From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Adrian Alonso <adrian.alonso@nxp.com>,
Mads Bligaard Nielsen <bli@bang-olufsen.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Support dynamic rates
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:13:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yhjj8o3vEQy0qysO@abelvesa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220225082937.2746176-9-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On 22-02-25 09:29:37, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The pll1443x PLL so far only supports rates from a rate table passed
> during initialization. Calculating PLL settings dynamically helps audio
> applications to get their desired rates, so support for this is added
> in this patch.
>
> The strategy to get to the PLL setting for a rate is:
>
> - First try to only adjust kdiv which specifies the fractional part of the PLL.
> This setting can be changed without glitches on the output and is therefore
> preferred
> - When that isn't possible then the rate table is searched for suitable rates,
> so for standard rates the same settings are used as without this patch
> - As a last resort the best settings are calculated dynamically
>
> The code in this patch is based on patches from Adrian Alonso <adrian.alonso@nxp.com>
> and Mads Bligaard Nielsen <bli@bang-olufsen.dk>
Hmm, I wish this was also possible for SSCG plls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> index 646e0ce7d6242..eef0f3b693ed9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> #define PDIV_MASK GENMASK(9, 4)
> #define SDIV_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
> #define KDIV_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define KDIV_MIN SHRT_MIN
> +#define KDIV_MAX SHRT_MAX
>
> #define LOCK_TIMEOUT_US 10000
>
> @@ -113,7 +115,106 @@ static long pll14xx_calc_rate(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, int mdiv, int pdiv,
> return fvco;
> }
>
> -static long clk_pll14xx_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +static long pll1443x_calc_kdiv(int mdiv, int pdiv, int sdiv,
> + unsigned long rate, unsigned long prate)
> +{
> + long kdiv;
> +
> + /* calc kdiv = round(rate * pdiv * 65536 * 2^sdiv / prate) - (mdiv * 65536) */
> + kdiv = ((rate * ((pdiv * 65536) << sdiv) + prate / 2) / prate) - (mdiv * 65536);
> +
> + return clamp_t(short, kdiv, KDIV_MIN, KDIV_MAX);
> +}
> +
> +static void imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long prate, struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *t)
> +{
> + u32 pll_div_ctl0, pll_div_ctl1;
> + int mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv;
> + long fvco, rate_min, rate_max, dist, best = LONG_MAX;
> + const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *tt;
> +
> + /*
> + * Fractional PLL constrains:
> + *
> + * a) 6MHz <= prate <= 25MHz
> + * b) 1 <= p <= 63 (1 <= p <= 4 prate = 24MHz)
> + * c) 64 <= m <= 1023
> + * d) 0 <= s <= 6
> + * e) -32768 <= k <= 32767
> + *
> + * fvco = (m * 65536 + k) * prate / (p * 65536)
> + */
> +
> + pll_div_ctl0 = readl_relaxed(pll->base + DIV_CTL0);
> + mdiv = FIELD_GET(MDIV_MASK, pll_div_ctl0);
> + pdiv = FIELD_GET(PDIV_MASK, pll_div_ctl0);
> + sdiv = FIELD_GET(SDIV_MASK, pll_div_ctl0);
> + pll_div_ctl1 = readl_relaxed(pll->base + DIV_CTL1);
> +
> + /* First see if we can get the desired rate by only adjusting kdiv (glitch free) */
> + rate_min = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, KDIV_MIN, prate);
> + rate_max = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, KDIV_MAX, prate);
> +
> + if (rate >= rate_min && rate <= rate_max) {
> + kdiv = pll1443x_calc_kdiv(mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, rate, prate);
> + pr_debug("%s: in=%ld, want=%ld Only adjust kdiv %ld -> %d\n",
> + clk_hw_get_name(&pll->hw), prate, rate,
> + FIELD_GET(KDIV_MASK, pll_div_ctl1), kdiv);
> + fvco = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv, prate);
> + t->rate = (unsigned int)fvco;
> + t->mdiv = mdiv;
> + t->pdiv = pdiv;
> + t->sdiv = sdiv;
> + t->kdiv = kdiv;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Then try if we can get the desired rate from one of the static entries */
> + tt = imx_get_pll_settings(pll, rate);
Shouldn't we try this one first? Maybe we don't need to compute kdiv at
all.
> + if (tt) {
> + pr_debug("%s: in=%ld, want=%ld, Using PLL setting from table\n",
> + clk_hw_get_name(&pll->hw), prate, rate);
> + t->rate = tt->rate;
> + t->mdiv = tt->mdiv;
> + t->pdiv = tt->pdiv;
> + t->sdiv = tt->sdiv;
> + t->kdiv = tt->kdiv;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Finally calculate best values */
> + for (pdiv = 1; pdiv <= 7; pdiv++) {
> + for (sdiv = 0; sdiv <= 6; sdiv++) {
> + /* calc mdiv = round(rate * pdiv * 2^sdiv) / prate) */
> + mdiv = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * (pdiv << sdiv), prate);
> + mdiv = clamp(mdiv, 64, 1023);
> +
> + kdiv = pll1443x_calc_kdiv(mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, rate, prate);
> + fvco = pll14xx_calc_rate(pll, mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv, prate);
> +
> + /* best match */
> + dist = abs((long)rate - (long)fvco);
> + if (dist < best) {
> + best = dist;
> + t->rate = (unsigned int)fvco;
> + t->mdiv = mdiv;
> + t->pdiv = pdiv;
> + t->sdiv = sdiv;
> + t->kdiv = kdiv;
> +
> + if (!dist)
> + goto found;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +found:
> + pr_debug("%s: in=%ld, want=%ld got=%d (pdiv=%d sdiv=%d mdiv=%d kdiv=%d)\n",
> + clk_hw_get_name(&pll->hw), prate, rate, t->rate, t->pdiv, t->sdiv,
> + t->mdiv, t->kdiv);
> +}
> +
> +static long clk_pll1416x_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> unsigned long *prate)
> {
> struct clk_pll14xx *pll = to_clk_pll14xx(hw);
> @@ -129,6 +230,17 @@ static long clk_pll14xx_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> return rate_table[pll->rate_count - 1].rate;
> }
>
> +static long clk_pll1443x_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> + struct clk_pll14xx *pll = to_clk_pll14xx(hw);
> + struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table t;
> +
> + imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(pll, rate, *prate, &t);
> +
> + return t.rate;
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long clk_pll14xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> unsigned long parent_rate)
> {
> @@ -239,25 +351,21 @@ static int clk_pll1443x_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
> unsigned long prate)
> {
> struct clk_pll14xx *pll = to_clk_pll14xx(hw);
> - const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table *rate;
> + struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table rate;
> u32 gnrl_ctl, div_ctl0;
> int ret;
>
> - rate = imx_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
> - if (!rate) {
> - pr_err("%s: Invalid rate : %lu for pll clk %s\n", __func__,
> - drate, clk_hw_get_name(hw));
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(pll, drate, prate, &rate);
>
> div_ctl0 = readl_relaxed(pll->base + DIV_CTL0);
>
> - if (!clk_pll14xx_mp_change(rate, div_ctl0)) {
> + if (!clk_pll14xx_mp_change(&rate, div_ctl0)) {
> + /* only sdiv and/or kdiv changed - no need to RESET PLL */
> div_ctl0 &= ~SDIV_MASK;
> - div_ctl0 |= FIELD_PREP(SDIV_MASK, rate->sdiv);
> + div_ctl0 |= FIELD_PREP(SDIV_MASK, rate.sdiv);
> writel_relaxed(div_ctl0, pll->base + DIV_CTL0);
>
> - writel_relaxed(FIELD_PREP(KDIV_MASK, rate->kdiv),
> + writel_relaxed(FIELD_PREP(KDIV_MASK, rate.kdiv),
> pll->base + DIV_CTL1);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -272,11 +380,12 @@ static int clk_pll1443x_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
> gnrl_ctl |= BYPASS_MASK;
> writel_relaxed(gnrl_ctl, pll->base + GNRL_CTL);
>
> - div_ctl0 = FIELD_PREP(MDIV_MASK, rate->mdiv) |
> - FIELD_PREP(PDIV_MASK, rate->pdiv) |
> - FIELD_PREP(SDIV_MASK, rate->sdiv);
> + div_ctl0 = FIELD_PREP(MDIV_MASK, rate.mdiv) |
> + FIELD_PREP(PDIV_MASK, rate.pdiv) |
> + FIELD_PREP(SDIV_MASK, rate.sdiv);
> writel_relaxed(div_ctl0, pll->base + DIV_CTL0);
> - writel_relaxed(FIELD_PREP(KDIV_MASK, rate->kdiv), pll->base + DIV_CTL1);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(FIELD_PREP(KDIV_MASK, rate.kdiv), pll->base + DIV_CTL1);
>
> /*
> * According to SPEC, t3 - t2 need to be greater than
> @@ -359,7 +468,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_pll1416x_ops = {
> .unprepare = clk_pll14xx_unprepare,
> .is_prepared = clk_pll14xx_is_prepared,
> .recalc_rate = clk_pll14xx_recalc_rate,
> - .round_rate = clk_pll14xx_round_rate,
> + .round_rate = clk_pll1416x_round_rate,
> .set_rate = clk_pll1416x_set_rate,
> };
>
> @@ -372,7 +481,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_pll1443x_ops = {
> .unprepare = clk_pll14xx_unprepare,
> .is_prepared = clk_pll14xx_is_prepared,
> .recalc_rate = clk_pll14xx_recalc_rate,
> - .round_rate = clk_pll14xx_round_rate,
> + .round_rate = clk_pll1443x_round_rate,
> .set_rate = clk_pll1443x_set_rate,
> };
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-25 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 8:29 [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: i.MX: PLL14xx: Support dynamic rates Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Use register defines consistently Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Drop wrong shifting Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Use FIELD_GET/FIELD_PREP Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: consolidate rate calculation Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 13:24 ` Abel Vesa
2022-02-25 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: name variables after usage Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 13:25 ` Abel Vesa
2022-02-25 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: explicitly return lowest rate Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 13:26 ` Abel Vesa
2022-02-25 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Add pr_fmt Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 13:27 ` Abel Vesa
2022-02-25 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] clk: imx: pll14xx: Support dynamic rates Sascha Hauer
2022-02-25 14:13 ` Abel Vesa [this message]
2022-03-04 8:39 ` Abel Vesa
2022-03-04 12:44 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yhjj8o3vEQy0qysO@abelvesa \
--to=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
--cc=adrian.alonso@nxp.com \
--cc=bli@bang-olufsen.dk \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox