Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] interconnect: icc-clk: Add devm_icc_clk_register

[Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>]

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:48:08PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 13:40, Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 13:34, Varadarajan Narayanan
> > <quic_varada@quicinc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Wrap icc_clk_register to create devm_icc_clk_register to be
> > > able to release the resources properly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > v5: Introduced devm_icc_clk_register
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c   | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/interconnect-clk.h |  4 ++++
> > >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>
> Wait. Actually,
>
> Unreviewed-by: me
>
> Please return int from devm_icc_clk_register instead of returning the pointer.

Wouldn't returning int break the general assumption that
devm_foo(), returns the same type as foo(). For example
devm_clk_hw_get_clk and clk_hw_get_clk return struct clk *?

Thanks
Varada