From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Ofer Heifetz <oferh@marvell.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com,
gregory.clement@free-electrons.com,
miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com, igall@marvell.com,
nadavh@marvell.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] crypto: inside-secure - per request invalidation
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:42:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171128154236.19192-2-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171128154236.19192-1-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
From: Ofer Heifetz <oferh@marvell.com>
When an invalidation request is needed we currently override the context
.send and .handle_result helpers. This is wrong as under high load other
requests can already be queued and overriding the context helpers will
make them execute the wrong .send and .handle_result functions.
This commit fixes this by adding a needs_inv flag in the request to
choose the action to perform when sending requests or handling their
results. This flag will be set when needed (i.e. when the context flag
will be set).
Fixes: 1b44c5a60c13 ("crypto: inside-secure - add SafeXcel EIP197 crypto engine driver")
Signed-off-by: Ofer Heifetz <oferh@marvell.com>
[Antoine: commit message, and removed non related changes from the
original commit]
Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
---
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
index 5438552bc6d7..9ea24868d860 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <crypto/aes.h>
#include <crypto/skcipher.h>
+#include <crypto/internal/skcipher.h>
#include "safexcel.h"
@@ -33,6 +34,10 @@ struct safexcel_cipher_ctx {
unsigned int key_len;
};
+struct safexcel_cipher_req {
+ bool needs_inv;
+};
+
static void safexcel_cipher_token(struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx,
struct crypto_async_request *async,
struct safexcel_command_desc *cdesc,
@@ -126,9 +131,9 @@ static int safexcel_context_control(struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx,
return 0;
}
-static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
- struct crypto_async_request *async,
- bool *should_complete, int *ret)
+static int safexcel_handle_req_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
+ struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ bool *should_complete, int *ret)
{
struct skcipher_request *req = skcipher_request_cast(async);
struct safexcel_result_desc *rdesc;
@@ -265,7 +270,6 @@ static int safexcel_aes_send(struct crypto_async_request *async,
spin_unlock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].egress_lock);
request->req = &req->base;
- ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_result;
*commands = n_cdesc;
*results = n_rdesc;
@@ -341,8 +345,6 @@ static int safexcel_handle_inv_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
ring = safexcel_select_ring(priv);
ctx->base.ring = ring;
- ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_aes_send;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
enq_ret = crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, async);
@@ -359,6 +361,26 @@ static int safexcel_handle_inv_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
return ndesc;
}
+static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
+ struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ bool *should_complete, int *ret)
+{
+ struct skcipher_request *req = skcipher_request_cast(async);
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
+ int err;
+
+ if (sreq->needs_inv) {
+ sreq->needs_inv = false;
+ err = safexcel_handle_inv_result(priv, ring, async,
+ should_complete, ret);
+ } else {
+ err = safexcel_handle_req_result(priv, ring, async,
+ should_complete, ret);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+}
+
static int safexcel_cipher_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
int ring, struct safexcel_request *request,
int *commands, int *results)
@@ -368,8 +390,6 @@ static int safexcel_cipher_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
int ret;
- ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_inv_result;
-
ret = safexcel_invalidate_cache(async, &ctx->base, priv,
ctx->base.ctxr_dma, ring, request);
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -381,11 +401,29 @@ static int safexcel_cipher_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
return 0;
}
+static int safexcel_send(struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ int ring, struct safexcel_request *request,
+ int *commands, int *results)
+{
+ struct skcipher_request *req = skcipher_request_cast(async);
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (sreq->needs_inv)
+ ret = safexcel_cipher_send_inv(async, ring, request,
+ commands, results);
+ else
+ ret = safexcel_aes_send(async, ring, request,
+ commands, results);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int safexcel_cipher_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
{
struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
struct skcipher_request req;
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(&req);
struct safexcel_inv_result result = {};
int ring = ctx->base.ring;
@@ -399,7 +437,7 @@ static int safexcel_cipher_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
skcipher_request_set_tfm(&req, __crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm));
ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req.base.tfm);
ctx->base.exit_inv = true;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_cipher_send_inv;
+ sreq->needs_inv = true;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req.base);
@@ -424,19 +462,21 @@ static int safexcel_aes(struct skcipher_request *req,
enum safexcel_cipher_direction dir, u32 mode)
{
struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req->base.tfm);
+ struct safexcel_cipher_req *sreq = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
int ret, ring;
+ sreq->needs_inv = false;
ctx->direction = dir;
ctx->mode = mode;
if (ctx->base.ctxr) {
- if (ctx->base.needs_inv)
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_cipher_send_inv;
+ if (ctx->base.needs_inv) {
+ sreq->needs_inv = true;
+ ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
+ }
} else {
ctx->base.ring = safexcel_select_ring(priv);
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_aes_send;
-
ctx->base.ctxr = dma_pool_zalloc(priv->context_pool,
EIP197_GFP_FLAGS(req->base),
&ctx->base.ctxr_dma);
@@ -476,6 +516,11 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_cra_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
alg.skcipher.base);
ctx->priv = tmpl->priv;
+ ctx->base.send = safexcel_send;
+ ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_result;
+
+ crypto_skcipher_set_reqsize(__crypto_skcipher_cast(tfm),
+ sizeof(struct safexcel_cipher_req));
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
index 74feb6227101..6135c9f5742c 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct safexcel_ahash_req {
bool last_req;
bool finish;
bool hmac;
+ bool needs_inv;
u8 state_sz; /* expected sate size, only set once */
u32 state[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE / sizeof(u32)];
@@ -119,9 +120,9 @@ static void safexcel_context_control(struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx,
}
}
-static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
- struct crypto_async_request *async,
- bool *should_complete, int *ret)
+static int safexcel_handle_req_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
+ struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ bool *should_complete, int *ret)
{
struct safexcel_result_desc *rdesc;
struct ahash_request *areq = ahash_request_cast(async);
@@ -165,9 +166,9 @@ static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
return 1;
}
-static int safexcel_ahash_send(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
- struct safexcel_request *request, int *commands,
- int *results)
+static int safexcel_ahash_send_req(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
+ struct safexcel_request *request, int *commands,
+ int *results)
{
struct ahash_request *areq = ahash_request_cast(async);
struct crypto_ahash *ahash = crypto_ahash_reqtfm(areq);
@@ -292,7 +293,6 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_send(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
req->processed += len;
request->req = &areq->base;
- ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_result;
*commands = n_cdesc;
*results = 1;
@@ -374,8 +374,6 @@ static int safexcel_handle_inv_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
ring = safexcel_select_ring(priv);
ctx->base.ring = ring;
- ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
enq_ret = crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, async);
@@ -392,6 +390,26 @@ static int safexcel_handle_inv_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
return 1;
}
+static int safexcel_handle_result(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
+ struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ bool *should_complete, int *ret)
+{
+ struct ahash_request *areq = ahash_request_cast(async);
+ struct safexcel_ahash_req *req = ahash_request_ctx(areq);
+ int err;
+
+ if (req->needs_inv) {
+ req->needs_inv = false;
+ err = safexcel_handle_inv_result(priv, ring, async,
+ should_complete, ret);
+ } else {
+ err = safexcel_handle_req_result(priv, ring, async,
+ should_complete, ret);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+}
+
static int safexcel_ahash_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
int ring, struct safexcel_request *request,
int *commands, int *results)
@@ -400,7 +418,6 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx = crypto_ahash_ctx(crypto_ahash_reqtfm(areq));
int ret;
- ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_inv_result;
ret = safexcel_invalidate_cache(async, &ctx->base, ctx->priv,
ctx->base.ctxr_dma, ring, request);
if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -412,11 +429,30 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_send_inv(struct crypto_async_request *async,
return 0;
}
+static int safexcel_ahash_send(struct crypto_async_request *async,
+ int ring, struct safexcel_request *request,
+ int *commands, int *results)
+{
+
+ struct ahash_request *areq = ahash_request_cast(async);
+ struct safexcel_ahash_req *req = ahash_request_ctx(areq);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (req->needs_inv)
+ ret = safexcel_ahash_send_inv(async, ring, request,
+ commands, results);
+ else
+ ret = safexcel_ahash_send_req(async, ring, request,
+ commands, results);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int safexcel_ahash_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
{
struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
struct ahash_request req;
+ struct safexcel_ahash_req *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(&req);
struct safexcel_inv_result result = {};
int ring = ctx->base.ring;
@@ -430,7 +466,7 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_exit_inv(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
ahash_request_set_tfm(&req, __crypto_ahash_cast(tfm));
ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(req.base.tfm);
ctx->base.exit_inv = true;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send_inv;
+ rctx->needs_inv = true;
spin_lock_bh(&priv->ring[ring].queue_lock);
crypto_enqueue_request(&priv->ring[ring].queue, &req.base);
@@ -481,14 +517,16 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_enqueue(struct ahash_request *areq)
struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
int ret, ring;
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send;
+ req->needs_inv = false;
if (req->processed && ctx->digest == CONTEXT_CONTROL_DIGEST_PRECOMPUTED)
ctx->base.needs_inv = safexcel_ahash_needs_inv_get(areq);
if (ctx->base.ctxr) {
- if (ctx->base.needs_inv)
- ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send_inv;
+ if (ctx->base.needs_inv) {
+ ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
+ req->needs_inv = true;
+ }
} else {
ctx->base.ring = safexcel_select_ring(priv);
ctx->base.ctxr = dma_pool_zalloc(priv->context_pool,
@@ -622,6 +660,8 @@ static int safexcel_ahash_cra_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
struct safexcel_alg_template, alg.ahash);
ctx->priv = tmpl->priv;
+ ctx->base.send = safexcel_ahash_send;
+ ctx->base.handle_result = safexcel_handle_result;
crypto_ahash_set_reqsize(__crypto_ahash_cast(tfm),
sizeof(struct safexcel_ahash_req));
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 15:42 [PATCH v2 0/4] crypto: inside-secure - set of fixes Antoine Tenart
2017-11-28 15:42 ` Antoine Tenart [this message]
2017-11-28 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] crypto: inside-secure - free requests even if their handling failed Antoine Tenart
2017-11-28 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] crypto: inside-secure - only update the result buffer when provided Antoine Tenart
2017-11-30 9:19 ` Kamil Konieczny
2017-11-30 9:29 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-11-30 11:52 ` Kamil Konieczny
2017-11-30 12:41 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-11-30 14:10 ` Kamil Konieczny
2017-11-30 14:30 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-12-01 0:31 ` Herbert Xu
2017-12-01 8:11 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-12-01 10:18 ` Kamil Konieczny
2017-12-01 10:24 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-12-01 10:43 ` Kamil Konieczny
2017-12-01 10:55 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-12-01 10:36 ` Herbert Xu
2017-12-01 11:24 ` Kamil Konieczny
2017-12-01 10:35 ` Herbert Xu
2017-12-01 10:52 ` Antoine Tenart
2017-11-28 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] crypto: inside-secure - fix request allocations in invalidation path Antoine Tenart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171128154236.19192-2-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--to=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=igall@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=oferh@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox