From: "Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>,
Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>,
Dom Cobley <popcornmix@gmail.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
kernel-dev@igalia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: bcm: rpi: Turn firmware clock on/off when preparing/unpreparing
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 17:15:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b19643a7-33b1-4b75-83ec-6027ed69d4c0@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <673f3f05-53f1-4eb4-ae65-a3cd9ccbd1bf@gmx.net>
Hi Stefan,
On 28/07/25 13:33, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Maíra,
>
> thanks for working on this.
>
> Am 28.07.25 um 14:35 schrieb Maíra Canal:
>> Currently, when we prepare or unprepare RPi's clocks, we don't actually
>> enable/disable the firmware clock. This means that
>> `clk_disable_unprepare()` doesn't actually change the clock state at
>> all, nor does it lowers the clock rate.
>>
>> From the Mailbox Property Interface documentation [1], we can see that
>> we should use `RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_CLOCK_STATE` to set the clock state
>> off/on. Therefore, use `RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_CLOCK_STATE` to create a
>> prepare and an unprepare hook for RPi's firmware clock.
>>
>> As now the clocks are actually turned off, some of them are now marked
>> with CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED or CLK_IS_CRITICAL, as those are required since
>> early boot or are required during reboot.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/wiki/Mailbox-property-
>> interface [1]
>> Fixes: 93d2725affd6 ("clk: bcm: rpi: Discover the firmware clocks")
> could you please explain from user perspective, which issue is fixed by
> this patch?
I was about to talk about the power savings benefits for the user.
However, as I type, I notice that such a thing doesn't justify a
"Fixes:" tag. I'll drop it.
Thanks for your review, I'll address all the comments.
Best Regards,
- Maíra
>
> Why does this needs to be backported?
>> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mcanal@igalia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-
>> raspberrypi.c
>> index
>> 8e4fde03ed232b464165f524d27744b4ced93a60..a2bd5040283a2f456760bd685e696b423985cac0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
>> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct raspberrypi_clk_variant {
>> char *clkdev;
>> unsigned long min_rate;
>> bool minimize;
>> + u32 flags;
>> };
>> static struct raspberrypi_clk_variant
>> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ raspberrypi_clk_variants[RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID] = {
>> [RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID] = {
>> .export = true,
>> .clkdev = "cpu0",
>> + .flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>> },
>> [RPI_FIRMWARE_CORE_CLK_ID] = {
>> .export = true,
>> @@ -90,6 +92,7 @@ raspberrypi_clk_variants[RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID] = {
>> * always use the minimum the drivers will let us.
>> */
>> .minimize = true,
>> + .flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>> },
>> [RPI_FIRMWARE_M2MC_CLK_ID] = {
>> .export = true,
>> @@ -115,6 +118,7 @@ raspberrypi_clk_variants[RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID] = {
>> * drivers will let us.
>> */
>> .minimize = true,
>> + .flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>> },
>> [RPI_FIRMWARE_V3D_CLK_ID] = {
>> .export = true,
>> @@ -127,6 +131,7 @@ raspberrypi_clk_variants[RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID] = {
>> [RPI_FIRMWARE_HEVC_CLK_ID] = {
>> .export = true,
>> .minimize = true,
>> + .flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
>> },
>> [RPI_FIRMWARE_ISP_CLK_ID] = {
>> .export = true,
>> @@ -135,6 +140,7 @@ raspberrypi_clk_variants[RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID] = {
>> [RPI_FIRMWARE_PIXEL_BVB_CLK_ID] = {
>> .export = true,
>> .minimize = true,
>> + .flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
>> },
>> [RPI_FIRMWARE_VEC_CLK_ID] = {
>> .export = true,
>> @@ -259,7 +265,40 @@ static int
>> raspberrypi_fw_dumb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +static int raspberrypi_fw_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + const struct raspberrypi_clk_data *data = clk_hw_to_data(hw);
>> + struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi = data->rpi;
>> + u32 state = RPI_FIRMWARE_STATE_ENABLE_BIT;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = raspberrypi_clock_property(rpi->firmware, data,
>> + RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_CLOCK_STATE, &state);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to set clock %d state to on: %d",
>> + data->id, ret);
> I suggest to use dev_err_ratelimited for prepare/unprepare, otherwise
> this could spam the kernel log.
>
> Furthermore i wouldn't recommend to log some magic clock id. How about
> using clk_hw_get_name(hw) instead?
>
> Don't we need a newline character at the end?
>
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void raspberrypi_fw_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + const struct raspberrypi_clk_data *data = clk_hw_to_data(hw);
>> + struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi = data->rpi;
>> + u32 state = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = raspberrypi_clock_property(rpi->firmware, data,
>> + RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_CLOCK_STATE, &state);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to set clock %d state to off: %d",
>> + data->id, ret);
> see above
>
> Best regards
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> static const struct clk_ops raspberrypi_firmware_clk_ops = {
>> + .prepare = raspberrypi_fw_prepare,
>> + .unprepare = raspberrypi_fw_unprepare,
>> .is_prepared = raspberrypi_fw_is_prepared,
>> .recalc_rate = raspberrypi_fw_get_rate,
>> .determine_rate = raspberrypi_fw_dumb_determine_rate,
>> @@ -289,7 +328,7 @@ static struct clk_hw
>> *raspberrypi_clk_register(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi,
>> if (!init.name)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> init.ops = &raspberrypi_firmware_clk_ops;
>> - init.flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE;
>> + init.flags = variant->flags | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE;
>> data->hw.init = &init;
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-28 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-28 12:35 [PATCH 0/3] Power Management for Raspberry Pi V3D GPU Maíra Canal
2025-07-28 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: bcm: rpi: Turn firmware clock on/off when preparing/unpreparing Maíra Canal
2025-07-28 16:33 ` Stefan Wahren
2025-07-28 20:15 ` Maíra Canal [this message]
2025-07-29 7:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-07-29 11:53 ` Maíra Canal
2025-07-29 12:14 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-07-29 16:19 ` Maíra Canal
2025-07-30 0:33 ` Maíra Canal
2025-07-30 15:13 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-07-28 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/v3d: Allocate all resources before enabling the clock Maíra Canal
2025-07-28 14:31 ` Philipp Zabel
2025-07-28 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/v3d: Introduce Runtime Power Management Maíra Canal
2025-07-28 21:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] Power Management for Raspberry Pi V3D GPU Stefan Wahren
2025-07-29 0:30 ` Maíra Canal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b19643a7-33b1-4b75-83ec-6027ed69d4c0@igalia.com \
--to=mcanal@igalia.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=itoral@igalia.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=mwen@igalia.com \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=popcornmix@gmail.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox