* [PATCH v11 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag
2026-07-27 19:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-27 19:03 ` Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:01 ` Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Kalra @ 2026-07-27 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb
Cc: pbonzini, aik, Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen,
Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu,
xin, pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen,
darwi, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Add a flag indicating whether RMPOPT instruction is supported.
RMPOPT is a new instruction that reduces the performance overhead of RMP
checks for the hypervisor and non-SNP guests by allowing those checks to be
skipped when 1-GB memory regions are known to contain no SEV-SNP guest memory.
For more information on the RMPOPT instruction, see the AMD64 RMPOPT
technical documentation.
[ bp: Zap respective tools/ change. ]
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/39e9ee269a572c516a3f4e937bfe12d00697d5e6.1782841284.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index 3d0940a3b9f3..dbccde9ee5cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_K8 ( 3*32+ 4) /* Opteron, Athlon64 */
#define X86_FEATURE_ZEN5 ( 3*32+ 5) /* CPU based on Zen5 microarchitecture */
#define X86_FEATURE_ZEN6 ( 3*32+ 6) /* CPU based on Zen6 microarchitecture */
-/* Free ( 3*32+ 7) */
+#define X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT ( 3*32+ 7) /* Support for AMD RMPOPT instruction */
#define X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC ( 3*32+ 8) /* "constant_tsc" TSC ticks at a constant rate */
/* free: was #define X86_FEATURE_UP ( 3*32+ 9) * "up" SMP kernel running on UP */
#define X86_FEATURE_ART ( 3*32+10) /* "art" Always running timer (ART) */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
index 937129ce6a96..021c0bf22de2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
{ X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2, CPUID_EAX, 0, 0x80000022, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2, CPUID_EAX, 1, 0x80000022, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_PMC_FREEZE, CPUID_EAX, 2, 0x80000022, 0 },
+ { X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT, CPUID_EDX, 0, 0x80000025, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES, CPUID_EAX, 30, 0x80000026, 0 },
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
};
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH v11 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag
2026-07-27 19:03 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-27 19:01 ` Ashish Kalra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Kalra @ 2026-07-27 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb
Cc: pbonzini, aik, Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen,
Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu,
xin, pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen,
darwi, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Add a flag indicating whether RMPOPT instruction is supported.
RMPOPT is a new instruction that reduces the performance overhead of RMP
checks for the hypervisor and non-SNP guests by allowing those checks to be
skipped when 1-GB memory regions are known to contain no SEV-SNP guest memory.
For more information on the RMPOPT instruction, see the AMD64 RMPOPT
technical documentation.
[ bp: Zap respective tools/ change. ]
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/39e9ee269a572c516a3f4e937bfe12d00697d5e6.1782841284.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index 3d0940a3b9f3..dbccde9ee5cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_K8 ( 3*32+ 4) /* Opteron, Athlon64 */
#define X86_FEATURE_ZEN5 ( 3*32+ 5) /* CPU based on Zen5 microarchitecture */
#define X86_FEATURE_ZEN6 ( 3*32+ 6) /* CPU based on Zen6 microarchitecture */
-/* Free ( 3*32+ 7) */
+#define X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT ( 3*32+ 7) /* Support for AMD RMPOPT instruction */
#define X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC ( 3*32+ 8) /* "constant_tsc" TSC ticks at a constant rate */
/* free: was #define X86_FEATURE_UP ( 3*32+ 9) * "up" SMP kernel running on UP */
#define X86_FEATURE_ART ( 3*32+10) /* "art" Always running timer (ART) */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
index 937129ce6a96..021c0bf22de2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
{ X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2, CPUID_EAX, 0, 0x80000022, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2, CPUID_EAX, 1, 0x80000022, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_PMC_FREEZE, CPUID_EAX, 2, 0x80000022, 0 },
+ { X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT, CPUID_EDX, 0, 0x80000025, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES, CPUID_EAX, 30, 0x80000026, 0 },
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }
};
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 2/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
2026-07-27 19:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:03 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-27 19:04 ` Ashish Kalra
2026-07-29 2:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Kalra @ 2026-07-27 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb
Cc: pbonzini, aik, Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen,
Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu,
xin, pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen,
darwi, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
While SNP is active, every memory write is checked against the RMP to
protect SEV-SNP guest memory. A core performs these RMP checks only once
SNP has been initialized via SNP_INIT and the SNP-enable bit in SYSCFG is
set on that core; the firmware requires the SNP-enable bit to be set on
every present CPU before SNP initialization.
A core that is not SNP-enabled and not SNP-initialized performs no RMP
checks at all, so there is no valid configuration with SNP active and any
CPU exempt from RMP checks.
The firmware determines which CPUs are present from the processor and the
BIOS/UEFI configuration (e.g. SMT disabled in the BIOS) and enumerates
them at SNP init; it is not aware of the OS bringing CPUs online or
offline afterwards.
SNP_INIT fails unless SnpEn is set on all CPUs, so a CPU that is offline
when SNP_INIT is issued, does not have SnpEn set, SNP_INIT fails, and
there can be no SNP guest memory. OS CPU hotplug can thus diverge from
the firmware's expectations and break SNP.
Tie CPU hotplug to the SNP-enable bit: disable it in snp_prepare() before
SNP is enabled, and re-enable it in snp_shutdown() once the firmware has
disabled SNP.
If snp_prepare() fails before enabling SNP it re-enables hotplug itself;
once SNP is enabled hotplug stays disabled, including across a failed
SNP_INIT and across the legacy SNP_SHUTDOWN_EX path, both of which leave
SNP enabled.
A kexec target that boots with SNP already enabled, disables hotplug once
in snp_rmptable_init(), since snp_prepare() bails when SNP is already
enabled.
With CPU hotplug now disabled while SNP is active, the online CPU mask is
stable, so the cpus_read_lock() previously taken in snp_prepare() to
iterate it is redundant. Drop cpus_read_lock()/cpus_read_unlock() here.
The RMPOPT setup and cleanup added later are introduced after this patch
and never take the lock for the same reason.
Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
index cff285d8ad8e..e2f69fba0938 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
@@ -513,7 +513,6 @@ static void clear_hsave_pa(void *arg)
int snp_prepare(void)
{
- int ret;
u64 val;
/*
@@ -526,14 +525,21 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
clear_rmp();
- cpus_read_lock();
+ /*
+ * Disable CPU hotplug before enabling SNP: no CPU may come online
+ * without SnpEn while SNP is active, and none may go offline during
+ * enable. This keeps cpu_online_mask stable for the check and the
+ * on_each_cpu() calls below, so cpus_read_lock() is not needed. It is
+ * re-enabled in snp_shutdown() once the firmware disables SNP.
+ */
+ cpu_hotplug_disable();
if (!cpumask_equal(cpu_online_mask, cpu_present_mask)) {
- ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ cpu_hotplug_enable();
pr_warn("SNP init failed: not all CPUs online. (%*pbl online <-> %*pbl present masks).\n",
cpumask_pr_args(cpu_online_mask),
cpumask_pr_args(cpu_present_mask));
- goto unlock;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
@@ -548,12 +554,7 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
/* SNP_INIT requires MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA to be cleared on all CPUs. */
on_each_cpu(clear_hsave_pa, NULL, 1);
- ret = 0;
-
-unlock:
- cpus_read_unlock();
-
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_prepare, "ccp");
@@ -565,6 +566,13 @@ void snp_shutdown(void)
if (syscfg & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
return;
+ /*
+ * The firmware has disabled SNP (SnpEn is clear), so re-enable CPU
+ * hotplug. A legacy SNP shutdown returns above with SnpEn still set and
+ * leaves hotplug disabled.
+ */
+ cpu_hotplug_enable();
+
clear_rmp();
on_each_cpu(mfd_reconfigure, NULL, 1);
}
@@ -577,6 +585,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_shutdown, "ccp");
*/
int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
{
+ u64 val;
+
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP)))
return -ENOSYS;
@@ -586,6 +596,15 @@ int __init snp_rmptable_init(void)
if (!setup_rmptable())
return -ENOSYS;
+ /*
+ * On a kexec boot SNP may already be enabled (legacy firmware leaves
+ * SnpEn set across shutdown), in which case snp_prepare() bails without
+ * disabling CPU hotplug, so disable it here.
+ */
+ rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG, val);
+ if (val & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
+ cpu_hotplug_disable();
+
/*
* Setting crash_kexec_post_notifiers to 'true' to ensure that SNP panic
* notifier is invoked to do SNP IOMMU shutdown before kdump.
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-29 2:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-29 17:51 ` Kalra, Ashish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-07-29 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ashish Kalra
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot,
ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin,
pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi,
linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 07:04:31PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> With CPU hotplug now disabled while SNP is active, the online CPU mask is
> stable, so the cpus_read_lock() previously taken in snp_prepare() to
> iterate it is redundant. Drop cpus_read_lock()/cpus_read_unlock() here.
> The RMPOPT setup and cleanup added later are introduced after this patch
> and never take the lock for the same reason.
Why do I even bother writing it?
"do ... not talk about future patches because git history is not always
linear"
> Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index cff285d8ad8e..e2f69fba0938 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -513,7 +513,6 @@ static void clear_hsave_pa(void *arg)
>
> int snp_prepare(void)
> {
> - int ret;
> u64 val;
>
> /*
> @@ -526,14 +525,21 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
>
> clear_rmp();
>
> - cpus_read_lock();
> + /*
> + * Disable CPU hotplug before enabling SNP: no CPU may come online
> + * without SnpEn while SNP is active, and none may go offline during
> + * enable. This keeps cpu_online_mask stable for the check and the
> + * on_each_cpu() calls below, so cpus_read_lock() is not needed. It is
> + * re-enabled in snp_shutdown() once the firmware disables SNP.
> + */
> + cpu_hotplug_disable();
No need for too much splainin' and besides, that comment'll grow out-of-whack
sooner than you think:
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
index e2f69fba0938..731ea25fba37 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
@@ -528,9 +528,7 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
/*
* Disable CPU hotplug before enabling SNP: no CPU may come online
* without SnpEn while SNP is active, and none may go offline during
- * enable. This keeps cpu_online_mask stable for the check and the
- * on_each_cpu() calls below, so cpus_read_lock() is not needed. It is
- * re-enabled in snp_shutdown() once the firmware disables SNP.
+ * enable.
*/
cpu_hotplug_disable();
> if (!cpumask_equal(cpu_online_mask, cpu_present_mask)) {
> - ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + cpu_hotplug_enable();
> pr_warn("SNP init failed: not all CPUs online. (%*pbl online <-> %*pbl present masks).\n",
> cpumask_pr_args(cpu_online_mask),
> cpumask_pr_args(cpu_present_mask));
> - goto unlock;
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
> wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
> @@ -548,12 +554,7 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
> /* SNP_INIT requires MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA to be cleared on all CPUs. */
> on_each_cpu(clear_hsave_pa, NULL, 1);
>
> - ret = 0;
> -
> -unlock:
> - cpus_read_unlock();
> -
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_prepare, "ccp");
>
> @@ -565,6 +566,13 @@ void snp_shutdown(void)
> if (syscfg & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * The firmware has disabled SNP (SnpEn is clear), so re-enable CPU
> + * hotplug. A legacy SNP shutdown returns above with SnpEn still set and
> + * leaves hotplug disabled.
> + */
> + cpu_hotplug_enable();
What happens if CPUs get offlined here after hotplug has been enabled and...
> clear_rmp();
> on_each_cpu(mfd_reconfigure, NULL, 1);
... they miss the mfd_reconfigure()?
> }
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active
2026-07-29 2:15 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2026-07-29 17:51 ` Kalra, Ashish
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kalra, Ashish @ 2026-07-29 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot,
ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin,
pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi,
linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
On 7/28/2026 9:15 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 07:04:31PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> With CPU hotplug now disabled while SNP is active, the online CPU mask is
>> stable, so the cpus_read_lock() previously taken in snp_prepare() to
>> iterate it is redundant. Drop cpus_read_lock()/cpus_read_unlock() here.
>> The RMPOPT setup and cleanup added later are introduced after this patch
>> and never take the lock for the same reason.
>
> Why do I even bother writing it?
>
> "do ... not talk about future patches because git history is not always
> linear"
Will drop the future patch reference from the commit log.
>
>> Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> index cff285d8ad8e..e2f69fba0938 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> @@ -513,7 +513,6 @@ static void clear_hsave_pa(void *arg)
>>
>> int snp_prepare(void)
>> {
>> - int ret;
>> u64 val;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -526,14 +525,21 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
>>
>> clear_rmp();
>>
>> - cpus_read_lock();
>> + /*
>> + * Disable CPU hotplug before enabling SNP: no CPU may come online
>> + * without SnpEn while SNP is active, and none may go offline during
>> + * enable. This keeps cpu_online_mask stable for the check and the
>> + * on_each_cpu() calls below, so cpus_read_lock() is not needed. It is
>> + * re-enabled in snp_shutdown() once the firmware disables SNP.
>> + */
>> + cpu_hotplug_disable();
>
> No need for too much splainin' and besides, that comment'll grow out-of-whack
> sooner than you think:
>
Will trim the comment.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index e2f69fba0938..731ea25fba37 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -528,9 +528,7 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
> /*
> * Disable CPU hotplug before enabling SNP: no CPU may come online
> * without SnpEn while SNP is active, and none may go offline during
> - * enable. This keeps cpu_online_mask stable for the check and the
> - * on_each_cpu() calls below, so cpus_read_lock() is not needed. It is
> - * re-enabled in snp_shutdown() once the firmware disables SNP.
> + * enable.
> */
> cpu_hotplug_disable();
>
>> if (!cpumask_equal(cpu_online_mask, cpu_present_mask)) {
>> - ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + cpu_hotplug_enable();
>> pr_warn("SNP init failed: not all CPUs online. (%*pbl online <-> %*pbl present masks).\n",
>> cpumask_pr_args(cpu_online_mask),
>> cpumask_pr_args(cpu_present_mask));
>> - goto unlock;
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
>> @@ -548,12 +554,7 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
>> /* SNP_INIT requires MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA to be cleared on all CPUs. */
>> on_each_cpu(clear_hsave_pa, NULL, 1);
>>
>> - ret = 0;
>> -
>> -unlock:
>> - cpus_read_unlock();
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_prepare, "ccp");
>>
>> @@ -565,6 +566,13 @@ void snp_shutdown(void)
>> if (syscfg & MSR_AMD64_SYSCFG_SNP_EN)
>> return;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * The firmware has disabled SNP (SnpEn is clear), so re-enable CPU
>> + * hotplug. A legacy SNP shutdown returns above with SnpEn still set and
>> + * leaves hotplug disabled.
>> + */
>> + cpu_hotplug_enable();
>
> What happens if CPUs get offlined here after hotplug has been enabled and...
>
>> clear_rmp();
>> on_each_cpu(mfd_reconfigure, NULL, 1);
>
> ... they miss the mfd_reconfigure()?
>
>> }
>
Yes, re-enable should happens last in snp_shutdown() (after clear_rmp()/mfd_reconfigure()).
Thanks,
Ashish
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
2026-07-27 19:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:03 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT feature flag Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] x86/sev: Disable CPU hotplug while SNP is active Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-27 19:04 ` Ashish Kalra
2026-07-30 2:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Kalra @ 2026-07-27 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb
Cc: pbonzini, aik, Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen,
Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu,
xin, pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen,
darwi, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
The new RMPOPT instruction helps manage per-CPU RMP optimization
structures inside the CPU. It takes a 1GB-aligned physical address
and either returns the status of the optimizations or tries to enable
the optimizations.
Per-CPU RMPOPT tables support at most 2 TB of addressable memory for
RMP optimizations.
Initialize the per-CPU RMPOPT table base to the starting physical
address. This enables RMP optimization for up to 2 TB of system RAM on
all CPUs.
Additionally, add support to setup and enable RMPOPT once SNP is
enabled and initialized.
Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 3 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h | 2 +
arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c | 3 ++
4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
index 18c4be75e927..d2cb0a7cd0a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
@@ -761,6 +761,9 @@
#define MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED_BIT 0
#define MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED_BIT)
#define MSR_AMD64_RMP_SEGMENT_SHIFT(x) (((x) & GENMASK_ULL(13, 8)) >> 8)
+#define MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE 0xc0010139
+#define MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE_BIT 0
+#define MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE_BIT)
#define MSR_SVSM_CAA 0xc001f000
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
index 594cfa19cbd4..6fd72a44a51e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ static inline void snp_leak_pages(u64 pfn, unsigned int pages)
__snp_leak_pages(pfn, pages, true);
}
int snp_prepare(void);
+void snp_setup_rmpopt(void);
void snp_shutdown(void);
#else
static inline bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void) { return false; }
@@ -680,6 +681,7 @@ static inline void snp_leak_pages(u64 pfn, unsigned int npages) {}
static inline void kdump_sev_callback(void) { }
static inline void snp_fixup_e820_tables(void) {}
static inline int snp_prepare(void) { return -ENODEV; }
+static inline void snp_setup_rmpopt(void) {}
static inline void snp_shutdown(void) {}
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
index e2f69fba0938..8bfd80284836 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
@@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ static void *rmp_bookkeeping __ro_after_init;
static u64 probed_rmp_base, probed_rmp_size;
+static cpumask_var_t rmpopt_cpumask;
+static phys_addr_t rmpopt_pa_start;
+
static LIST_HEAD(snp_leaked_pages_list);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(snp_leaked_pages_list_lock);
@@ -558,6 +561,17 @@ int snp_prepare(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_prepare, "ccp");
+static void snp_cleanup_rmpopt(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
+ wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, 0);
+
+ free_cpumask_var(rmpopt_cpumask);
+ rmpopt_pa_start = 0;
+}
+
void snp_shutdown(void)
{
u64 syscfg;
@@ -567,10 +581,11 @@ void snp_shutdown(void)
return;
/*
- * The firmware has disabled SNP (SnpEn is clear), so re-enable CPU
- * hotplug. A legacy SNP shutdown returns above with SnpEn still set and
- * leaves hotplug disabled.
+ * Clear the RMPOPT_BASE MSRs while CPU hotplug is still disabled, then
+ * re-enable hotplug now that the firmware has disabled SNP. A legacy SNP
+ * shutdown returns above with SnpEn still set and leaves hotplug disabled.
*/
+ snp_cleanup_rmpopt();
cpu_hotplug_enable();
clear_rmp();
@@ -578,6 +593,46 @@ void snp_shutdown(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_shutdown, "ccp");
+static bool rmpopt_capable(void)
+{
+ return cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT) &&
+ cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
+}
+
+void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
+{
+ u64 rmpopt_base;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (!rmpopt_capable())
+ return;
+
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rmpopt_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+ pr_err("Failed to allocate RMPOPT cpumask\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The RMPOPT_BASE MSR is per-core, so only one thread per core needs
+ * to set up the RMPOPT_BASE MSR. All primary threads are online,
+ * otherwise SNP would not have been enabled.
+ */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask);
+
+ rmpopt_pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(PFN_PHYS(min_low_pfn), SZ_1G);
+ rmpopt_base = rmpopt_pa_start | MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_ENABLE;
+
+ /*
+ * Per-CPU RMPOPT tables cover at most 2 TB. Program each core's
+ * RMPOPT_BASE with the start of RAM to optimize up to 2 TB.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
+ wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, rmpopt_base);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_setup_rmpopt, "ccp");
+
/*
* Do the necessary preparations which are verified by the firmware as
* described in the SNP_INIT_EX firmware command description in the SNP
@@ -705,10 +760,12 @@ bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP))
rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
- if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
+ if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED) {
return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
- else
+ } else {
+ setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
+ }
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
index ca473ca198b8..c002a7ca26a8 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
@@ -1477,6 +1477,9 @@ static int __sev_snp_init_locked(int *error, unsigned int max_snp_asid)
}
snp_hv_fixed_pages_state_update(sev, HV_FIXED);
+
+ snp_setup_rmpopt();
+
sev->snp_initialized = true;
dev_dbg(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP firmware initialized, SEV-TIO is %s\n",
data.tio_en ? "enabled" : "disabled");
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-30 2:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-30 2:55 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-30 20:00 ` Kalra, Ashish
0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-07-30 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ashish Kalra
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot,
ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin,
pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi,
linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 07:04:57PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> @@ -705,10 +760,12 @@ bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
> if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP))
> rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
>
> - if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
> + if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED) {
> return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
> - else
> + } else {
> + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
That looks a bit squirreled away in a probing function. Let's make that a bit
more obvious:
bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
{
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP)) {
rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
} else {
/* RMPOPT is supported only with a segmented RMP table. */
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
}
}
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> index ca473ca198b8..c002a7ca26a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> @@ -1477,6 +1477,9 @@ static int __sev_snp_init_locked(int *error, unsigned int max_snp_asid)
> }
>
> snp_hv_fixed_pages_state_update(sev, HV_FIXED);
> +
> + snp_setup_rmpopt();
Why is this thing here and not at the end?
SEV-TIO is supposed to always run last or it doesn't matter?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
2026-07-30 2:07 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2026-07-30 2:55 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-30 3:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-30 20:00 ` Kalra, Ashish
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: K Prateek Nayak @ 2026-07-30 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, Ashish Kalra
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng,
jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin, pawan.kumar.gupta,
babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi, linux-kernel,
linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
Hello Boris,
On 7/30/2026 7:37 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 07:04:57PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> @@ -705,10 +760,12 @@ bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
>> if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP))
>> rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
>>
>> - if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
>> + if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED) {
>> return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
>> - else
>> + } else {
>> + setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
>
> That looks a bit squirreled away in a probing function. Let's make that a bit
> more obvious:
>
> bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
> {
> if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP)) {
> rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
>
> if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
> return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
> } else {
I believe there can be cases where CPUID advertises
X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP but rmf_cfg doesn't set
MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED because otherwise checking rmp_cfg in
addition to the feature bit makes no sense.
In that case we should attempt a probe_contiguous_rmptable_info() even
for X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP.
Essentially drop that "else" and do something like:
bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
{
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP)) {
rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
}
/*
* Segmented RMP is either not supported on the platform or
* is disabled by the firmware. RMPOPT is not not supported
* without segmented RMP.
*/
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
}
> /* RMPOPT is supported only with a segmented RMP table. */
> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
>
> return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
> }
> }
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
2026-07-30 2:55 ` K Prateek Nayak
@ 2026-07-30 3:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-30 19:52 ` Kalra, Ashish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-07-30 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: K Prateek Nayak
Cc: Ashish Kalra, tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng,
jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin, pawan.kumar.gupta,
babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi, linux-kernel,
linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 08:25:37AM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> I believe there can be cases where CPUID advertises
> X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP but rmf_cfg doesn't set
> MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED because otherwise checking rmp_cfg in
> addition to the feature bit makes no sense.
>
> In that case we should attempt a probe_contiguous_rmptable_info() even
> for X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP.
>
> Essentially drop that "else" and do something like:
>
> bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
> {
> if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP)) {
> rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
>
> if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
> return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
> }
>
> /*
> * Segmented RMP is either not supported on the platform or
> * is disabled by the firmware. RMPOPT is not not supported
> * without segmented RMP.
> */
> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
>
> return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
> }
That makes sense.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
2026-07-30 3:39 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2026-07-30 19:52 ` Kalra, Ashish
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kalra, Ashish @ 2026-07-30 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov, K Prateek Nayak
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng,
jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin, pawan.kumar.gupta,
babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi, linux-kernel,
linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
On 7/29/2026 10:39 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 08:25:37AM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>> I believe there can be cases where CPUID advertises
>> X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP but rmf_cfg doesn't set
>> MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED because otherwise checking rmp_cfg in
>> addition to the feature bit makes no sense.
>>
>> In that case we should attempt a probe_contiguous_rmptable_info() even
>> for X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP.
>>
>> Essentially drop that "else" and do something like:
>>
>> bool snp_probe_rmptable_info(void)
>> {
>> if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEGMENTED_RMP)) {
>> rdmsrq(MSR_AMD64_RMP_CFG, rmp_cfg);
>>
>> if (rmp_cfg & MSR_AMD64_SEG_RMP_ENABLED)
>> return probe_segmented_rmptable_info();
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> * Segmented RMP is either not supported on the platform or
>> * is disabled by the firmware. RMPOPT is not not supported
>> * without segmented RMP.
>> */
>> setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RMPOPT);
>>
>> return probe_contiguous_rmptable_info();
>> }
>
> That makes sense.
>
Ack.
Thanks,
Ashish
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
2026-07-30 2:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-30 2:55 ` K Prateek Nayak
@ 2026-07-30 20:00 ` Kalra, Ashish
2026-07-31 0:12 ` Borislav Petkov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kalra, Ashish @ 2026-07-30 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot,
ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin,
pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi,
linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
Hello Boris,
On 7/29/2026 9:07 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> index ca473ca198b8..c002a7ca26a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
>> @@ -1477,6 +1477,9 @@ static int __sev_snp_init_locked(int *error, unsigned int max_snp_asid)
>> }
>>
>> snp_hv_fixed_pages_state_update(sev, HV_FIXED);
>> +
>> + snp_setup_rmpopt();
>
> Why is this thing here and not at the end?
>
> SEV-TIO is supposed to always run last or it doesn't matter?
>
No hard dependency — it only needs SNP initialized (post SNP_INIT_EX/DF_FLUSH), and the initial pass is async anyway, so it's independent
of the SEV-TIO block and the panic notifier. So i can move it to the end (after the TIO block so it runs last without touching TIO ordering),
but is there a specific reason you want me to move it to the end, as it can just stay here after SNP_INIT.
Thanks,
Ashish
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs
2026-07-30 20:00 ` Kalra, Ashish
@ 2026-07-31 0:12 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-07-31 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kalra, Ashish
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot,
ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin,
pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi,
linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 03:00:55PM -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> No hard dependency — it only needs SNP initialized (post
> SNP_INIT_EX/DF_FLUSH), and the initial pass is async anyway, so it's
> independent of the SEV-TIO block and the panic notifier. So i can move it to
> the end (after the TIO block so it runs last without touching TIO ordering),
> but is there a specific reason you want me to move it to the end, as it can
> just stay here after SNP_INIT.
The usual reason is, you add new code at the end. I.e., you append it. That is
usually easier for backporting too.
When you put it *NOT* at the end, then the first question I have is, why is
this thing there? Is there a particular reason for it to be there? Is ordering
important all of a sudden?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously
2026-07-27 19:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-27 19:04 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] x86/sev: Initialize RMPOPT configuration MSRs Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-27 19:05 ` Ashish Kalra
2026-07-31 5:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:06 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
5 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Kalra @ 2026-07-27 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb
Cc: pbonzini, aik, Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen,
Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu,
xin, pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen,
darwi, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
When SEV-SNP is enabled, all writes to memory are checked to ensure
integrity of SNP guest memory. This imposes performance overhead on the
whole system.
RMPOPT is a new instruction that minimizes the performance overhead of
RMP checks on the hypervisor and on non-SNP guests by allowing RMP
checks to be skipped for 1GB regions of memory that are known not to
contain any SEV-SNP guest memory.
Add support for performing RMP optimizations asynchronously using a
dedicated workqueue.
Enable RMPOPT optimizations for up to 2TB of system RAM starting from
the lowest physical memory address aligned down to a 1GB boundary at
RMP initialization time. RMP checks can initially be skipped for 1GB
memory ranges that do not contain SEV-SNP guest memory (excluding
preassigned pages such as the RMP table and firmware pages). As SNP
guests are launched, RMPUPDATE will disable the corresponding RMPOPT
optimizations.
Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
index 8bfd80284836..04b19e64f832 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/iommu.h>
#include <linux/amd-iommu.h>
#include <linux/nospec.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <asm/sev.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -125,7 +126,18 @@ static void *rmp_bookkeeping __ro_after_init;
static u64 probed_rmp_base, probed_rmp_size;
static cpumask_var_t rmpopt_cpumask;
-static phys_addr_t rmpopt_pa_start;
+static phys_addr_t rmpopt_pa_start, rmpopt_pa_end;
+
+enum rmpopt_function {
+ RMPOPT_FUNC_VERIFY_AND_REPORT_STATUS,
+ RMPOPT_FUNC_REPORT_STATUS
+};
+
+#define RMPOPT_WORK_TIMEOUT 10000
+
+static struct workqueue_struct *rmpopt_wq;
+static struct delayed_work rmpopt_delayed_work;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(rmpopt_wq_mutex);
static LIST_HEAD(snp_leaked_pages_list);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(snp_leaked_pages_list_lock);
@@ -565,11 +577,20 @@ static void snp_cleanup_rmpopt(void)
{
int cpu;
+ guard(mutex)(&rmpopt_wq_mutex);
+
+ if (!rmpopt_wq)
+ return;
+
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rmpopt_delayed_work);
+ destroy_workqueue(rmpopt_wq);
+
for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, 0);
free_cpumask_var(rmpopt_cpumask);
- rmpopt_pa_start = 0;
+ rmpopt_pa_start = rmpopt_pa_end = 0;
+ rmpopt_wq = NULL;
}
void snp_shutdown(void)
@@ -599,6 +620,96 @@ static bool rmpopt_capable(void)
cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
}
+/*
+ * RMPOPT: F2 0F 01 FC
+ * Input: RAX = system physical address (1GB aligned)
+ * RCX = operation type
+ * Output: CF set if the range was optimized
+ */
+static inline bool __rmpopt(u64 pa_start, u64 op_type)
+{
+ bool optimized;
+
+ asm volatile(".byte 0xf2, 0x0f, 0x01, 0xfc"
+ : "=@ccc" (optimized)
+ : "a" (pa_start), "c" (op_type)
+ : "memory", "cc");
+
+ return optimized;
+}
+
+static void rmpopt(u64 pa)
+{
+ u64 pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(pa, SZ_1G);
+ u64 op_type = RMPOPT_FUNC_VERIFY_AND_REPORT_STATUS;
+
+ __rmpopt(pa_start, op_type);
+}
+
+/*
+ * 'val' is a system physical address.
+ */
+static void rmpopt_smp(void *val)
+{
+ rmpopt((u64)val);
+}
+
+/*
+ * RMPOPT optimizations skip RMP checks at 1GB granularity if this
+ * range of memory does not contain any SNP guest memory.
+ */
+static void rmpopt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ cpumask_var_t follower_mask;
+ phys_addr_t pa;
+ int this_cpu;
+
+ pr_info("Attempt RMP optimizations on physical address range @1GB alignment [0x%016llx - 0x%016llx]\n",
+ rmpopt_pa_start, rmpopt_pa_end);
+
+ if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&follower_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+ pr_warn("RMP optimization pass skipped: cpumask allocation failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * RMPOPT scans the RMP table, stores the result of the scan in the
+ * reserved processor memory. The RMP scan is the most expensive
+ * part. If a second RMPOPT occurs, it can skip the expensive scan
+ * if they can see a cached result in the reserved processor memory.
+ *
+ * Do RMPOPT on one CPU alone. Then, follow that up with RMPOPT
+ * on every other primary thread. Followers are "designed to"
+ * skip the scan if they see the "cached" scan results.
+ *
+ * Pin the worker to the current CPU for the leader loop so that
+ * this_cpu remains valid and the RMPOPT instruction executes on
+ * the correct CPU. Use migrate_disable() rather than get_cpu() to
+ * prevent migration while still allowing preemption.
+ */
+ migrate_disable();
+ this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ cpumask_andnot(follower_mask, rmpopt_cpumask,
+ topology_sibling_cpumask(this_cpu));
+
+ for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
+ rmpopt(pa);
+
+ migrate_enable();
+
+ /*
+ * Followers: run RMPOPT on the remaining cores. cpus_read_lock() is
+ * intentionally not held here: CPU hotplug is disabled for the entire
+ * time SNP is active (see snp_prepare()), and this work only runs while
+ * SNP is active, so the follower set stays valid across the whole scan.
+ */
+ for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
+ on_each_cpu_mask(follower_mask, rmpopt_smp, (void *)pa, true);
+
+ free_cpumask_var(follower_mask);
+}
+
void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
{
u64 rmpopt_base;
@@ -607,8 +718,38 @@ void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
if (!rmpopt_capable())
return;
+ guard(mutex)(&rmpopt_wq_mutex);
+
+ /*
+ * On re-initialization after a legacy SNP shutdown (SNP_SHUTDOWN_EX
+ * with x86_snp_shutdown=0), snp_shutdown() and thus snp_cleanup_rmpopt()
+ * are skipped, so the workqueue, delayed work, cpumask and per-CPU
+ * RMPOPT_BASE MSRs are still set up and valid (SnpEn stayed set and
+ * CPU hotplug stayed disabled). Rather than re-doing the setup, which
+ * would leak the existing state, just re-queue the optimization pass
+ * to re-optimize any memory the previous SNP session de-optimized.
+ */
+ if (rmpopt_wq) {
+ queue_delayed_work(rmpopt_wq, &rmpopt_delayed_work, 0);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Create an RMPOPT-specific workqueue to avoid scheduling
+ * RMPOPT workitem on the global system workqueue.
+ */
+ rmpopt_wq = alloc_workqueue("rmpopt_wq", WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
+ if (!rmpopt_wq) {
+ pr_err("Failed to allocate RMPOPT workqueue\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rmpopt_delayed_work, rmpopt_work_handler);
+
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rmpopt_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
pr_err("Failed to allocate RMPOPT cpumask\n");
+ destroy_workqueue(rmpopt_wq);
+ rmpopt_wq = NULL;
return;
}
@@ -630,6 +771,21 @@ void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
*/
for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, rmpopt_base);
+
+ rmpopt_pa_end = ALIGN(PFN_PHYS(max_pfn), SZ_1G);
+
+ /* Limit memory scanning to 2TB of RAM */
+ if ((rmpopt_pa_end - rmpopt_pa_start) > SZ_2T) {
+ pr_info("RMPOPT coverage limited to 2TB; memory above 0x%llx not optimized\n",
+ rmpopt_pa_start + SZ_2T);
+ rmpopt_pa_end = rmpopt_pa_start + SZ_2T;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Once all per-CPU RMPOPT tables have been configured, enable RMPOPT
+ * optimizations on all physical memory.
+ */
+ queue_delayed_work(rmpopt_wq, &rmpopt_delayed_work, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_setup_rmpopt, "ccp");
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-31 5:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-07-31 12:37 ` Kalra, Ashish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2026-07-31 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ashish Kalra
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot,
ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin,
pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi,
linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 07:05:29PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>
> When SEV-SNP is enabled, all writes to memory are checked to ensure
> integrity of SNP guest memory. This imposes performance overhead on the
s/SNP//
The checks are done not only on SNP guest memory but on *all* memory, as your
next paragraph suggests.
> whole system.
>
> RMPOPT is a new instruction that minimizes the performance overhead of
> RMP checks on the hypervisor and on non-SNP guests by allowing RMP
> checks to be skipped for 1GB regions of memory that are known not to
> contain any SEV-SNP guest memory.
Let's tone down the abbreviations. "SNP guest memory" is enough and let's
stick to that.
> Add support for performing RMP optimizations asynchronously using a
> dedicated workqueue.
>
> Enable RMPOPT optimizations for up to 2TB of system RAM starting from
> the lowest physical memory address aligned down to a 1GB boundary at
> RMP initialization time. RMP checks can initially be skipped for 1GB
Why "initially"? What are you trying to say here?
> memory ranges that do not contain SEV-SNP guest memory (excluding
> preassigned pages such as the RMP table and firmware pages). As SNP
> guests are launched, RMPUPDATE will disable the corresponding RMPOPT
> optimizations.
Because it will add pages to the RMP table?
This paragraph needs clarification.
> Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> index 8bfd80284836..04b19e64f832 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/amd-iommu.h>
> #include <linux/nospec.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include <asm/sev.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> @@ -125,7 +126,18 @@ static void *rmp_bookkeeping __ro_after_init;
> static u64 probed_rmp_base, probed_rmp_size;
>
> static cpumask_var_t rmpopt_cpumask;
> -static phys_addr_t rmpopt_pa_start;
> +static phys_addr_t rmpopt_pa_start, rmpopt_pa_end;
> +
> +enum rmpopt_function {
rmpopt_op_type
> + RMPOPT_FUNC_VERIFY_AND_REPORT_STATUS,
> + RMPOPT_FUNC_REPORT_STATUS
RMPOPT_OP_VERIFY...
> +};
> +
/*
* This timeout was selected this way because...
*/
> +#define RMPOPT_WORK_TIMEOUT 10000
> +
> +static struct workqueue_struct *rmpopt_wq;
> +static struct delayed_work rmpopt_delayed_work;
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(rmpopt_wq_mutex);
>
> static LIST_HEAD(snp_leaked_pages_list);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(snp_leaked_pages_list_lock);
> @@ -565,11 +577,20 @@ static void snp_cleanup_rmpopt(void)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> + guard(mutex)(&rmpopt_wq_mutex);
> +
> + if (!rmpopt_wq)
> + return;
If there's no workqueue, you skip all the rest, including undoing things which
are not workqueue-related?
That workqueue pointer must be magical and special. Yet, I don't see anything
explaining that.
> +
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rmpopt_delayed_work);
> + destroy_workqueue(rmpopt_wq);
> +
> for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
> wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, 0);
>
> free_cpumask_var(rmpopt_cpumask);
> - rmpopt_pa_start = 0;
> + rmpopt_pa_start = rmpopt_pa_end = 0;
> + rmpopt_wq = NULL;
> }
>
> void snp_shutdown(void)
> @@ -599,6 +620,96 @@ static bool rmpopt_capable(void)
> cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * RMPOPT: F2 0F 01 FC
> + * Input: RAX = system physical address (1GB aligned)
> + * RCX = operation type
> + * Output: CF set if the range was optimized
> + */
> +static inline bool __rmpopt(u64 pa_start, u64 op_type)
> +{
> + bool optimized;
> +
/*
* needs a comment here which says which binutils version
* supports the RMPOPT mnemonic.
*/
> + asm volatile(".byte 0xf2, 0x0f, 0x01, 0xfc"
> + : "=@ccc" (optimized)
> + : "a" (pa_start), "c" (op_type)
> + : "memory", "cc");
> +
> + return optimized;
> +}
> +
> +static void rmpopt(u64 pa)
> +{
> + u64 pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(pa, SZ_1G);
> + u64 op_type = RMPOPT_FUNC_VERIFY_AND_REPORT_STATUS;
enum rmpopt_op_type op = ...
> +
> + __rmpopt(pa_start, op_type);
Looks like the __rmpopt() carve out is not really necessary and you can merge
it back into rmpopt().
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * 'val' is a system physical address.
> + */
> +static void rmpopt_smp(void *val)
You don't need that one - you can use rmpopt(). But keep on reading...
> +{
> + rmpopt((u64)val);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * RMPOPT optimizations skip RMP checks at 1GB granularity if this
> + * range of memory does not contain any SNP guest memory.
> + */
Put that comment above rmpopt().
> +static void rmpopt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + cpumask_var_t follower_mask;
> + phys_addr_t pa;
So either phys_addr_t or u64 but not both for a pa.
> + int this_cpu;
> +
> + pr_info("Attempt RMP optimizations on physical address range @1GB alignment [0x%016llx - 0x%016llx]\n",
> + rmpopt_pa_start, rmpopt_pa_end);
This is going to spam dmesg every time the workqueue runs?
Nope, zap it.
> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&follower_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> + pr_warn("RMP optimization pass skipped: cpumask allocation failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
Why? Why isn't the follower mask allocated once at init time?
> +
> + /*
> + * RMPOPT scans the RMP table, stores the result of the scan in the
> + * reserved processor memory. The RMP scan is the most expensive
> + * part. If a second RMPOPT occurs, it can skip the expensive scan
> + * if they can see a cached result in the reserved processor memory.
> + *
> + * Do RMPOPT on one CPU alone. Then, follow that up with RMPOPT
> + * on every other primary thread. Followers are "designed to"
> + * skip the scan if they see the "cached" scan results.
> + *
> + * Pin the worker to the current CPU for the leader loop so that
Isn't worker == leader here?
> + * this_cpu remains valid and the RMPOPT instruction executes on
> + * the correct CPU.
> Use migrate_disable() rather than get_cpu() to
> + * prevent migration while still allowing preemption.
No need to explain that.
> + */
> + migrate_disable();
> + this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + cpumask_andnot(follower_mask, rmpopt_cpumask,
> + topology_sibling_cpumask(this_cpu));
> +
> + for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
> + rmpopt(pa);
> +
> + migrate_enable();
> +
> + /*
> + * Followers: run RMPOPT on the remaining cores. cpus_read_lock() is
> + * intentionally not held here: CPU hotplug is disabled for the entire
> + * time SNP is active (see snp_prepare()), and this work only runs while
> + * SNP is active, so the follower set stays valid across the whole scan.
> + */
> + for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
> + on_each_cpu_mask(follower_mask, rmpopt_smp, (void *)pa, true);
An IPI per 1G pa?!?!? On each CPU?!
Instead of IPIing each CPU and inside the handler, doing the loop?
Nope.
> +
> + free_cpumask_var(follower_mask);
> +}
Ok, enough for this part. Part II coming up later.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously
2026-07-31 5:44 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2026-07-31 12:37 ` Kalra, Ashish
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Kalra, Ashish @ 2026-07-31 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borislav Petkov
Cc: tglx, mingo, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb, pbonzini, aik,
Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen, Nathan.Fontenot,
ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu, xin,
pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen, darwi,
linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
On 7/31/2026 12:44 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 07:05:29PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>>
>> When SEV-SNP is enabled, all writes to memory are checked to ensure
>> integrity of SNP guest memory. This imposes performance overhead on the
>
> s/SNP//
>
> The checks are done not only on SNP guest memory but on *all* memory, as your
> next paragraph suggests.
Yes, the checks are done on *all* memory but for ensuring the integrity of SNP
guest memory, so that is what the above paragraph is mentioning.
>
>> whole system.
>>
>> RMPOPT is a new instruction that minimizes the performance overhead of
>> RMP checks on the hypervisor and on non-SNP guests by allowing RMP
>> checks to be skipped for 1GB regions of memory that are known not to
>> contain any SEV-SNP guest memory.
>
> Let's tone down the abbreviations. "SNP guest memory" is enough and let's
> stick to that.
>
>> Add support for performing RMP optimizations asynchronously using a
>> dedicated workqueue.
>>
>> Enable RMPOPT optimizations for up to 2TB of system RAM starting from
>> the lowest physical memory address aligned down to a 1GB boundary at
>> RMP initialization time. RMP checks can initially be skipped for 1GB
>
> Why "initially"? What are you trying to say here?
"initially" meant the init-time state — before any SNP guests exist, all eligible 1 GB ranges are optimized — and the
last sentence covers how that changes as guests launch.
The other way i can put it is: "RMP checks are skipped for 1-GB ranges that don't contain SNP guest memory and
as SNP guests are launched, RMPUPDATE disables the corresponding optimizations".
>
>> memory ranges that do not contain SEV-SNP guest memory (excluding
>> preassigned pages such as the RMP table and firmware pages). As SNP
>> guests are launched, RMPUPDATE will disable the corresponding RMPOPT
>> optimizations.
>
> Because it will add pages to the RMP table?
>
> This paragraph needs clarification.
Not by adding pages — the RMP table already covers all memory. When RMPUPDATE assigns a page to an SNP guest
(guest-owned state) inside an optimized 1 GB region, the hardware clears that region's RMPOPT optimization, so RMP
checks resume there to protect the guest memory. I'll reword the paragraph to say that explicitly.
>
>> Suggested-by: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> index 8bfd80284836..04b19e64f832 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>> #include <linux/iommu.h>
>> #include <linux/amd-iommu.h>
>> #include <linux/nospec.h>
>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/sev.h>
>> #include <asm/processor.h>
>> @@ -125,7 +126,18 @@ static void *rmp_bookkeeping __ro_after_init;
>> static u64 probed_rmp_base, probed_rmp_size;
>>
>> static cpumask_var_t rmpopt_cpumask;
>> -static phys_addr_t rmpopt_pa_start;
>> +static phys_addr_t rmpopt_pa_start, rmpopt_pa_end;
>> +
>> +enum rmpopt_function {
>
> rmpopt_op_type
>
>> + RMPOPT_FUNC_VERIFY_AND_REPORT_STATUS,
>> + RMPOPT_FUNC_REPORT_STATUS
>
> RMPOPT_OP_VERIFY...
>
>> +};
>> +
>
> /*
> * This timeout was selected this way because...
> */
>
The value is a heuristic that came out of review feedback on the series, i can add a comment here
documenting what the timeout is for (coalescing SNP guest teardowns into one re-optimization pass and
letting guest pages convert back to shared before the scan).
>> +#define RMPOPT_WORK_TIMEOUT 10000
>> +
>> +static struct workqueue_struct *rmpopt_wq;
>> +static struct delayed_work rmpopt_delayed_work;
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(rmpopt_wq_mutex);
>>
>> static LIST_HEAD(snp_leaked_pages_list);
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(snp_leaked_pages_list_lock);
>> @@ -565,11 +577,20 @@ static void snp_cleanup_rmpopt(void)
>> {
>> int cpu;
>>
>> + guard(mutex)(&rmpopt_wq_mutex);
>> +
>> + if (!rmpopt_wq)
>> + return;
>
> If there's no workqueue, you skip all the rest, including undoing things which
> are not workqueue-related?
>
> That workqueue pointer must be magical and special. Yet, I don't see anything
> explaining that.
I will add a comment spelling that out.
>
>> +
>> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rmpopt_delayed_work);
>> + destroy_workqueue(rmpopt_wq);
>> +
>> for_each_cpu(cpu, rmpopt_cpumask)
>> wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_AMD64_RMPOPT_BASE, 0);
>>
>> free_cpumask_var(rmpopt_cpumask);
>> - rmpopt_pa_start = 0;
>> + rmpopt_pa_start = rmpopt_pa_end = 0;
>> + rmpopt_wq = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> void snp_shutdown(void)
>> @@ -599,6 +620,96 @@ static bool rmpopt_capable(void)
>> cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_SEV_SNP);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * RMPOPT: F2 0F 01 FC
>> + * Input: RAX = system physical address (1GB aligned)
>> + * RCX = operation type
>> + * Output: CF set if the range was optimized
>> + */
>> +static inline bool __rmpopt(u64 pa_start, u64 op_type)
>> +{
>> + bool optimized;
>> +
>
> /*
> * needs a comment here which says which binutils version
> * supports the RMPOPT mnemonic.
> */
>> + asm volatile(".byte 0xf2, 0x0f, 0x01, 0xfc"
>> + : "=@ccc" (optimized)
>> + : "a" (pa_start), "c" (op_type)
>> + : "memory", "cc");
>> +
>> + return optimized;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rmpopt(u64 pa)
>> +{
>> + u64 pa_start = ALIGN_DOWN(pa, SZ_1G);
>> + u64 op_type = RMPOPT_FUNC_VERIFY_AND_REPORT_STATUS;
>
> enum rmpopt_op_type op = ...
>
>> +
>> + __rmpopt(pa_start, op_type);
>
> Looks like the __rmpopt() carve out is not really necessary and you can merge
> it back into rmpopt().
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * 'val' is a system physical address.
>> + */
>> +static void rmpopt_smp(void *val)
>
> You don't need that one - you can use rmpopt(). But keep on reading...
>
>> +{
>> + rmpopt((u64)val);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * RMPOPT optimizations skip RMP checks at 1GB granularity if this
>> + * range of memory does not contain any SNP guest memory.
>> + */
>
> Put that comment above rmpopt().
Will merge __rmpopt() into rmpopt(), drop rmpopt_smp(), and switch the op type to enum rmpopt_op_type. Will move the
descriptive comment above rmpopt(), and add a note that binutils doesn't support the RMPOPT mnemonic yet, hence the
.byte encoding. The CF result is unused on this path, so will drop the output operand.
>
>> +static void rmpopt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + cpumask_var_t follower_mask;
>> + phys_addr_t pa;
>
> So either phys_addr_t or u64 but not both for a pa.
Ok.
>
>> + int this_cpu;
>> +
>> + pr_info("Attempt RMP optimizations on physical address range @1GB alignment [0x%016llx - 0x%016llx]\n",
>> + rmpopt_pa_start, rmpopt_pa_end);
>
> This is going to spam dmesg every time the workqueue runs?
>
> Nope, zap it.
Ok.
>
>> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&follower_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
>> + pr_warn("RMP optimization pass skipped: cpumask allocation failed\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> Why? Why isn't the follower mask allocated once at init time?
>
Will move the follower mask to a one-time allocation at setup (alongside rmpopt_cpumask and freed in
snp_cleanup_rmpopt()) and just recompute it per pass. The work handler no longer allocates/frees it, which also drops
the per-run allocation-failure path.
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * RMPOPT scans the RMP table, stores the result of the scan in the
>> + * reserved processor memory. The RMP scan is the most expensive
>> + * part. If a second RMPOPT occurs, it can skip the expensive scan
>> + * if they can see a cached result in the reserved processor memory.
>> + *
>> + * Do RMPOPT on one CPU alone. Then, follow that up with RMPOPT
>> + * on every other primary thread. Followers are "designed to"
>> + * skip the scan if they see the "cached" scan results.
>> + *
>> + * Pin the worker to the current CPU for the leader loop so that
>
> Isn't worker == leader here?
Right — the workqueue worker's CPU is the leader. Will reword the comment to use "leader"/"followers" consistently and drop
the redundant "worker" term.
>> + * this_cpu remains valid and the RMPOPT instruction executes on
>> + * the correct CPU.
>
>> Use migrate_disable() rather than get_cpu() to
>> + * prevent migration while still allowing preemption.
>
> No need to explain that.
>
Ok.
>> + */
>> + migrate_disable();
>> + this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> +
>> + cpumask_andnot(follower_mask, rmpopt_cpumask,
>> + topology_sibling_cpumask(this_cpu));
>> +
>> + for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
>> + rmpopt(pa);
>> +
>> + migrate_enable();
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Followers: run RMPOPT on the remaining cores. cpus_read_lock() is
>> + * intentionally not held here: CPU hotplug is disabled for the entire
>> + * time SNP is active (see snp_prepare()), and this work only runs while
>> + * SNP is active, so the follower set stays valid across the whole scan.
>> + */
>> + for (pa = rmpopt_pa_start; pa < rmpopt_pa_end; pa += SZ_1G)
>> + on_each_cpu_mask(follower_mask, rmpopt_smp, (void *)pa, true);
>
> An IPI per 1G pa?!?!? On each CPU?!
>
> Instead of IPIing each CPU and inside the handler, doing the loop?
>
> Nope.
>
You're right — an IPI per 1 GB is far too many. Will restructure to a single IPI per follower core: a new on_each_cpu()
callback can loop over the whole range on the CPU it runs on. The leader will call it directly (migrate-disabled) to populate
the RMP scan cache, then one on_each_cpu_mask() will run it on the remaining cores.
This will also fold nicely with the earlier cleanup: __rmpopt() getting merged into rmpopt().
One important tradeoff to be aware of: each follower IPI handler will now run a 2048-iteration loop with IRQs disabled —
but followers are RMP-scan cache hits (the leader populated the cache), so each rmpopt() there is cheap, and this only runs
at setup and guest-teardown re-optimization time.
Thanks,
Ashish
>> +
>> + free_cpumask_var(follower_mask);
>> +}
>
> Ok, enough for this part. Part II coming up later.
>
> Thx.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v11 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations.
2026-07-27 19:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] x86/sev: Add support to perform RMP optimizations asynchronously Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-27 19:05 ` Ashish Kalra
2026-07-27 19:06 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown Ashish Kalra
5 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Kalra @ 2026-07-27 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb
Cc: pbonzini, aik, Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen,
Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu,
xin, pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen,
darwi, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
RMPOPT table is a per-CPU table which indicates if 1GB regions of
physical memory are entirely hypervisor-owned or not.
When performing host memory accesses in hypervisor mode as well as
non-SNP guest mode, the processor may consult the RMPOPT table to
potentially skip an RMP access and improve performance.
Normal guest events clear RMP optimizations: pages are converted from
shared to private as SNP guests are launched, and large pages are split
and collapsed during guest operation -- both clear the RMPOPT
optimizations for the affected 1GB regions. Conversely, guest pages are
converted back to shared during SNP guest termination, so those regions
may become eligible for RMPOPT optimization again.
Without some intervention, all RMP optimizations would eventually be
lost. Add an interface to re-optimize all of physical memory.
The interface uses mod_delayed_work() instead of queue_delayed_work()
so that the delay timer is reset on each call. This provides proper
batching semantics: re-optimization runs 10 seconds after the *last*
VM termination rather than after the first. mod_delayed_work() also
re-queues work that is already in-flight, so a re-scan request
during an active scan is not silently dropped.
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
index 6fd72a44a51e..09b1c5d33790 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ static inline void snp_leak_pages(u64 pfn, unsigned int pages)
__snp_leak_pages(pfn, pages, true);
}
int snp_prepare(void);
+void snp_rmpopt_all_physmem(void);
void snp_setup_rmpopt(void);
void snp_shutdown(void);
#else
@@ -681,6 +682,7 @@ static inline void snp_leak_pages(u64 pfn, unsigned int npages) {}
static inline void kdump_sev_callback(void) { }
static inline void snp_fixup_e820_tables(void) {}
static inline int snp_prepare(void) { return -ENODEV; }
+static inline void snp_rmpopt_all_physmem(void) {}
static inline void snp_setup_rmpopt(void) {}
static inline void snp_shutdown(void) {}
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
index 04b19e64f832..291a360291eb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c
@@ -710,6 +710,21 @@ static void rmpopt_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
free_cpumask_var(follower_mask);
}
+void snp_rmpopt_all_physmem(void)
+{
+ if (!rmpopt_capable())
+ return;
+
+ guard(mutex)(&rmpopt_wq_mutex);
+
+ if (!rmpopt_wq)
+ return;
+
+ mod_delayed_work(rmpopt_wq, &rmpopt_delayed_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(RMPOPT_WORK_TIMEOUT));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(snp_rmpopt_all_physmem, "kvm-amd");
+
void snp_setup_rmpopt(void)
{
u64 rmpopt_base;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH v11 6/6] KVM: SEV: Perform RMP optimizations on SNP guest shutdown
2026-07-27 19:00 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RMPOPT support Ashish Kalra
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2026-07-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] x86/sev: Add interface to re-enable RMP optimizations Ashish Kalra
@ 2026-07-27 19:06 ` Ashish Kalra
5 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Ashish Kalra @ 2026-07-27 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, seanjc, peterz,
thomas.lendacky, herbert, davem, ardb
Cc: pbonzini, aik, Michael.Roth, KPrateek.Nayak, Tycho.Andersen,
Nathan.Fontenot, ackerleytng, jackyli, pgonda, rientjes, jacobhxu,
xin, pawan.kumar.gupta, babu.moger, dyoung, nikunj, john.allen,
darwi, linux-kernel, linux-crypto, kvm, linux-coco
From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Pages are converted from shared to private as SNP guests are launched.
This destroys exisiting RMPOPT optimizations in the regions where
pages are converted.
Conversely, guest pages are converted back to shared during SNP guest
termination and their region may become eligible for RMPOPT
optimization.
To take advantage of this, perform RMPOPT after guest termination.
Do it after a delay so that a single RMPOPT pass can be done if
multiple guests terminate in a short period of time.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 427229347876..c574849b1587 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -2992,6 +2992,16 @@ void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
*/
if (snp_decommission_context(kvm))
return;
+
+ /*
+ * Perform RMP optimizations on memory freed by terminating
+ * guests. The scan is deferred, so it normally runs after
+ * sev_gmem_invalidate() has converted this guest's pages back to
+ * shared, and picks them up then. A very large guest whose
+ * conversion has not finished by then is picked up by a later
+ * teardown's scan.
+ */
+ snp_rmpopt_all_physmem();
} else {
sev_unbind_asid(kvm, sev->handle);
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread