public inbox for linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
To: sboyd@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
Cc: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: super: Fix error handling and resolve unsigned compare warning
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:59:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2792406.iZASKD2KPV@senjougahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3841056.aeNJFYEL58@senjougahara>

On Thursday, September 18, 2025 10:55 AM Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On Friday, August 29, 2025 10:16 AM Pei Xiao wrote:
> > ./drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c:156:5-9: WARNING:
> >         Unsigned expression compared with zero: rate < 0
> > 
> > The unsigned long 'rate' variable caused:
> > - Incorrect handling of negative errors
> > - Compile warning: "Unsigned expression compared with zero"
> > 
> > Fix by changing to long type and adding req->rate cast.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pei Xiao <xiaopei01@kylinos.cn>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c
> > index 7ec47942720c..643b3cb83cd0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-super.c
> > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int clk_super_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> >  {
> >  	struct tegra_clk_super_mux *super = to_clk_super_mux(hw);
> >  	struct clk_hw *div_hw = &super->frac_div.hw;
> > -	unsigned long rate;
> > +	long rate;
> >  
> >  	__clk_hw_set_clk(div_hw, hw);
> >  
> > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int clk_super_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> >  	if (rate < 0)
> >  		return rate;
> >  
> > -	req->rate = rate;
> > +	req->rate = (unsigned long)rate;
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > 
> 
> The proper fix for this would be to implement and call div_ops->determine_rate instead of round_rate. With the cast-to-long approach, rates above 2147MHz will incorrectly show as errors. While for this clock in particular I don't think we can reach those rates, I don't think this improves the situation either, as the round_rate implementation invoked here never returns errors.
> 
> Mikko
> 
> 

Looking up the list, looks like Brian Masney already got to it.

Cheers,
Mikko




      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18  1:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-29  1:16 [PATCH] clk: tegra: super: Fix error handling and resolve unsigned compare warning Pei Xiao
2025-09-18  1:55 ` Mikko Perttunen
2025-09-18  1:59   ` Mikko Perttunen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2792406.iZASKD2KPV@senjougahara \
    --to=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiaopei01@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox