From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mr.scada@gmail.com,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] talitos: Freescale integrated security engine (SEC) driver
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:59:02 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080531095901.GA16281@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080530171930.61965d59.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Hi.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 05:19:30PM -0500, Kim Phillips (kim.phillips@freescale.com) wrote:
> ok, I see what you are saying now; if a channel gets done during
> talitos_done processing, it'll trigger an interrupt and reset
> priv->status, leaving the tasklet in the dark as to which channel has
> done status, depending on how many channel dones it has already
> processed. I think the only solution here is to call flush_channel on
> each channel, regardless of the bits in the interrupt status - I'll
> send out a patch shortly.
Out of curiosity, what is number of channels? I had simialar issue with
HIFN crypto driver and limited number of descriptor to 80 iirc, since
with that number HIFN traversal did not show perfromance degradataion on
Ghz x86.
> > callback, during that time cached status and priv itself (and tail like
> > in two simultaneous flushes) could change (or not?)
>
> I think you're talking about a different 'status' here; flush_channel's
> local 'status' doesn't resemble priv->status bits in any way, it looks
> at the descriptor header writeback bits for done status, on a per
> descriptor basis. It forwards this descriptor done vs. error status to
> the callback.
>
> priv itself won't change; it's uniquely associated to the device.
I meant descriptor hdr value accessed via it - can it be checked in
tasklet under the lock and in submit path without? Can they correlate
somehow?
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-31 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-29 19:12 [PATCH 2/2] talitos: Freescale integrated security engine (SEC) driver Kim Phillips
2008-05-30 18:09 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-30 19:36 ` Kim Phillips
2008-05-30 19:41 ` Scott Wood
2008-05-30 20:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-30 20:16 ` Kim Phillips
2008-05-30 20:19 ` Scott Wood
2008-05-30 20:35 ` Kim Phillips
2008-05-30 20:36 ` Scott Wood
2008-05-30 20:48 ` Kim Phillips
2008-05-30 21:12 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-05-30 22:19 ` Kim Phillips
2008-05-31 9:59 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2008-06-02 14:27 ` Kim Phillips
2008-06-02 16:00 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-06-02 16:50 ` Kim Phillips
2008-06-02 17:57 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-06-02 19:06 ` Kim Phillips
2008-06-03 1:24 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080531095901.GA16281@2ka.mipt.ru \
--to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kim.phillips@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mr.scada@gmail.com \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox