Linux Confidential Computing Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 10/44] arm64: RMI: Add support for SRO
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 15:35:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <864ik0x22q.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513131757.116630-11-steven.price@arm.com>

On Wed, 13 May 2026 14:17:18 +0100,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> RMM v2.0 introduces the concept of "Stateful RMI Operations" (SRO). This
> means that an SMC can return with an operation still in progress. The
> host is excepted to continue the operation until is reaches a conclusion
> (either success or failure). During this process the RMM can request
> additional memory ('donate') or hand memory back to the host
> ('reclaim'). The host can request an in progress operation is cancelled,
> but still continue the operation until it has completed (otherwise the
> incomplete operation may cause future RMM operations to fail).
> 
> The SRO is tracked using a struct rmi_sro_state object which keeps track
> of any memory which has been allocated but not yet consumed by the RMM
> or reclaimed from the RMM. This allows the memory to be reused in a
> future request within the same operation. It will also permit an
> operation to be done in a context where memory allocation may be
> difficult (e.g. atomic context) with the option to abort the operation
> and retry the memory allocation outside of the atomic context. The
> memory stored in the struct rmi_sro_state object can then be reused on
> the subsequent attempt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
> v14:
>  * SRO support has improved although is still not fully complete. The
>    infrastructure has been moved out of KVM.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c           | 359 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
> index eb213c8e6f26..1a7b0c8f1e38 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct rmi_sro_state {
>  
>  int rmi_delegate_range(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long size);
>  int rmi_undelegate_range(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long size);
> +int free_delegated_page(phys_addr_t phys);
>  
>  static inline int rmi_delegate_page(phys_addr_t phys)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c
> index 08cef54acadb..a8107ca9bb6d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/rmi.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,365 @@ int rmi_undelegate_range(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long size)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long donate_req_to_size(unsigned long donatereq)
> +{
> +	unsigned long unit_size = RMI_DONATE_SIZE(donatereq);
> +
> +	switch (unit_size) {
> +	case 0:
> +		return PAGE_SIZE;
> +	case 1:
> +		return PMD_SIZE;
> +	case 2:
> +		return PUD_SIZE;
> +	case 3:
> +		return P4D_SIZE;

How does this work when we have folded levels? If this is supposed to
be the architected size, then it should actively express that:

	return BIT(unit_size * (PAGE_SHIFT - 3) + PAGE_SHIFT);

> +	}
> +	unreachable();
> +}
> +
> +static void rmi_smccc_invoke(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *regs_in,
> +			     struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *regs_out)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs = *regs_in;
> +	unsigned long status;
> +
> +	do {
> +		arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&regs, regs_out);
> +		status = RMI_RETURN_STATUS(regs_out->a0);
> +	} while (status == RMI_BUSY || status == RMI_BLOCKED);
> +}
> +
> +int free_delegated_page(phys_addr_t phys)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON(rmi_undelegate_page(phys))) {

Please drop this WARN_ON(). Or at least make it ONCE. Everywhere.

> +		/* Undelegate failed: leak the page */
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	free_page((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(phys));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rmi_sro_ensure_capacity(struct rmi_sro_state *sro,
> +				   unsigned long count)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sro->addr_count > RMI_MAX_ADDR_LIST))
> +		return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
> +	if (count > RMI_MAX_ADDR_LIST - sro->addr_count)
> +		return -ENOSPC;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rmi_sro_donate_contig(struct rmi_sro_state *sro,
> +				 unsigned long sro_handle,
> +				 unsigned long donatereq,
> +				 struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *out_regs,
> +				 gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	unsigned long unit_size = RMI_DONATE_SIZE(donatereq);
> +	unsigned long unit_size_bytes = donate_req_to_size(donatereq);
> +	unsigned long count = RMI_DONATE_COUNT(donatereq);
> +	unsigned long state = RMI_DONATE_STATE(donatereq);
> +	unsigned long size = unit_size_bytes * count;
> +	unsigned long addr_range;
> +	int ret;
> +	void *virt;
> +	phys_addr_t phys;
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs = {
> +		SMC_RMI_OP_MEM_DONATE,
> +		sro_handle
> +	};
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < sro->addr_count; i++) {
> +		unsigned long entry = sro->addr_list[i];
> +
> +		if (RMI_ADDR_RANGE_SIZE(entry) == unit_size &&
> +		    RMI_ADDR_RANGE_COUNT(entry) == count &&
> +		    RMI_ADDR_RANGE_STATE(entry) == state) {
> +			sro->addr_count--;
> +			swap(sro->addr_list[sro->addr_count],
> +			     sro->addr_list[i]);
> +
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = rmi_sro_ensure_capacity(sro, 1);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	virt = alloc_pages_exact(size, gfp);
> +	if (!virt)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	phys = virt_to_phys(virt);
> +
> +	if (state == RMI_OP_MEM_DELEGATED) {
> +		if (rmi_delegate_range(phys, size)) {
> +			free_pages_exact(virt, size);
> +			return -ENXIO;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	addr_range = phys & RMI_ADDR_RANGE_ADDR_MASK;
> +	FIELD_MODIFY(RMI_ADDR_RANGE_SIZE_MASK, &addr_range, unit_size);
> +	FIELD_MODIFY(RMI_ADDR_RANGE_COUNT_MASK, &addr_range, count);
> +	FIELD_MODIFY(RMI_ADDR_RANGE_STATE_MASK, &addr_range, state);
> +
> +	sro->addr_list[sro->addr_count] = addr_range;
> +

Shouldn't this be moved to a helper that ensures capacity, and returns
an error otherwise?

> +out:
> +	regs.a2 = virt_to_phys(&sro->addr_list[sro->addr_count]);
> +	regs.a3 = 1;

This could really do with context specific helpers that populate regs
based on a set of parameters. I have no idea what this 1 here is, and
the init is spread over too much code. Think of the children!

That's valid for the whole patch.

	M.
> +	rmi_smccc_invoke(&regs, out_regs);
> +
> +	unsigned long donated_granules = out_regs->a1;
> +	unsigned long donated_size = donated_granules << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	if (donated_granules == 0) {
> +		/* No pages used by the RMM */
> +		sro->addr_count++;
> +	} else if (donated_size < size) {
> +		phys = sro->addr_list[sro->addr_count] & RMI_ADDR_RANGE_ADDR_MASK;
> +
> +		/* Not all granules used by the RMM, free the remaining pages */
> +		for (long i = donated_size; i < size; i += PAGE_SIZE) {
> +			if (state == RMI_OP_MEM_DELEGATED)
> +				free_delegated_page(phys + i);
> +			else
> +				__free_page(phys_to_page(phys + i));
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rmi_sro_donate_noncontig(struct rmi_sro_state *sro,
> +				    unsigned long sro_handle,
> +				    unsigned long donatereq,
> +				    struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *out_regs,
> +				    gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	unsigned long unit_size = RMI_DONATE_SIZE(donatereq);
> +	unsigned long unit_size_bytes = donate_req_to_size(donatereq);
> +	unsigned long count = RMI_DONATE_COUNT(donatereq);
> +	unsigned long state = RMI_DONATE_STATE(donatereq);
> +	unsigned long found = 0;
> +	unsigned long addr_list_start = sro->addr_count;
> +	int ret;
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs = {
> +		SMC_RMI_OP_MEM_DONATE,
> +		sro_handle
> +	};
> +
> +	for (int i = 0; i < addr_list_start && found < count; i++) {
> +		unsigned long entry = sro->addr_list[i];
> +
> +		if (RMI_ADDR_RANGE_SIZE(entry) == unit_size &&
> +		    RMI_ADDR_RANGE_COUNT(entry) == 1 &&
> +		    RMI_ADDR_RANGE_STATE(entry) == state) {
> +			addr_list_start--;
> +			swap(sro->addr_list[addr_list_start],
> +			     sro->addr_list[i]);
> +			found++;
> +			i--;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = rmi_sro_ensure_capacity(sro, count - found);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	while (found < count) {
> +		unsigned long addr_range;
> +		void *virt = alloc_pages_exact(unit_size_bytes, gfp);
> +		phys_addr_t phys;
> +
> +		if (!virt)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		phys = virt_to_phys(virt);
> +
> +		if (state == RMI_OP_MEM_DELEGATED) {
> +			if (rmi_delegate_range(phys, unit_size_bytes)) {
> +				free_pages_exact(virt, unit_size_bytes);
> +				return -ENXIO;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		addr_range = phys & RMI_ADDR_RANGE_ADDR_MASK;
> +		FIELD_MODIFY(RMI_ADDR_RANGE_SIZE_MASK, &addr_range, unit_size);
> +		FIELD_MODIFY(RMI_ADDR_RANGE_COUNT_MASK, &addr_range, 1);
> +		FIELD_MODIFY(RMI_ADDR_RANGE_STATE_MASK, &addr_range, state);
> +
> +		sro->addr_list[sro->addr_count++] = addr_range;
> +		found++;
> +	}
> +
> +	regs.a2 = virt_to_phys(&sro->addr_list[addr_list_start]);
> +	regs.a3 = found;
> +	rmi_smccc_invoke(&regs, out_regs);
> +
> +	unsigned long donated_granules = out_regs->a1;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(donated_granules & ((unit_size_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT) - 1))) {
> +		/*
> +		 * FIXME: RMM has only consumed part of a huge page, this leaks
> +		 * the rest of the huge page
> +		 */
> +		donated_granules = ALIGN(donated_granules,
> +					 (unit_size_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT));
> +	}
> +	unsigned long donated_blocks = donated_granules / (unit_size_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(donated_blocks > found))
> +		donated_blocks = found;
> +
> +	unsigned long undonated_blocks = found - donated_blocks;
> +
> +	while (donated_blocks && undonated_blocks) {
> +		sro->addr_count--;
> +		swap(sro->addr_list[addr_list_start],
> +		     sro->addr_list[sro->addr_count]);
> +		addr_list_start++;
> +
> +		donated_blocks--;
> +		undonated_blocks--;
> +	}
> +	sro->addr_count -= donated_blocks;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rmi_sro_donate(struct rmi_sro_state *sro,
> +			  unsigned long sro_handle,
> +			  unsigned long donatereq,
> +			  struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *regs,
> +			  gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	unsigned long count = RMI_DONATE_COUNT(donatereq);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!count))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (RMI_DONATE_CONTIG(donatereq)) {
> +		return rmi_sro_donate_contig(sro, sro_handle, donatereq,
> +					     regs, gfp);
> +	} else {
> +		return rmi_sro_donate_noncontig(sro, sro_handle, donatereq,
> +						regs, gfp);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int rmi_sro_reclaim(struct rmi_sro_state *sro,
> +			   unsigned long sro_handle,
> +			   struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *out_regs)
> +{
> +	unsigned long capacity;
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = rmi_sro_ensure_capacity(sro, 1);
> +	if (ret)
> +		rmi_sro_free(sro);
> +
> +	capacity = RMI_MAX_ADDR_LIST - sro->addr_count;
> +
> +	regs = (struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs){
> +		SMC_RMI_OP_MEM_RECLAIM,
> +		sro_handle,
> +		virt_to_phys(&sro->addr_list[sro->addr_count]),
> +		capacity
> +	};
> +	rmi_smccc_invoke(&regs, out_regs);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(out_regs->a1 > capacity))
> +		out_regs->a1 = capacity;
> +
> +	sro->addr_count += out_regs->a1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void rmi_sro_free(struct rmi_sro_state *sro)
> +{
> +	for (int i = 0; i < sro->addr_count; i++) {
> +		unsigned long entry = sro->addr_list[i];
> +		unsigned long addr = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_ADDR(entry);
> +		unsigned long unit_size = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_SIZE(entry);
> +		unsigned long count = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_COUNT(entry);
> +		unsigned long state = RMI_ADDR_RANGE_STATE(entry);
> +		unsigned long size = donate_req_to_size(unit_size) * count;
> +
> +		if (state == RMI_OP_MEM_DELEGATED) {
> +			if (WARN_ON(rmi_undelegate_range(addr, size))) {
> +				/* Leak the pages */
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		free_pages_exact(phys_to_virt(addr), size);
> +	}
> +
> +	sro->addr_count = 0;
> +}
> +
> +unsigned long rmi_sro_execute(struct rmi_sro_state *sro, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	unsigned long sro_handle;
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs;
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *regs_in = &sro->regs;
> +
> +	rmi_smccc_invoke(regs_in, &regs);
> +
> +	sro_handle = regs.a1;
> +
> +	while (RMI_RETURN_STATUS(regs.a0) == RMI_INCOMPLETE) {
> +		bool can_cancel = RMI_RETURN_CAN_CANCEL(regs.a0);
> +		int ret;
> +
> +		switch (RMI_RETURN_MEMREQ(regs.a0)) {
> +		case RMI_OP_MEM_REQ_NONE:
> +			regs = (struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs){
> +				SMC_RMI_OP_CONTINUE, sro_handle, 0
> +			};
> +			rmi_smccc_invoke(&regs, &regs);
> +			break;
> +		case RMI_OP_MEM_REQ_DONATE:
> +			ret = rmi_sro_donate(sro, sro_handle, regs.a2, &regs,
> +					     gfp);
> +			break;
> +		case RMI_OP_MEM_REQ_RECLAIM:
> +			ret = rmi_sro_reclaim(sro, sro_handle, &regs);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			ret = WARN_ON(1);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (can_cancel) {
> +				/*
> +				 * FIXME: Handle cancelling properly!
> +				 *
> +				 * If the operation has failed due to memory
> +				 * allocation failure then the information on
> +				 * the memory allocation should be saved, so
> +				 * that the allocation can be repeated outside
> +				 * of any context which prevented the
> +				 * allocation.

Honestly, this is the sort of stuff that I'd expect to be solved
*before* posting this code. Since this is so central to the whole
memory management, it needs to be correct from day-1.

If you can't make it work in time, then tone the supported features
down. But FIXMEs and WARN_ONs are not the way to go.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-21 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13 13:17 [PATCH v14 00/44] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 01/44] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2026-05-21 10:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:11     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 02/44] kvm: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Steven Price
2026-05-21 10:26   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:11     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 03/44] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:15     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 04/44] arm64: RMI: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2026-05-18  7:08   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-20 16:01     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:50     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-21 15:33     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 05/44] arm64: RMI: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2026-05-19  5:35   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:21   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 06/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at init Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:39   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 15:49     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 13:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 07/44] arm64: RMI: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:51   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 13:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:53     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 08/44] arm64: RMI: Ensure that the RMM has GPT entries for memory Steven Price
2026-05-19  5:55   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21  0:58   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 13:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:39     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 09/44] arm64: RMI: Provide functions to delegate/undelegate ranges of memory Steven Price
2026-05-21 13:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 16:01     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 10/44] arm64: RMI: Add support for SRO Steven Price
2026-05-14  8:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-14  9:33     ` Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:02   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21  4:38   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 14:35   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 11/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at KVM init Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 12/44] arm64: RMI: Check for LPA2 support Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 13/44] arm64: RMI: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 14/44] arm64: RMI: Basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:31   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 15/44] kvm: arm64: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 16/44] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 17/44] arm64: RMI: RTT tear down Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:54   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 18/44] arm64: RMI: Activate realm on first VCPU run Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 19/44] arm64: RMI: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 20/44] arm64: RMI: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 21/44] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 22/44] arm64: RMI: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 23/44] arm64: RMI: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2026-05-19  9:40   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 24/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 25/44] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 26/44] arm64: RMI: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 27/44] arm64: RMI: Set RIPAS of initial memslots Steven Price
2026-05-19 10:02   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-19 10:13     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-19 12:55       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-19 13:06         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 28/44] arm64: RMI: Create the realm descriptor Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 29/44] arm64: RMI: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 30/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 31/44] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 32/44] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 33/44] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 34/44] arm64: RMI: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 35/44] arm64: RMI: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 36/44] arm64: RMI: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 37/44] arm64: RMI: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2026-05-19 10:25   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 38/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 39/44] arm64: RMI: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 40/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 41/44] arm64: RMI: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 42/44] arm64: RMI: Provide register list for unfinalized RMI RECs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 43/44] arm64: RMI: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 44/44] arm64: RMI: Enable realms to be created Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=864ik0x22q.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm.com \
    --cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox