[PATCH] Drop Michael Turquette's clk maintainer entry

[PATCH] Drop Michael Turquette's clk maintainer entry

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Mike wasn't publically active for the clk subsystem since years. Stop
pretending that there is a maintainer team caring for clk.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
---
Hello,

I recently[1] wondered about the state of clk maintenance. I think the
part of my doubts implemented here is not disputed.

Best regards
Uwe

 CREDITS     | 4 ++++
 MAINTAINERS | 1 -
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/CREDITS b/CREDITS
index 0806ab21c1d3..acab439013cf 100644
--- a/CREDITS
+++ b/CREDITS
@@ -4107,6 +4107,10 @@ S: 4226 Landgreen Street
 S: Rockville, Maryland 20853
 S: USA
 
+N: Michael Turquette
+E: mturquette@baylibre.com
+D: common clk maintenance
+
 N: Stephen Tweedie
 E: sct@redhat.com
 P: 1024/E7A417AD E2 FE A4 20 34 EC ED FC 7D 7E 67 8D E0 31 D1 69
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index e95fc6f2ddc6..686431042bfa 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -6484,7 +6484,6 @@ F:	include/linux/comedi/
 F:	include/uapi/linux/comedi.h
 
 COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK
-M:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
 M:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
 R:	Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
 L:	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org

base-commit: 3652b49adac266a3d27cb41cdfdb7d8790fc3633
-- 
2.55.0.11.g153666a7d9bb

Re: [PATCH] Drop Michael Turquette's clk maintainer entry

[Michael Turquette]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 7:16 AM Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Mike wasn't publically active for the clk subsystem since years. Stop
> pretending that there is a maintainer team caring for clk.

I was hoping to send this patch myself, and to recommend a couple of
folks for promotion to the clk subsystem. Alas, you beat me to the
first half of my plan.

>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>

Best regards,
Mike

> ---
> Hello,
>
> I recently[1] wondered about the state of clk maintenance. I think the
> part of my doubts implemented here is not disputed.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
>  CREDITS     | 4 ++++
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/CREDITS b/CREDITS
> index 0806ab21c1d3..acab439013cf 100644
> --- a/CREDITS
> +++ b/CREDITS
> @@ -4107,6 +4107,10 @@ S: 4226 Landgreen Street
>  S: Rockville, Maryland 20853
>  S: USA
>
> +N: Michael Turquette
> +E: mturquette@baylibre.com
> +D: common clk maintenance
> +
>  N: Stephen Tweedie
>  E: sct@redhat.com
>  P: 1024/E7A417AD E2 FE A4 20 34 EC ED FC 7D 7E 67 8D E0 31 D1 69
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index e95fc6f2ddc6..686431042bfa 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -6484,7 +6484,6 @@ F:        include/linux/comedi/
>  F:     include/uapi/linux/comedi.h
>
>  COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK
> -M:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
>  M:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
>  R:     Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
>  L:     linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
>
> base-commit: 3652b49adac266a3d27cb41cdfdb7d8790fc3633
> --
> 2.55.0.11.g153666a7d9bb
>

Re: [PATCH] Drop Michael Turquette's clk maintainer entry

[Brian Masney]

On Sun, Aug 02, 2026 at 06:34:06PM -0500, Michael Turquette wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 7:16 AM Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Mike wasn't publically active for the clk subsystem since years. Stop
> > pretending that there is a maintainer team caring for clk.
> 
> I was hoping to send this patch myself, and to recommend a couple of
> folks for promotion to the clk subsystem. Alas, you beat me to the
> first half of my plan.
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>

Thanks Mike for everything you have done over the years with linux-clk.

I posted this patch to make me co-maintainer to help out Stephen:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20260804-clk-masney-maintainer-v1-1-de593189a9a1@redhat.com/T/#u

To help make this subsystem more sustainable from a maintenance
standpoint, I propose:

- To push more vendors to participate in meaningful reviews, and send in pulls.
  A recent example of where I did that is with Mediatek:
  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/amuWdRD-TBQtFT_4@redhat.com/

- Try to find more people to help with the subsystem as a whole so that
  this all isn't on just one person.

Brian