From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ?
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:04:31 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070417130431.GA8685@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38b2ab8a0704170536x15920b15xedfd518cad50cee@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 02:36:09PM +0200, Francis Moreau (francis.moro@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> BTW, here are figures I got with 2 different versions of the driver
> >> when using tcrypt module. The second being the result with the
> >> optimized driver (no key reloading on each block):
> >>
> >> normal version:
> >> test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 67991 cycles (8192
> >> bytes)
> >>
> >> optimized version:
> >> test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 51783 cycles (8192
> >> bytes)
> >>
> >> So the gain is 16000 cycles which seems to worth the change, isn't it ?
> >
> >Sounds like it would. It would help of course if you posted the patch :)
> >
>
> OK, I tried to cook up something very simple. Since I don't know this
> code, please be indulgent when reading the following patch ;)
Which means that after one has loaded ecryptfs module it can not use
ipsec and dm-crypt if there is only one crypto algo registered...
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-17 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <38b2ab8a0704130630v4c840bd1w19f2a239f86a93b@mail.gmail.com>
2007-04-14 4:30 ` [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ? Herbert Xu
2007-04-14 13:15 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-14 19:34 ` Herbert Xu
2007-04-14 19:44 ` Michael Halcrow
2007-04-15 11:06 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-04-15 14:31 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-04-15 15:31 ` Michael Halcrow
2007-04-15 16:10 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-04-14 21:10 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-15 7:52 ` Herbert Xu
2007-04-16 8:37 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 0:41 ` Herbert Xu
2007-04-17 12:36 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 13:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2007-04-17 13:42 ` Herbert Xu
2007-04-17 14:01 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 15:08 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-04-17 15:34 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 15:57 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-04-17 16:18 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 17:07 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-04-17 13:57 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 13:40 ` Herbert Xu
2007-04-17 13:59 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 14:02 ` Herbert Xu
2007-04-17 14:41 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 15:40 ` Roland Dreier
2007-04-17 16:14 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 16:33 ` Roland Dreier
2007-04-17 17:24 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-17 17:34 ` Roland Dreier
2007-04-19 8:07 ` Francis Moreau
2007-04-23 13:56 ` Francis Moreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070417130431.GA8685@2ka.mipt.ru \
--to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox