From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
John Allen <john.allen@amd.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 02/11] attestation: Filter evidence objects per instance
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 11:54:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5aecd69ykw.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auSe3YzgKX-lu27G@FV6GYCPJ69>
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> writes:
> Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 04:26:09PM +0100, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org wrote:
>>Allow an attestation instance to expose only the evidence objects its
>>device supports. Add an optional evidence_object_supported() callback
>>and use it both when building DEVICE_GET capabilities and when checking
>>EVIDENCE_GET requests.
>>
>>The following PCI/TSM patch uses one attestation implementation for
>>devices that support different evidence objects. Its list includes
>>certificate slots 0-7, SPDM VCA, measurements, and a TDISP interface
>>report. Each device must expose only the objects it supports, for
>>example:
>>
>> Instance Supported evidence objects
>> ------------------------ ------------------------------------------
>> Host link using slot zero Certificate slot 0
>> CCA guest device Certificate slot 0, VCA, measurements,
>> TDISP interface report
>> Host PF0 after discovery Certificate slots reported populated by SPDM
>>
>>PCI/TSM checks the TSM driver's evidence_types bitmap or, after SPDM
>>discovery on a host PF0, the populated-slot bitmap. The preceding patch
>>controls whether EVIDENCE_GET is enabled; this patch controls which
>>objects that operation can retrieve.
>
> For SPDM slots, I think it would make sense to distinguish supported
> slot addresses from discovered population. DEVICE_GET describes fixed
> object tuples, formats and limits; SPDM_GET reports the populated
> slots and their certificate digests. An empty supported slot
> returns -ENOENT.
>
> Fixed differences between backend instances can be selected before
> publication. Please do not make the capability set follow a
> populated-slot bitmap that can change during the instance lifetime.
>
> [..]
We still need to filter objects such as measurements and the interface
report based on the backend instance. Are you suggesting that we do this
in attestation_evidence_object_find()?
supported = attestation_evidence_object_find(att, blob_class, has_instance,
instance, format);
if (!supported || !attestation_representation_in(supported, representation)) {
kfree(objects);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
So the backend will have some way to indicate which objects it supports,
such as the TSM driver's evidence_types bitmap, with the host setting it
to indicate support for only CERT_CHAIN[0-7]?
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 15:26 [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] PCI/TSM: Add CTLV attestation Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/11] attestation: Restrict inherited operations per instance Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-30 13:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/11] attestation: Filter evidence objects " Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-30 13:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-31 6:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/11] attestation: Enter secure operation when evidence is accepted Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-30 13:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-30 15:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-31 4:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/11] attestation: Bind object selection to accepted evidence snapshots Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/11] attestation: Make the evidence-get challenge attribute optional Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/11] PCI/TSM: Describe the PCI attestation control family Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-30 14:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-30 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-31 4:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-31 4:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/11] attestation: Add attestation helpers for PCI/TSM integration Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/11] PCI/TSM: Bind CTLV attestation to connected and locked contexts Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-28 22:56 ` Dave Jiang
2026-10-29 5:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-29 12:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-30 14:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-30 14:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-30 15:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/11] crypto/ccp: Defer SEV-TIO link setup until evidence acceptance Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/11] virt: coco: arm-cca-host: Publish slot zero and establish streams after acceptance Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-29 16:56 ` Dave Jiang
2026-10-29 17:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-30 9:58 ` Reshetova, Elena
2026-10-30 13:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-31 3:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-28 15:26 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/11] virt: coco: arm-cca-guest: Refresh selected evidence against trusted digests Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-10-30 12:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/11] PCI/TSM: Add CTLV attestation Xu Yilun
2026-10-30 15:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq5aecd69ykw.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=john.allen@amd.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox