From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] coco/tdx-host: Initialize trusted DMA on all capable IOMMUs
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 11:58:43 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261016145843.GF14213@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ca5f1c4-4c3c-47f1-b79c-c1fe06b20ee4@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 03:03:23PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 10/16/2026 1:37 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 04:31:31PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> >
> > > An alternative could be, bringing up one IOMMU when an associated
> > > device requests link encryption. Then a no-tdx-support iommu fails the
> > > encryption request naturally.
> > That is what ARM is planning to do. I think it is reasonable to
> > trigger creation of the secure iommu when the TSM is connected to TDX.
> >
> > Fail connect if the iommu could not be created.
>
> Yes, agreed. The Intel iommu driver could use per-device interfaces,
> just as ARM is planning. There are some differences, though.
>
> ARM's interaction with the iommu driver in viommu_init() appears to
> consist of two steps:
>
> - arm_smmu_get_realm_params(dev, ¶ms): get and validate the
> physical iommu information from the arm-smmu-v3 driver;
> - cca_psmmu_get(¶ms): activate the physical smmu for Realm use.
Okay, I haven't looked, not sure what is in cca_psmmu_get() yet
> So the Intel iommu driver will probably end up with interfaces like:
>
> - dmar_tdxcs_iommu_init(struct device *dev, ...);
> - dmar_tdxcs_iommu_release(struct device *dev, ...);
>
> These would be called from the connect and disconnect callbacks of
> the TDX link ops:
It seems OK
It sounds like you will have a one time init of the secure iommu at
the time the first PCI device wants to use the TSM? It seems like no
problem.
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 1:07 [PATCH v2 0/4] coco/tdx-host: Introduce trusted DMA initialization support Lu Baolu
2026-10-15 1:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for IOMMU setup/clear Lu Baolu
2026-10-15 6:34 ` Xu Yilun
2026-10-15 1:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/virt/tdx: Read global metadata for trusted IOMMU Lu Baolu
2026-10-15 6:47 ` Xu Yilun
2026-10-16 7:59 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-10-15 1:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Add an API for tdx-host when enabling trusted DMA Lu Baolu
2026-10-15 1:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] coco/tdx-host: Initialize trusted DMA on all capable IOMMUs Lu Baolu
2026-10-15 8:31 ` Xu Yilun
2026-10-15 17:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-16 7:03 ` Baolu Lu
2026-10-16 7:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-10-16 14:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-16 14:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261016145843.GF14213@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox