From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<seanjc@google.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<aik@amd.com>, <Michael.Roth@amd.com>, <Tycho.Andersen@amd.com>,
<Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>, <ackerleytng@google.com>,
<jackyli@google.com>, <pgonda@google.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
<jacobhxu@google.com>, <xin@zytor.com>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<dyoung@redhat.com>, <nikunj@amd.com>, <john.allen@amd.com>,
<darwi@linutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:27:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2696f0a9-d2a3-41e8-91be-6f00a20d5f27@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a183dfc-91fa-4a08-9168-8ea0e53f708c@amd.com>
Hello Ashish,
On 7/21/2026 7:56 PM, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> That's why v7 moved to a runtime check. In v11 (as i mentioned) this will be a small local helper, it will also handles two things
> the cap-clear can't:
> - a contiguous (non-segmented) RMP, where RMPOPT isn't usable even with X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT set.
> - SNP being disabled at runtime (CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP).
>
> static bool rmpopt_capable(void)
> {
> return cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT) &&
> cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP) &&
CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP is set from bsp_determine_snp() ...
> (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED) &&
... and that already checks snp_probe_rmptable_info() ...
> rmp_segment_table;
.. and if iommu_snp_enable() fails snp_rmptable_init(), we clear
CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP.
So, the way I see it, CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP being set means we have
already tried provisioning RMP table.
I'm assuming all platforms that have X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT will all have
segmented RMP. If not, you can just clear X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT in
snp_rmptable_init() no?
We can never reach functions that need rmpopt_capable() without
first checking CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 18:08 [PATCH v10 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:09 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-07-20 21:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-30 18:10 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
2026-07-20 22:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-20 22:38 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-21 1:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-21 14:26 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-21 14:57 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-07-21 20:46 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-22 2:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-21 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
2026-07-01 9:40 ` Jethro Beekman
2026-07-01 16:39 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-01 21:08 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-01 21:25 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-06 12:02 ` Jethro Beekman
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
2026-07-21 15:06 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-06-30 18:11 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-06-30 18:12 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
2026-07-20 20:17 ` [PATCH v10 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-20 20:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-20 20:39 ` Kalra, Ashish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2696f0a9-d2a3-41e8-91be-6f00a20d5f27@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=Michael.Roth@amd.com \
--cc=Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com \
--cc=Tycho.Andersen@amd.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackyli@google.com \
--cc=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox