public inbox for linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Adrian Alonso <adrian.alonso@nxp.com>,
	Mads Bligaard Nielsen <bli@bang-olufsen.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Support dynamic rates
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:13:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yhjj8o3vEQy0qysO@abelvesa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225082937.2746176-9-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

On 22-02-25 09:29:37, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The pll1443x PLL so far only supports rates from a rate table passed
> during initialization. Calculating PLL settings dynamically helps audio
> applications to get their desired rates, so support for this is added
> in this patch.
> 
> The strategy to get to the PLL setting for a rate is:
> 
> - First try to only adjust kdiv which specifies the fractional part of the PLL.
>   This setting can be changed without glitches on the output and is therefore
>   preferred
> - When that isn't possible then the rate table is searched for suitable rates,
>   so for standard rates the same settings are used as without this patch
> - As a last resort the best settings are calculated dynamically
> 
> The code in this patch is based on patches from Adrian Alonso <adrian.alonso@nxp.com>
> and Mads Bligaard Nielsen <bli@bang-olufsen.dk>

Hmm, I wish this was also possible for SSCG plls.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> index 646e0ce7d6242..eef0f3b693ed9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
>  #define PDIV_MASK	GENMASK(9, 4)
>  #define SDIV_MASK	GENMASK(2, 0)
>  #define KDIV_MASK	GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define KDIV_MIN	SHRT_MIN
> +#define KDIV_MAX	SHRT_MAX
>  
>  #define LOCK_TIMEOUT_US		10000
>  
> @@ -113,7 +115,106 @@ static long pll14xx_calc_rate(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, int mdiv, int pdiv,
>  	return fvco;
>  }
>  
> -static long clk_pll14xx_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +static long pll1443x_calc_kdiv(int mdiv, int pdiv, int sdiv,
> +		unsigned long rate, unsigned long prate)
> +{
> +	long kdiv;
> +
> +	/* calc kdiv = round(rate * pdiv * 65536 * 2^sdiv / prate) - (mdiv * 65536) */
> +	kdiv = ((rate * ((pdiv * 65536) << sdiv) + prate / 2) / prate) - (mdiv * 65536);
> +
> +	return clamp_t(short, kdiv, KDIV_MIN, KDIV_MAX);
> +}
> +
> +static void imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, unsigned long rate,
> +				      unsigned long prate, struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *t)
> +{
> +	u32 pll_div_ctl0, pll_div_ctl1;
> +	int mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv;
> +	long fvco, rate_min, rate_max, dist, best = LONG_MAX;
> +	const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *tt;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Fractional PLL constrains:
> +	 *
> +	 * a) 6MHz <= prate <= 25MHz
> +	 * b) 1 <= p <= 63 (1 <= p <= 4 prate = 24MHz)
> +	 * c) 64 <= m <= 1023
> +	 * d) 0 <= s <= 6
> +	 * e) -32768 <= k <= 32767
> +	 *
> +	 * fvco = (m * 65536 + k) * prate / (p * 65536)
> +	 */
> +
> +	pll_div_ctl0 = readl_relaxed(pll->base + DIV_CTL0);
> +	mdiv = FIELD_GET(MDIV_MASK, pll_div_ctl0);
> +	pdiv = FIELD_GET(PDIV_MASK, pll_div_ctl0);
> +	sdiv = FIELD_GET(SDIV_MASK, pll_div_ctl0);
> +	pll_div_ctl1 = readl_relaxed(pll->base + DIV_CTL1);
> +
> +	/* First see if we can get the desired rate by only adjusting kdiv (glitch free) */
> +	rate_min = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, KDIV_MIN, prate);
> +	rate_max = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, KDIV_MAX, prate);
> +
> +	if (rate >= rate_min && rate <= rate_max) {
> +		kdiv = pll1443x_calc_kdiv(mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, rate, prate);
> +		pr_debug("%s: in=%ld, want=%ld Only adjust kdiv %ld -> %d\n",
> +			 clk_hw_get_name(&pll->hw), prate, rate,
> +			 FIELD_GET(KDIV_MASK, pll_div_ctl1), kdiv);
> +		fvco = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv, prate);
> +		t->rate = (unsigned int)fvco;
> +		t->mdiv = mdiv;
> +		t->pdiv = pdiv;
> +		t->sdiv = sdiv;
> +		t->kdiv = kdiv;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Then try if we can get the desired rate from one of the static entries */
> +	tt = imx_get_pll_settings(pll, rate);

Shouldn't we try this one first? Maybe we don't need to compute kdiv at
all.

> +	if (tt) {
> +		pr_debug("%s: in=%ld, want=%ld, Using PLL setting from table\n",
> +			 clk_hw_get_name(&pll->hw), prate, rate);
> +		t->rate = tt->rate;
> +		t->mdiv = tt->mdiv;
> +		t->pdiv = tt->pdiv;
> +		t->sdiv = tt->sdiv;
> +		t->kdiv = tt->kdiv;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Finally calculate best values */
> +	for (pdiv = 1; pdiv <= 7; pdiv++) {
> +		for (sdiv = 0; sdiv <= 6; sdiv++) {
> +			/* calc mdiv = round(rate * pdiv * 2^sdiv) / prate) */
> +			mdiv = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * (pdiv << sdiv), prate);
> +			mdiv = clamp(mdiv, 64, 1023);
> +
> +			kdiv = pll1443x_calc_kdiv(mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, rate, prate);
> +			fvco = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv, prate);
> +
> +			/* best match */
> +			dist = abs((long)rate - (long)fvco);
> +			if (dist < best) {
> +				best = dist;
> +				t->rate = (unsigned int)fvco;
> +				t->mdiv = mdiv;
> +				t->pdiv = pdiv;
> +				t->sdiv = sdiv;
> +				t->kdiv = kdiv;
> +
> +				if (!dist)
> +					goto found;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +found:
> +	pr_debug("%s: in=%ld, want=%ld got=%d (pdiv=%d sdiv=%d mdiv=%d kdiv=%d)\n",
> +		 clk_hw_get_name(&pll->hw), prate, rate, t->rate, t->pdiv, t->sdiv,
> +		 t->mdiv, t->kdiv);
> +}
> +
> +static long clk_pll1416x_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			unsigned long *prate)
>  {
>  	struct clk_pll14xx *pll = to_clk_pll14xx(hw);
> @@ -129,6 +230,17 @@ static long clk_pll14xx_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  	return rate_table[pll->rate_count - 1].rate;
>  }
>  
> +static long clk_pll1443x_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +			unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> +	struct clk_pll14xx *pll = to_clk_pll14xx(hw);
> +	struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table t;
> +
> +	imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(pll, rate, *prate, &t);
> +
> +	return t.rate;
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned long clk_pll14xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  						  unsigned long parent_rate)
>  {
> @@ -239,25 +351,21 @@ static int clk_pll1443x_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
>  				 unsigned long prate)
>  {
>  	struct clk_pll14xx *pll = to_clk_pll14xx(hw);
> -	const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *rate;
> +	struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table rate;
>  	u32 gnrl_ctl, div_ctl0;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	rate = imx_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
> -	if (!rate) {
> -		pr_err("%s: Invalid rate : %lu for pll clk %s\n", __func__,
> -			drate, clk_hw_get_name(hw));
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(pll, drate, prate, &rate);
>  
>  	div_ctl0 = readl_relaxed(pll->base + DIV_CTL0);
>  
> -	if (!clk_pll14xx_mp_change(rate, div_ctl0)) {
> +	if (!clk_pll14xx_mp_change(&rate, div_ctl0)) {
> +		/* only sdiv and/or kdiv changed - no need to RESET PLL */
>  		div_ctl0 &= ~SDIV_MASK;
> -		div_ctl0 |= FIELD_PREP(SDIV_MASK, rate->sdiv);
> +		div_ctl0 |= FIELD_PREP(SDIV_MASK, rate.sdiv);
>  		writel_relaxed(div_ctl0, pll->base + DIV_CTL0);
>  
> -		writel_relaxed(FIELD_PREP(KDIV_MASK, rate->kdiv),
> +		writel_relaxed(FIELD_PREP(KDIV_MASK, rate.kdiv),
>  			       pll->base + DIV_CTL1);
>  
>  		return 0;
> @@ -272,11 +380,12 @@ static int clk_pll1443x_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
>  	gnrl_ctl |= BYPASS_MASK;
>  	writel_relaxed(gnrl_ctl, pll->base + GNRL_CTL);
>  
> -	div_ctl0 = FIELD_PREP(MDIV_MASK, rate->mdiv) |
> -		   FIELD_PREP(PDIV_MASK, rate->pdiv) |
> -		   FIELD_PREP(SDIV_MASK, rate->sdiv);
> +	div_ctl0 = FIELD_PREP(MDIV_MASK, rate.mdiv) |
> +		   FIELD_PREP(PDIV_MASK, rate.pdiv) |
> +		   FIELD_PREP(SDIV_MASK, rate.sdiv);
>  	writel_relaxed(div_ctl0, pll->base + DIV_CTL0);
> -	writel_relaxed(FIELD_PREP(KDIV_MASK, rate->kdiv), pll->base + DIV_CTL1);
> +
> +	writel_relaxed(FIELD_PREP(KDIV_MASK, rate.kdiv), pll->base + DIV_CTL1);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * According to SPEC, t3 - t2 need to be greater than
> @@ -359,7 +468,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_pll1416x_ops = {
>  	.unprepare	= clk_pll14xx_unprepare,
>  	.is_prepared	= clk_pll14xx_is_prepared,
>  	.recalc_rate	= clk_pll14xx_recalc_rate,
> -	.round_rate	= clk_pll14xx_round_rate,
> +	.round_rate	= clk_pll1416x_round_rate,
>  	.set_rate	= clk_pll1416x_set_rate,
>  };
>  
> @@ -372,7 +481,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_pll1443x_ops = {
>  	.unprepare	= clk_pll14xx_unprepare,
>  	.is_prepared	= clk_pll14xx_is_prepared,
>  	.recalc_rate	= clk_pll14xx_recalc_rate,
> -	.round_rate	= clk_pll14xx_round_rate,
> +	.round_rate	= clk_pll1443x_round_rate,
>  	.set_rate	= clk_pll1443x_set_rate,
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25  8:29 [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: i.MX: PLL14xx: Support dynamic rates Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Use register defines consistently Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Drop wrong shifting Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Use FIELD_GET/FIELD_PREP Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: consolidate rate calculation Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 13:24   ` Abel Vesa
2022-02-25  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: name variables after usage Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 13:25   ` Abel Vesa
2022-02-25  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: explicitly return lowest rate Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 13:26   ` Abel Vesa
2022-02-25  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Add pr_fmt Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 13:27   ` Abel Vesa
2022-02-25  8:29 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Support dynamic rates Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 14:13   ` Abel Vesa [this message]
2022-03-04  8:39     ` Abel Vesa
2022-03-04 12:44     ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yhjj8o3vEQy0qysO@abelvesa \
    --to=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
    --cc=adrian.alonso@nxp.com \
    --cc=bli@bang-olufsen.dk \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox