* [PATCH] clk: mediatek: pllfh: Fix IO remapping leak in register_pllfhs error path
@ 2026-07-08 9:18 Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-08 16:50 ` Brian Masney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Louis-Alexis Eyraud @ 2026-07-08 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Brian Masney, Matthias Brugger,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Chen-Yu Tsai, Edward-JW Yang,
Johnson Wang
Cc: kernel, linux-clk, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek,
Louis-Alexis Eyraud
When mtk_clk_register_pllfhs function fails to register a PLL, it
unregisters all PLLs and cleans up itself in its error path before
returning, so the function callers don't need to do it.
But contrary to mtk_clk_unregister_pllfhs function, that does almost
the same sequence, it does not free the IO memory mapped on fhctl node,
leading to a leak.
Fix this leak by factorizing the cleanup sequence in a new private
function and use it both mtk_clk_register_pllfhs and
mtk_clk_unregister_pllfhs functions.
Also, change the loop index start value to avoid the -1 operation on
index at each loop.
Fixes: d7964de8a8ea ("clk: mediatek: Add new clock driver to handle FHCTL hardware")
Signed-off-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
---
This patch aims to fix a issue, detected by Sashiko
during another series review ([1]), regarding the use of
mtk_clk_register_pllfhs function.
The patch is based on linux-next tree (tag: next-20260707).
[1]: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701-mt8189-clocks-system-base-v1-0-2b048feea50a%40collabora.com?part=6
---
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c
index aa95cd9197b3..7463aa35d7e3 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c
@@ -197,6 +197,43 @@ static void mtk_clk_unregister_pllfh(struct clk_hw *hw)
kfree(fh);
}
+static void mtk_clk_cleanup_pllfhs(const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
+ struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfhs, int num_fhs,
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data)
+{
+ void __iomem *base = NULL, *fhctl_base = NULL;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = num_plls - 1; i > 0; i--) {
+ const struct mtk_pll_data *pll = &plls[i];
+ struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfh;
+ bool use_fhctl;
+
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->hws[pll->id]))
+ continue;
+
+ pllfh = get_pllfh_by_id(pllfhs, num_fhs, pll->id);
+ use_fhctl = fhctl_is_supported_and_enabled(pllfh);
+
+ if (use_fhctl) {
+ fhctl_base = pllfh->state.base;
+ mtk_clk_unregister_pllfh(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
+ } else {
+ base = mtk_clk_pll_get_base(clk_data->hws[pll->id],
+ pll);
+ mtk_clk_unregister_pll(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
+ }
+
+ clk_data->hws[pll->id] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+ }
+
+ if (fhctl_base)
+ iounmap(fhctl_base);
+
+ iounmap(base);
+}
+
+
int mtk_clk_register_pllfhs(struct device *dev,
const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfhs, int num_fhs,
@@ -238,24 +275,7 @@ int mtk_clk_register_pllfhs(struct device *dev,
return 0;
err:
- while (--i >= 0) {
- const struct mtk_pll_data *pll = &plls[i];
- struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfh;
- bool use_fhctl;
-
- pllfh = get_pllfh_by_id(pllfhs, num_fhs, pll->id);
- use_fhctl = fhctl_is_supported_and_enabled(pllfh);
-
- if (use_fhctl)
- mtk_clk_unregister_pllfh(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
- else
- mtk_clk_unregister_pll(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
-
- clk_data->hws[pll->id] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- }
-
- iounmap(base);
-
+ mtk_clk_cleanup_pllfhs(plls, i, pllfhs, num_fhs, clk_data);
return PTR_ERR(hw);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_clk_register_pllfhs);
@@ -264,38 +284,9 @@ void mtk_clk_unregister_pllfhs(const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfhs, int num_fhs,
struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data)
{
- void __iomem *base = NULL, *fhctl_base = NULL;
- int i;
-
if (!clk_data)
return;
- for (i = num_plls; i > 0; i--) {
- const struct mtk_pll_data *pll = &plls[i - 1];
- struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfh;
- bool use_fhctl;
-
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->hws[pll->id]))
- continue;
-
- pllfh = get_pllfh_by_id(pllfhs, num_fhs, pll->id);
- use_fhctl = fhctl_is_supported_and_enabled(pllfh);
-
- if (use_fhctl) {
- fhctl_base = pllfh->state.base;
- mtk_clk_unregister_pllfh(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
- } else {
- base = mtk_clk_pll_get_base(clk_data->hws[pll->id],
- pll);
- mtk_clk_unregister_pll(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
- }
-
- clk_data->hws[pll->id] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
- }
-
- if (fhctl_base)
- iounmap(fhctl_base);
-
- iounmap(base);
+ mtk_clk_cleanup_pllfhs(plls, num_plls, pllfhs, num_fhs, clk_data);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_clk_unregister_pllfhs);
---
base-commit: b3a87fbe738f19cbe19411cf749f3d8c09c04de4
change-id: 20260708-clk-mediatek-pllfh-fix-7e9ca35989e2
Best regards,
--
Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: pllfh: Fix IO remapping leak in register_pllfhs error path
2026-07-08 9:18 [PATCH] clk: mediatek: pllfh: Fix IO remapping leak in register_pllfhs error path Louis-Alexis Eyraud
@ 2026-07-08 16:50 ` Brian Masney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brian Masney @ 2026-07-08 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Louis-Alexis Eyraud
Cc: Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Matthias Brugger,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Chen-Yu Tsai, Edward-JW Yang,
Johnson Wang, kernel, linux-clk, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-mediatek
Hi Louis-Alexis,
Thanks for the patch.
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:18:59AM +0200, Louis-Alexis Eyraud wrote:
> When mtk_clk_register_pllfhs function fails to register a PLL, it
> unregisters all PLLs and cleans up itself in its error path before
> returning, so the function callers don't need to do it.
>
> But contrary to mtk_clk_unregister_pllfhs function, that does almost
> the same sequence, it does not free the IO memory mapped on fhctl node,
> leading to a leak.
>
> Fix this leak by factorizing the cleanup sequence in a new private
> function and use it both mtk_clk_register_pllfhs and
> mtk_clk_unregister_pllfhs functions.
>
> Also, change the loop index start value to avoid the -1 operation on
> index at each loop.
>
> Fixes: d7964de8a8ea ("clk: mediatek: Add new clock driver to handle FHCTL hardware")
> Signed-off-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
> ---
> This patch aims to fix a issue, detected by Sashiko
> during another series review ([1]), regarding the use of
> mtk_clk_register_pllfhs function.
>
> The patch is based on linux-next tree (tag: next-20260707).
>
> [1]: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701-mt8189-clocks-system-base-v1-0-2b048feea50a%40collabora.com?part=6
> ---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c
> index aa95cd9197b3..7463aa35d7e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pllfh.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,43 @@ static void mtk_clk_unregister_pllfh(struct clk_hw *hw)
> kfree(fh);
> }
>
> +static void mtk_clk_cleanup_pllfhs(const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
> + struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfhs, int num_fhs,
> + struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = NULL, *fhctl_base = NULL;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = num_plls - 1; i > 0; i--) {
It looks like this should be i >= 0
> + const struct mtk_pll_data *pll = &plls[i];
> + struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfh;
> + bool use_fhctl;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->hws[pll->id]))
> + continue;
> +
> + pllfh = get_pllfh_by_id(pllfhs, num_fhs, pll->id);
> + use_fhctl = fhctl_is_supported_and_enabled(pllfh);
> +
> + if (use_fhctl) {
> + fhctl_base = pllfh->state.base;
> + mtk_clk_unregister_pllfh(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
> + } else {
> + base = mtk_clk_pll_get_base(clk_data->hws[pll->id],
> + pll);
> + mtk_clk_unregister_pll(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
> + }
> +
> + clk_data->hws[pll->id] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> + }
> +
> + if (fhctl_base)
> + iounmap(fhctl_base);
> +
> + iounmap(base);
When use_fhctl is enabled for all PLLs, base will be NULL.
Brian
> +}
> +
> +
> int mtk_clk_register_pllfhs(struct device *dev,
> const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
> struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfhs, int num_fhs,
> @@ -238,24 +275,7 @@ int mtk_clk_register_pllfhs(struct device *dev,
> return 0;
>
> err:
> - while (--i >= 0) {
> - const struct mtk_pll_data *pll = &plls[i];
> - struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfh;
> - bool use_fhctl;
> -
> - pllfh = get_pllfh_by_id(pllfhs, num_fhs, pll->id);
> - use_fhctl = fhctl_is_supported_and_enabled(pllfh);
> -
> - if (use_fhctl)
> - mtk_clk_unregister_pllfh(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
> - else
> - mtk_clk_unregister_pll(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
> -
> - clk_data->hws[pll->id] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> - }
> -
> - iounmap(base);
> -
> + mtk_clk_cleanup_pllfhs(plls, i, pllfhs, num_fhs, clk_data);
> return PTR_ERR(hw);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_clk_register_pllfhs);
> @@ -264,38 +284,9 @@ void mtk_clk_unregister_pllfhs(const struct mtk_pll_data *plls, int num_plls,
> struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfhs, int num_fhs,
> struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data)
> {
> - void __iomem *base = NULL, *fhctl_base = NULL;
> - int i;
> -
> if (!clk_data)
> return;
>
> - for (i = num_plls; i > 0; i--) {
> - const struct mtk_pll_data *pll = &plls[i - 1];
> - struct mtk_pllfh_data *pllfh;
> - bool use_fhctl;
> -
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->hws[pll->id]))
> - continue;
> -
> - pllfh = get_pllfh_by_id(pllfhs, num_fhs, pll->id);
> - use_fhctl = fhctl_is_supported_and_enabled(pllfh);
> -
> - if (use_fhctl) {
> - fhctl_base = pllfh->state.base;
> - mtk_clk_unregister_pllfh(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
> - } else {
> - base = mtk_clk_pll_get_base(clk_data->hws[pll->id],
> - pll);
> - mtk_clk_unregister_pll(clk_data->hws[pll->id]);
> - }
> -
> - clk_data->hws[pll->id] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> - }
> -
> - if (fhctl_base)
> - iounmap(fhctl_base);
> -
> - iounmap(base);
> + mtk_clk_cleanup_pllfhs(plls, num_plls, pllfhs, num_fhs, clk_data);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_clk_unregister_pllfhs);
>
> ---
> base-commit: b3a87fbe738f19cbe19411cf749f3d8c09c04de4
> change-id: 20260708-clk-mediatek-pllfh-fix-7e9ca35989e2
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-08 16:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-08 9:18 [PATCH] clk: mediatek: pllfh: Fix IO remapping leak in register_pllfhs error path Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-07-08 16:50 ` Brian Masney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox