing cycle detection in `of_parse_phandle_with_args_map` allows a malformed Devicetree to cause an infinite loop.
--
commit 17ae1bc408452875cfad3c0d990add52c676f9b9
Author: Ernest Van Hoecke <ernest.vanhoecke@toradex.com>
of: property: fw_devlink: Follow PWM nexus maps
PWM consumers use of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() to resolve specifiers
through pwm-map properties. fw_devlink instead parses the pwms property
as a direct phandle reference, so it records the nexus node as the
supplier rather than the mapped PWM provider.
Use the map-aware parser for pwms so fw_devlink resolves the same
provider as the PWM consumer API. Direct PWM references continue to work
because the map-aware parser returns the original provider when no
pwm-map property is present.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/juuc4af7ndbajcl7gzf4tg5qz2q2j5tt3rvql4jbauradujrre@gc5nbdhhixaf/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index eba7e9fe6c386..a9c51d639a2b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1426,7 +1435,7 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(extcon, "extcon", NULL)
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(nvmem_cells, "nvmem-cells", "#nvmem-cell-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(phys, "phys", "#phy-cells")
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(wakeup_parent, "wakeup-parent", NULL)
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pwms, "pwms", "#pwm-cells")
> +DEFINE_SIMPLE_NEXUS_PROP(pwms, "pwms", "pwm")
[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but this change exposes a
pre-existing stack buffer overflow in of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() by
parsing pwms properties automatically during early boot.
Does this code overflow initial_match_array[]? If a provider node in a
malformed Devicetree has a #pwm-cells property larger than MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS
(16), list_size is read without bounds checking:
drivers/of/base.c:of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() {
...
/* Precalculate the match array - this simplifies match loop */
for (i = 0; i < list_size; i++)
initial_match_array[i] = cpu_to_be32(out_args->args[i]);
...
}
Because fw_devlink now automatically calls parse_nexus_prop() and
of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() for all pwms properties, this regression can
now be trivially triggered without requiring consumer drivers to probe.
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but this patch similarly expands the attack
surface by triggering it automatically during early boot via fw_devlink.
Can this loop run infinitely if the Devicetree contains cyclic phandle maps?
When following <list>-map properties through nexus nodes, there is no cycle
detection or maximum depth limit:
drivers/of/base.c:of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() {
...
while (cur) {
/* Get the <list>-map property */
map = of_get_property(cur, map_name, &map_len);
...
}
If a pwm-map property contains cyclic references (e.g., node A maps to node B,
and node B maps back to node A), could this cause a system hang or deadlock
during boot?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260910-fw-devlink-nexus-ready-v2-0-17ac82dbe226@toradex.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 14:16 [PATCH v2 0/7] of: property: Make fw_devlink follow GPIO, PWM and clock nexus maps Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 7:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Report unsupported supplier linking Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with GPIO nexus maps Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-11 7:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow PWM " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow clock " Ernest Van Hoecke
2026-09-10 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] of: unittest: Test fw_devlink with " Ernest Van Hoecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260910143106.B457C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ernestvanhoecke@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox